Participatory bioethics research and its social impact: The case of coercion reduction in psychiatry

Bioethics

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 144-152

  Abma, Tineke A ^a   Voskes, Yolande ^a   Widdershoven, Guy ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bioethics research; Coercion; Participatory; Psychiatry; Social impact

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MODEL; MOTIVATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHIATRY; SOCIAL CHANGE; VOICE; ETHICS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MORALITY;

BIOETHICS; COERCION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MORALS; PSYCHIATRY; SOCIAL CHANGE;

EID: 85009064130     PISSN: 02699702     EISSN: 14678519     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12319     Document Type: Note

References (62)

1. T.A. Abma, T.A. & G.A.M. Widdershoven Dialogical Ethics and Responsive Evaluation as a Framework for Patient Participation. AJOB 2014; 14(6): 27–29;
2. T.A. Abma et al. Inter-ethics, towards an interactive and interdependent bioethics. Bioethics 2010; 24(5):242–55;
3. T.A. Abma, B. Molewijk & G.A.M. Widdershoven. Good care in ongoing dialogues. Responsive evaluation and moral deliberation, Health Care Analysis 2009; 17(3):217–35;
4. G.A.M. Widdershoven, T.A. Abma & B. Molewijk Improving care and ethics: a plea for interactive empirical ethics, Am J Bioeth 2009; (9) 6 & 7: 99–101;
5. G.A.M. Widdershoven, T.A. Abma & B. Molewijk. Empirical ethics as dialogical practice, Bioethics 2009; 23(4): 236–248.
6. C. Donovan et al. Evaluation of the impact of National Breast Cancer Foundation-funded research. Med J Aust 2014; 200(4):214–218; Wright et al. eds. 2013. Position Paper No. 1 What is Participatory Health Research? Berlin: International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research; Banks et al., eds. 2013. Position Paper No. 2 Participatory Health Research A Guide to Ethical Principles and Practice. Berlin: International Collaboration for Participatory HealthResearch.
7. J.C. Greene. Stakeholder participation and utilization program evaluation. Eval Rev 1988; 12(2): 91–116;
8. J.C. Greene. 2006. Evaluation, democracy and social change. In The Sage Handbook of Evaluation. I.F. Shaw, J.C. Greene, & M.M. Mark, eds. London & Thousand Oaks: Sage: 118–140;
9. J.C. Greene. 1997. Participatory evaluation. In Evaluation and the postmodern dilemma, Advances in program evaluation L. Mabry, ed., Vol. 3, Greenwhich, CT: JAI Press: 171–190;
10. L.M. Shulha & J.B. Cousins. Evaluation Use: Theory, Research, and Practice Since 1986. Eval Pract 1997; 18(3): 195–208
11. T.A. Abma. The practice and politics of responsive evaluation, Am J Eval, 2005; 27(1): 31–43;
12. T.A. Abma & R.E. Stake. 2001. Stake’s responsive evaluation. In Responsive evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, J. Greene & T.A. Abma, eds. 92: 7–23;
13. E.G. Guba & Y.S. Lincoln. 1989 Fourth Generation Evaluation. Beverly Hills:Sage; R.E. Stake. ed. 2004. Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
14. R.E. Stake 1975. To evaluate an arts program. In R.E. Stake Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach Columbus OH: Merrill: 13–31.
15. H.G. Gadamer, ed. 1960. Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr; H.G. Gadamer, ed. 2004. Truth and Method. 2nd edn. London: Sheed and Ward Stagbooks;
16. G.A.M. Widdershoven & T.A. Abma. 2007. Hermeneutic ethics between practice and theory, in Principles of Health Care. R.E. Ashcroft, A. Dawson, H. Draper, & J.R. McMillan, eds. West Sussex: Wiley: 215–222;
17. G.A.M. Widdershoven & S. Metselaar. 2012. Gadamer_s truth andmethod andmoral case deliberation in clinical ethics. In S. Kasten (ed.), Hermeneutics and the humanities: Dialogues with Hans- Georg Gadamer. LeidenUniversity Press.
18. T.A. Schwandt, ed. 2002. Evaluation practice reconsidered. NY: Peter Lang.
19. Ibid.
20. T.A. Abma & G.A.M. Widdershoven. 2011. Evaluation as a Relationally Responsive Practice Practice. In Qualitative Research. N. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln, eds. Sage Handbook. Los Angelos: Sage Publications: 669–680;
21. M.A. Visse, T.A. Abma, & G.A.M. Widdershoven. 2012.Relational responsibilities in responsive evaluation. Evaluation & Program Planning. 35(1):97–104.
22. T.A. Abma. The practice and politics of responsive evaluation. Am J Eval 2005; 27(1): 31–43;
23. T.A. Abma, C. Nierse & G.A.M. Widdershoven. Patients as research partners in responsive research. Methodological notions for collaborations in research agenda setting. Qual Health Res 2009; 19(3): 401–415;
24. V.E. Baur et al. Dealing with distrust and power dynamics: asymmetric relations among stakeholders in responsive evaluation. Evaluation 2010; 16(3): 233–248.
25. T.A. Abma, & G.A.M. Widdershoven. Social relation as/in evaluation. Evaluation, 2008 April, 14(2): 209–225.
26. T. A. Abma and R.E. Stake (2001) Stake_s responsive evaluation. In Responsive evaluation. J. Greene and T.A. Abma, eds. New Directions for Evaluation 92:7–23.
27. J. Tronto 1993. Moral boundaries. A political argument for an ethic of care. New York/London: Routledge;
28. J. Tronto 2013. Caring Democracy. Markets, equality and justice. New York: New York university press;
29. M.A. Visse, T.A. Abma, & G.A.M. Widdershoven. Practising political care ethics: can responsive evaluation foster democratic care? Ethics & SocialWelfare 2014. doi:10.1080/17496535.2015.1005550.
30. Schwandt. op. cit. note 11.
31. Stake. op. cit. note 9.
32. T. Cook. The Importance of Mess in Action Research. Educational Action Research 1998; 6(1): 93–109
33. G. Widdershoven & R.J. Berghmans. Coercion and pressure in psychiatry: lessons from Ulysses.J. Med Ethics 2007; 33(10):560–63;
34. E.J. Prinsen & J.J. Can we justify eliminating coercive measures in psychiatry? J Med Ethics. 2009;35(1):69–73. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022780.
35. T. Hoekstra, H.H.G.M. Lendemeijer & M.G.M.J. Jansen. Seclusion: the inside story. J Psychiat rMent Health Nurs 2004; 11: 276–83.
36. E.G.M. Landeweer, T.A. Abma & G.A.M. Widdershoven. The essence of psychiatric nursing: redefining nurses_ identity through moral dialogue about reducing the use of coercion and restraint. Adv Nurs Sci 2010;33(4):E31–42.
37. R. Berghmans et al., eds. 2001. Kwaliteit van dwang en drang in de psychiatrie. Maastricht: Instituut voor gezondheidsethiek Universiteit van Maastricht.
38. EGM Landeweer, TA Abma T & GAM Widdershoven. The essence of psychiatric nursing: redefining nurses_ identity through moral dialogue about reducing the use of coercion and restraint. Adv Nurs Sci 2010; 33(4):E31–42;
39. EGM Landeweer, TA Abma, & GAM Widdershoven. Moral margins concerning the use of coercion in psychiatry, Nursing Ethics 2010;18(3): 304–316.
40. T. A. Abma. Evaluation and communities as practice. Psychiatry as a case example. Evaluation 2006; 13(1): 32–48.
41. W. Janssen et al. The use of seclusion in the Netherlands compared to countries in and outside Europe. Int J Law Psychiatry 2008; 31: 463–470.
42. E.O. Noorthoorn, Y. Voskes, W.A. Janssen, et al. SeclusionReduction in Dutch Mental Health Care: Did Hospitals Meet Goals? Psychiatric Services, 2016. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500414
43. Y. Voskes, E.O. Noordhoorn, J. Theunissen, et al. Reduction of seclusion inDutchmental healthcare: interventions and conditions. JAdv.Nurs 2015;
44. Y. Voskes, M. Kemper, E. Landeweer & G.A.M. Widdershoven. Preventing seclusion in psychiatry: A care ethics perspective on _the first five minutes at admission._ Nursing Ethics, 2015. doi: 10.1177/ 0969733013493217;
45. Y. Voskes, K. Evenblij, E. Noordhoor, et al. Moral case deliberation on coercive measures in psychiatry: dilemmas, value and implementation, Psychiatrische Praxis, 2014;14, 364–370.
46. L. van der Ham, Y. Voskes, N. van Kempen, G.A.M. Crisis card implementations issues: lessons from a Dutch crisis card initiative. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2013; 36(2):119–121.
47. B. Molewijk et al. Teaching ethics in the clinic: The theory and practice of moral case deliberation. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 120–124.
48. L.B. Gates & S.H. Akabas. Developing strategies to integrate peer providers into the staff of mental health agencies. Adm Policy Ment Health 2007; 24(3): 293–306.
49. Y. Voskes. 2015. No effect without ethics. Reduction of seclusion in psychiatry from a care ethics perspective, Diss. Ridderprint BV Ridderkerk.
50. Y. Voskes, note 32; J. Tronto 1993. Moral boundaries. A political argument for an ethic of care. New York/London: Routledge;
51. T.A. Abma & H. van der Zee (2005) Clientenparticipatie in dwangen drangprojecten: een eerste begin. In: Abma, T.A., G.A.M. Widdershoven en B. Lendemeijer (red.) (pp. 107–118) Dwang en drang in de psychiatrie, De kwaliteit van vrijheidsbeperkende maatregelen, Utrecht: Lemma.
52. T.A. Abma (2006) Evaluation and communities as practice. Psychiatry as a case example, Evaluation, 13(1): 32–48.
53. T.A. Abma (2005) The practice and politics of responsive evaluation, The American Journal of Evaluation, 27(1): 31–43;
54. T.A. Abma, V. Baur, B. Molewijk & G.A.M. Widdershoven (2010), Inter-ethics, Towards an interactive and interdependent bioethics. Bioethics 24(5):242–55.
55. T.A. Schwandt, op. cit. note 11.
56. GAM Widdershoven and T.A. Abma. 2007. Hermeneutic ethics between practice and theory, in R.E. Ashcroft, A. Dawson, H. Draper, & J.R. McMillan, eds. Principles of Health Care Ethics. West Sussex: Wiley: 215–222.
57. See note 1.
58. For example compare: H.I. Lipman, T. Powell, Process Matters: Notes on Bioethics Consultation, AMA Journal of Ethics, available at: http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2016/05/ecas2-1605.html).
59. P. Borry, P. Schotmans & K. Diericks. 2004 Empirical ethics: a challenge to bioethics Med Healthc Philos 2004; 7(1): 1–3;
60. Musschenga, A.W. Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism, J Med Philos 2005;30:5, 467–490;
61. Vries, De, R. B. Gordijn. Empirical ethics and its alleged meta-ethical challenges, Bioethics 2009; 23(4): 193–201;
62. J. McMillan & T. Hope. 2008. The possibility of empirical psychiatric ethics. In G. Widdershoven, J. McMillan, T. Hope, L. Van der Scheer, eds. Empirical ethics in psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 9–23.