Relational responsibilities in responsive evaluation

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 97-104

  Visse, Merel ^a   Abma, Tineke A ^a   Widdershoven, Guy A M ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ethics of evaluation practice; Reflection; Relational responsibility; Responsive evaluation; Values

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTABILITY; ETHICS; GUIDELINE; MORALITY; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER;

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MORALITY; NETHERLANDS; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; NETHERLANDS; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 80052861992     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abma T.A. Voices from the margins: Political and ethical dilemmas in evaluation. Canadian Review of Social Policy/Revue Canadienne de Politique Sociale 1997, 39:41-53.
2. Abma T.A. Stakeholder Conflict: A Case Study. Evaluation and Program Planning 2000, 23(2):199-210.
3. Abma T.A. Evaluating palliative care: Facilitating reflexive dialogues about an ambiguous concept. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2001, 4:261-276.
4. Abma T.A. Learning by telling. Storytelling workshops as an organizational learning intervention. Management Learning 2003, 34(2):221-240.
5. Abma T.A. A difficult relationship between oncology ward staff and a patient's husband: a case study. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 2004, 10(4):180-184.
6. Abma T.A. The practice and politics of responsive evaluation. The American Journal of Evaluation 2005, 27(1):31-43.
7. Abma T.A., Nierse C., Widdershoven G.A.M. Patients as research partners in responsive research. Methodological notions for collaborations in research agenda setting. Qualitative Health Research 2009, 19(3):401-415.
8. Abma, T. A., & Stake, R. (2001). Stake's responsive evaluation: Core ideas and evolution. New Directions for Evaluation, Special Issue: Responsive Evaluation, 92, 7-22.
9. Abma, T. A., & Visse, M. A. (1996). Eindrapport responsief onderzoek naar Consultteam palliatieve zorg.
10. Abma T.A., Widdershoven G.A.M. Evaluation as social relation. Evaluation 2008, 14(2):209-225.
11. Abma T.A., Widdershoven G.A.M. Evaluation as a relationally responsible practice. Handbook of Qualitative Research 2011, Forthcoming. N.K. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (Eds.).
12. Aristotle Eudemian Ethics, books I, II and VIII. Clarendon Aristotle Series 1992, Oxford University Press. J.L. Ackrill, L. Judson (Eds.).
13. Baur V.E., Elteren van A.H.J., Nierse C.J., Abma T.A. Dealing with distrust and power dynamics. Asymmetric relations between stakeholders in evaluation. Evaluation 2010, 16(3):233-248.
14. Bernstein R.J. Beyond objectivism and relativism. Science, hermeneutics and praxis 1983, University of Pennsylvania Press.
15. Freeman M., Preissle J., Havick S. Moral knowledge and responsibilities in evaluation implementation: When critical theory and responsive evaluation collide. Critical social theory and evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation 2010, 127:45-57.
16. Gadamer H.G. Truth and method 1975, Seabury Press, New York.
17. Gilligan C. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development 1982, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Giordano J., O' Reilly M., Taylor H., Dogra N. Confidentiality and autonomy: The challenge(s) of offering research participants a choice of disclosing their identity. Qualitative Health Research 2007, 2(17):264-275.
19. Greene J.G. Stakeholder participation and utilization in program evaluation. Evaluation Review 1988, 2(12):91-116.
20. Greene J.C. Evaluation as advocacy. American Journal of Evaluation 1997, 18:25-35.
21. Greene J.C. Evaluation as education. Presentation at the Annual Congress of the European Evaluation Society 2002.
22. Greene J.C. Serving the public good. Evaluation and Program Planning 2010, 33(2):197-200.
23. Guba E., Lincoln G. Fourth generation evaluation 1989, Beverly Hills, Sage.
24. House E.R., Howe K.R. Values in evaluation and social research 1999, Sage Publications.
25. Karnieli-Miller O., Strier O., Pessach L. Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 2009, 2(19):279-289.
26. Koch T. 'Having a say': Negotiation in fourth generation evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000, 31(1):117-125.
27. Mertens D.M. Transformative Research and Evaluation 2009, Guilford, New York and London.
28. Niessen T., Abma T.A., Widdershoven G.A.M., van der Vleuten C. Learning-in-(inter)action: A dialogical turn to evaluation and learning. Handbook for educational evaluation 2008, Newbury Park, Sage. K. Ryan (Ed.).
29. Nussbaum M.C. The therapy of desire: Theory and practice in Hellenistic ethics 1994, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
30. Schwandt T.A. Recapturing moral discourse in evaluation. Educational Researcher 1989, 18:11-17.
31. Schwandt T.A. Thoughts on the moral career of the interpretive inquirer. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 1995, 19:131-140.
32. Schwandt T.A. A postscript on thinking about dialogue. Evaluation 2001, (7):264-276.
33. Schwandt T.A. Expanding the conversation on evaluation ethics. Evaluation and Program Planning 2007, 30:400-403.
34. Stake R.E. Evaluating the arts in education: A responsiveness approach 1975, Ohio, Columbus.
35. Stake R.E. Standards-based and responsive evaluation 2004, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
36. Wadsworth Y. Becoming responsive - and some consequences for evaluation as dialogue across distance, new directions for evaluation 2001, Vol. 92. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, (pp. 45-58).
37. Walker M.U. Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics 1998, Routledge, New York.
38. Walker M.U. Moral understandings. A feminist study in ethics 2007, London, Routledge.