Collaborative team ethnography and the paradoxes of interpretation

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 137-154

  Gerstl Pepin, Cynthia I ^a   Gunzenhauser, Michael G ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008830340     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09518390110111884     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, 5, 7-27.
2. Adkins, A., & Gunzenhauser, M. G. (in press). West Hollow School and the North Carolina A+ Schools Program: Integrating the arts, crafting a local agenda for reform. In W. Pink & G.W. Noblit (Eds.), Cultural matters: Lessons learned from ®eld studies of several leading school reform strategies.
3. Bahktin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
4. Behar, R. & Gordon, D. A. (Eds.) (1995). Women writing culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
5. Britzman, D. P. (1995). The question of belief: Writing poststructural ethnography. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(3), 229-238.
6. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.) (1986). Writing culture: the poetics andpolitics of ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
8. Cooper, J. E., Brandon, P. R., & Lindberg, M. A. (1998). Evaluators’ use of peer debriefing: Three impressionist tales. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(2), 265-280.
9. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
10. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds) (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Ellsworth, E. (1997). Teaching positions: Difference, pedagogy, and the power of address. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Erickson, K. C., & Stull, D. D. (1998). Doing team ethnography: Warnings and advice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Felman, S. (1983). The literary speech act: Don Juan with J. L. Austin, or seduction in two languages (C. Porter, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14. Felman, S. (1987). Jacques Lacan and the adventure of insight: Psychoanalysis in contemporary culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Fine, M. (1994). Dis-stance and other stances: Negotiations of power inside feminist research. In A. Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research (pp. 13-35). New York: Routledge.
16. Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
18. Gerstl-Pepin, C. I. (1998). Cultivating democratic educational reform: A critical examination of the A+ Schools Program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
19. Gitlin, A. (Ed.) (1994). Power and method: Political activism and educational research. New York: Routledge.
20. Gunzenhauser, M. G., & Noblit, G. (2001, in press). The arts and school reform: Creativity in A+ classrooms and schools. Winston-Salem, NC: Thomas S. Kenan Institute for the Arts.
21. Hafernik, J. J., Messerschmitt, D. S., & Vandrick, S. (1997). Collaborative research: Why and how? Educational Researcher, 26(9), 31-35.
22. King, J. R. (1999). Am not! Are too! Using queer standpoint in postmodern critical ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(5), 473-490.
23. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
24. Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673-694.
25. Lather, P., & Smithies, C. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26. LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
27. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Mertens, D. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Noblit, G. (1999). The possibilities of postcritical ethnographies: An introduction to this issue. Educational Foundations, 13(1), 3-6.
31. Patai, D. (1991). U.S. academics and Third World women: Is ethical research possible? In S. B. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women's words: The feminist practice of oral history. New York: Routledge.
32. Patterson, J., & Neufeld, P. (1998). The nucleus has a beard: Fostering collaborative research teams. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
33. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
35. Quantz, R. (1992). On critical ethnography (with some postmodern considerations). In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, and J. Goetz (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 447-505). San Diego: Academic Press.
36. Scheurich, J. J. (1996). The masks of validity: A deconstructive investigation. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(1), 49-60.
37. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
38. St. Pierre, E. A. (1997). Methodology in the fold and the irruption of transgressive data. Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(2), 175-189.
39. St. Pierre, E. A. & Pillow, W. S. (Eds.) (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York: Routledge.
40. Stacey, J. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women’s Studies International Forum, 11(1), 21-27.
41. Villenas, S. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization, and cooptation in the field. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 711-731.
42. Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
43. Wasser, J., & Bressler, L. (1996). Working the interpretative zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5-15.
44. Whitt, E. J., & Kuh, G. D. (1991). Qualitative methods in a team approach to multiple-institution studies. Review of Higher Education, 14(3), 317-338.