Evaluators' use of peer debriefing: Three impressionist tales

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 265-279

  Cooper, Joanne E ^a   Brandon, Paul R ^a   Lindberg, Marlene A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040880575     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107780049800400207     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aiken, S.H., Anderson, K., Dinnerstein, M., Lensink, J., & MacCorquodale, P. (1990). Trying transformations: Curriculum integration and the problem of resistance In C. F. Conrad & J. G. Haworth (Eds.), Curriculum in transition: Perspectives on the undergraduate experience (pp. 351-366). Needham Heights, MA: Ginn.
2. Bacharach, S.B., & Lawler, E.J. (1980). Power and politics in organizations San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Bradshaw-Camball, P. (1989). The implications of multiple perspectives on power for organization development Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 25, 31-44.
4. Brandon, P.R. (1994, November). Involving program beneficiaries in reviews of evaluators' recommendations for curriculum revisions Paper presented at the meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Boston, MA.
5. Cassell, J. (1980). Ethical principles in conducting fieldwork, American Anthropologist, 82, 28-41.
6. Chavis, D.M., Stucky, P.E., & Wandersman, A. (1983). Returning basic research to the community: A relationship between scientist and citizen American Psychologist, 38, 424-434.
7. Conrad, C.F. (1990). A grounded theory of academic change In C. F. Conrad & J. G. Haworth (Eds.), Curriculum in transition: Perspectives on the undergraduate experience (pp. 337-350). Needham Heights, MA: Ginn.
8. Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (Eds.). (1995). Participatory evaluation in education: Studies in evaluation use and organizational learning. Washington, DC: Falmer.
9. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Fullan, M.G., & Miles, M.B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't Phi Beta Kappan, 73, 745-752.
11. Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Israel, B.A., Schurman, S.J., & Hugentobler, M.K. (1992). Conducting action research: Relationships between organization members and researchers Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28, 74-101.
13. Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation New York: Basic Books.
14. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Mirvis, P.H., & Seashore, S.E. (1979). Being ethical in organizational research American Psychologist, 34, 766-780.
16. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. O'Neill, R. (1995). Implementation frailties of Guba and Lincoln's fourth generation evaluation theory Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, 5-21.
18. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Pittman, M.A., & Maxwell, J.A. (1992). Qualitative approaches to evaluation: Models and methods In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Spall, S. (1997). Peer debriefing in qualitative research: Emerging operational models Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
21. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Yin, R.K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.