Seclusion reduction in Dutch mental health care: Did hospitals meet goals?

Psychiatric Services

Volumn 67, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 1321-1327

  Noorthoorn, Eric O ^a,b   Voskes, Yolande ^c   Janssen, Wim A ^d   Mulder, Cornelis L ^e   De Sande, Roland Van ^e,f   Nijman, Henk L I ^g,h   Smit, Annet ⁱ   Hoogendoorn, Adriaan W ^c   Bousardt, Annelea ^a   Widdershoven, Guy A M ^c  

^a Forensische Psychiatrie de Boog   (Netherlands)

^b Head of Research GGnet Community Mental Health Centre   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d THE HAGUE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^e PARNASSIA PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^g Forensic Psychiatric Institute   (Netherlands)

^h RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

ⁱ Pro Persona   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADJUSTMENT DISORDER; AGE; ARTICLE; ASPERGER SYNDROME; BIPOLAR DISORDER; DEPRESSION; DRUG THERAPY; FEMALE; FORCED MEDICATION; GENDER; HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; ISOLATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICATION COMPLIANCE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT ISOLATION; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SECLUSION; TREATMENT DURATION; WARD; ADULT; CLINICAL TRIAL; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; MENTAL HOSPITAL; MOTIVATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS;

ADULT; COERCION; FEMALE; GOALS; HOSPITALS, PSYCHIATRIC; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT ADMISSION; PATIENT ISOLATION;

EID: 85000785511     PISSN: 10752730     EISSN: 15579700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500414     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Vrijlandt AJ: A comparison of coercive measures in Europe [in German]; in Violence and Coercion in Inpatient Psychiatry [in German]. Edited by Kebbel J, Pörksen N. Cologne, Germany, 1998
2. Janssen WA, Noorthoorn EO, de Vries WJ, et al: The use of seclusion in the Netherlands compared to countries in and outside Europe. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 31:463-470, 2008
3. Noorthoorn EO, Lepping P, Janssen WA, et al: One year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective. Social Psychiatry And Psychiatric Epidemiology (Epub ahead of print, July 19, 2015)
4. Berghmans R, Elfahmi D, Goldsteen M, et al: Quality of Coercion and Compulsion in Psychiatry [in Dutch]. Maastricht, the Netherlands, Universiteit van Maastricht, Instituut Voor Gezondheidsethiek, 2001
5. Abma T, Widdershoven GAM, Lendemeijer HHGM: Coercion and Compulsion in Psychiatry: Quality of Freedom Reduction Interventions [in Dutch]. Utrecht, Netherlands, Lemma, 2005
6. van de Sande R, Nijman HLI, Noorthoorn EO, et al: Aggression and seclusion on acute psychiatric wards: effect of short-Term risk assessment. British Journal of Psychiatry 199:473-478, 2011
7. Mann-Poll PS, Smit A, de Vries WJ, et al: Factors contributing to mental health professionals decision to use seclusion. Psychiatric Services 62:498-503, 2011
8. Noorthoorn EO, Janssen WA, Theunissen J, et al: The power of day-To-day motivational techniques and family participation in reducing seclusion: A comparison of two admission wards with and without a seclusion prevention protocol. International Journal of Mental Health 37:81-98, 2008
9. Voskes Y, Theunissen J, Widdershoven GAM: Best Practices in Coercion Reduction in Mental Health Care [in Dutch]. Amersfoort, the Netherlands, GGZ Nederland, 2011
10. van der Schaaf PS, Dusseldorp E, Keuning FM, et al: Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion. British Journal of Psychiatry 202:142-149, 2013
11. Vruwink FJ, Mulder CL, Noorthoorn EO, et al: The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands. BMC Psychiatry 12:231, 2012
12. Nederland GGZ: Argus: Uniform Registration of Freedom Reduction Interventions in Mental Health Care [in Dutch]. Amersfoort and Den Haag, the Netherlands Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sport and Dutch Health Care Inspectorate, 2010
13. Janssen WA, van de Sande R, Noorthoorn EO, et al: Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 34:429-438, 2011
14. Joined Forces: Ambitions of Mental Health Care [in Dutch]. Amersfoort, GGZ Nederland, 2004
15. Letter of the Minister of Health to the Parliament With Respect to Coercive Measures [in Duch]. Amsterdam, Government of the Netherlands, 2012. www.rijksoverheid.nl
16. El-Badri SM, Mellsop G: A study of the use of seclusion in an acute psychiatric service. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 36:399-403, 2002
17. Dulk CJ, van den Stadt H, Vliegen JM: A New Measure for Urbanity: The Neighborhood Address Density Index. Amsterdam, Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics
18. Skrondahl A, Rabe-Hesketh S: Some applications of generalized linear latent and mixed models in epidemiology: repeated measures, measurement error and multilevel modeling. Norsk Epidemiologi 13:265-278, 2003
19. Janssen WA, Noorthoorn EO, Nijman HLI, et al: Differences in seclusion rates between admission wards: does patient compilation explain? Psychiatric Quarterly 84:39-52, 2013
20. McFadden D: Conditional logit regression of qualitative choice behaviour; in Frontiers in Econometrics. Edited by Zarembka P. New York, Academic Press, 1974
21. Steinert T, Noorthoorn EO, Mulder CL: The use of coercive interventions in mental health care in Germany and the Netherlands: A comparison of the developments in two neighboring countries. Frontiers in Public Health 2:141, 2014
22. Verlinde AA, Snelleman W, Van den Berg H, et al: Effect of forced medication and intervention of choice for separation and applied coercion: A prospective cohort study [in Dutch]. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie 56:640-648, 2013
23. Georgieva I, Mulder CLI, Noorthoorn EO: Reducing seclusion through involuntary medication: A randomized clinical trial. Psychiatry Research 205:48-53, 2013
24. Whittington R, Bowers L, Nolan P, et al: Approval ratings of inpatient coercive interventions in a national sample of mental health service users and staff in England. Psychiatric Services 60: 792-798, 2009
25. Steinert T, Lepping P: Legal provisions and practice in the management of violent patients: A case vignette study in 16 European countries. European Psychiatry 24:135-141, 2009
26. Gezondheidszorg I: Reduction of Seclusion Stagnates, Standards Imperative: Findings of a Study of Prevention of Seclusion Between 2008 and 2011 [in Dutch]. Utrecht, the Netherlands, Dutch Health Care Inspectorate, 2011
27. Gezondheidszorg I: Mental Health Institutes Invest in Seclusion Reduction, More Activities Necessary to Meet Goals, 2011-2015. Utrecht, the Netherlands, Dutch Health Care Inspectorate, 2015
28. Mierlo T, Bovenberg F, Voskes Y, et al: High and Intensive Care in Psychiatry [in Dutch]. Utrecht, the Netherlands, De Tijdstroom, 2013
29. Bowers L, Jeffery D, Bilgin H, et al: Psychiatric intensive care units: A literature review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 54:56-68, 2008
30. Gaskin CJ, Elsom SJ, Happell B: Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities: review of the literature. British Journal of Psychiatry 191:298-303, 2007
31. Huckshorn KA: Reducing seclusion restraint in mental health use settings: core strategies for prevention. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services 42:22-33, 2004