Robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis

Surgery (United States)

Volumn 161, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 628-636

  Huang, Yeqian ^a   Chua, Terence C ^a   Maddern, Guy J ^b   Samra, Jaswinder S ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; EMBASE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HOSPITALIZATION; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; OPERATIVE TIME; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85008219788     PISSN: 00396060     EISSN: 15327361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.061     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. 1 Tsui, C., Klein, R., Garabrant, M., Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc 27 (2013), 2253–2257.
2. 2 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Group (AR- DRG), Australia, 1998-99 to 2007-2008. Position Statement; 2009. Available online - https://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/22399F9147ACEF5DCA257BF0001D3A52/$File/Final_Report_November_2009.pdf.
3. 3 Reynolds, W.J., The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 5 (2001), 89–94.
4. 4 Johansson, M., Thune, A., Nelvin, L., Stiernstam, M., Westman, B., Lundell, L., Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92 (2005), 44–49.
5. 5 Navarra, G., Pozza, E., Occhionorelli, S., Carcoforo, P., Donini, I., One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg, 84, 1997, 695.
6. 6 Qiu, J., Yuan, H., Chen, S., He, Z., Han, P., Wu, H., Single-port versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 23 (2013), 815–831.
7. 7 Joseph, M., Phillips, M.R., Farrell, T.M., Rupp, C., Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of caution. Ann Surg 256 (2012), 1–6.
8. 8 Escobar, P.F., Haber, G.P., Kaouk, J., Kroh, M., Chalikonda, S., Falcone, T., Single-port surgery: laboratory experience with the daVinci single-site platform. JSLS 15 (2011), 136–141.
9. 9 Hozo, S.P., Djulbegovic, B., Hozo, I., Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol, 5, 2005, 13.
10. 10 DerSimonian, R., Laird, N., Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7 (1986), 177–188.
11. 11 Aiono, S., Gilbert, J., Soin, B., Finlay, P., Gordan, A., Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (Endo Assist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16 (2002), 1267–1270.
12. 12 Ruurda, J.P., Visser, P.L., Broeders, I.A., Analysis of procedure time in robot-assisted surgery: comparative study in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Comput Aided Surg 8 (2003), 24–29.
13. 13 Kraft, B., Jäger, C., Kraft, K., Leibl, B., Bittner, R., The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: Increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient?. Surg Endosc 18 (2004), 1216–1223.
14. 14 Kornprat, P., Werkgartner, G., Cerwenka, H., Bacher, H., El-Shabrawi, A., Rehak, P., et al. Prospective study comparing standard and robotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391 (2006), 216–221.
15. 15 Breitenstein, S., Nocito, A., Puhan, M., Held, U., Weber, M., Clavien, P.A., Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 247 (2008), 987–993.
16. 16 Jayaraman, S., Davies, W., Schlachta, C.M., Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. Can J Surg 52 (2009), 374–378.
17. 17 Spinoglio, G., Lenti, L.M., Maglione, V., Lucido, F.S., Priora, F., Bianchi, P.P., et al. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 26 (2012), 1648–1655.
18. 18 Buzad, F.A., Corne, L.M., Brown, T.C., Fagin, R.S., Hebert, A.E., Kaczmarek, C.A., et al. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: efficiency and cost analysis. Int J Med Robot 9 (2013), 365–370.
19. 19 Gonzalez, A.M., Rabaza, J.R., Donkor, C., Romero, R.J., Kosanovic, R., Verdeja, J.C., Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27 (2013), 4524–4531.
20. 20 Ayloo, S., Roh, Y., Choudhury, N., Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 12 (2014), 1077–1081.
21. 21 Gillen, S., Pletzer, B., Heiligensetzer, A., Wolf, P., Kleeff, J., Feussner, H., et al. Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 28 (2014), 164–170.
22. 22 Kaminski, J.P., Bueltmann, K.W., Rudnicki, M., Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy inpatient analysis: does the end justify the means?. J Gastrointest Surg 18 (2014), 2116–2122.
23. 23 Chung, P.J., Huang, R., Policastro, L., Lee, R., Schwartzman, A., Alfonso, A., et al. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy at an inner-city academic center. JSLS, 19, 2015.
24. 24 Honaker, M.D., Paton, B.L., Stefanidis, D., Schiffern, L.M., Can robotic surgery be done efficiently while training residents?. J Surg Educ 72 (2015), 377–380.
25. 25 Pietrabissa, A., Pugliese, L., Vinci, A., Peri, A., Tinozzi, F.P., Cavazzi, E., et al. Short-term outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Surg Endosc 30 (2016), 3089–3097.
26. 26 Giulianotti, P.C., Coratti, A., Angelini, M., Sbrana, F., Cecconi, S., Balestracci, T., et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138 (2003), 777–784.
27. 27 Heemskerk, J., Bouvy, N.D., Baeten, C.G., The end of robot-assisted laparoscopy? A critical appraisal of scientific evidence on the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 28 (2014), 1388–1398.
28. 28 Litynski, G.S., Erich Muhe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS 2 (1985), 341–346.
29. 29 Pugin, F., Bucher, P., Morel, P., History of robotic surgery: from AESOP(R) and ZEUS(R) to da Vinci(R). J Visc Surg 148:5 Suppl (2011), e3–e8.
30. 30 Gustafson, M., Lescouflair, T., Kimball, R., Daoud, I., A comparison of robotic single-incision and traditional single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 30 (2016), 2276–2280.
31. 31 Newman, R.M., Umer, A., Bozzuto, B.J., Dilungo, J.L., Ellner, S., Surgical value of elective minimally invasive gallbladder removal: a cost analysis of traditional 4-port vs single-incision and robotically assisted cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 222 (2016), 303–308.
32. 32 Hanly, E.J., Talamini, M.A., Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 188:4 Supp1 (2004), 19S–26S.