Short-term outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 3089-3097

  Pietrabissa, Andrea ^a   Pugliese, Luigi ^a   Vinci, Alessio ^a   Peri, Andrea ^a   Tinozzi, Francesco Paolo ^a   Cavazzi, Emma ^a   Pellegrino, Eugenia ^a   Klersy, Catherine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^b FONDAZIONE IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN MATTEO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Robotic; Single site; Trial

Indexed keywords

KETOROLAC; PARACETAMOL; ROPIVACAINE; TRAMADOL;

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND INFECTION; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; AGED; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84945161980     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4601-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84(5):695
2. Joseph M, Phillips MR, Farrell TM, Rupp C (2012) Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: a review and a word of caution. Ann Surg 256(1):1–6
3. Garg P, Thakur JD, Singh I, Nain N, Mittal G, Gupta V (2012) A prospective controlled trial comparing single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: caution before damage control. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 22(3):220–225
4. Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G, Uccheddu A (2012) Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg. 16(9):1790–1801
5. Haber GP, White MA, Autorino R, Escobar PF, Kroh MD, Chalikonda S, Khanna R, Forest S, Yang B, Altunrende F, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH (2010) Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology 76(6):1279–1282
6. Escobar PF, Haber GP, Kaouk J, Kroh M, Chalikonda S, Falcone T (2011) Single-port surgery: laboratory experience with the daVinci single-site platform. JSLS 15(2):136–141
7. Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, Lucido FS, Priora F, Bianchi PP, Grosso F, Quarati R (2012) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy(SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 26:1648–1655
8. Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, Badessi F, Pugliese L, Vinci A, Klersy C, Spinoglio G (2012) Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 147(8):709–714
9. Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Paraskeva P, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Shah S (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216(6):1037–1047
10. Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, Chan KC, Cho CW, Cheung HY, Lee KW (2003) Two-port vs four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 17(10):1624–1627
11. Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Czerniach DR, Kaban GK, Khera S, Gallagher-Dorva KA, Callery MP, Litwin DE, Kelly JJ (2005) Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 140(12):1178–1183
12. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2001) Characteristics of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain 90(3):261–269
13. Cuschieri A (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 7(1):3–5
14. Greaves N, Nicholson J (2011) Single incision laparoscopic surgery in general surgery: a review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93(6):437–440
15. Pollard JS, Fung AK, Ahmed I (2012) Are natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision surgery viable techniques for cholecystectomy? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22(1):1–14
16. Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, Hammil CW, Hansen PD, Aliabadi-Wahle S (2011) Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 254(1):22–27
17. Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Paraskeva P, Rivas H, Soper N, Rosemurgy A, Shah S (2011) Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 201(3):369–372
18. Brown KM, Moore BT, Sorensen GB, Boettger CH, Tang F, Jones PG, Margolin DJ (2013) Patient-reported outcomes after single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective trial. Surg Endosc 27(9):3108–3115
19. Luna RA, Nogueira DB, Varela PS, Rodrigues Neto Ede O, Norton MJ, Ribeiro Ldo C, Peixoto AM, de Mendonca YL, Bendet I, Fiorelli RA, Dolan JP (2013) A prospective, randomized comparison of pain, inflammatory response, and short-termoutcomes between single port and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27(4):1254–1259
20. Gonzalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc 27(12):4524–4531
21. Hahn RA (1997) The nocebo phenomenon: concept, evidence, and implications for public health. Prev Med 26(5 Pt 1):607–611
22. Spiegel H (1997) Nocebo: the power of suggestibility. Prev Med 26(5 Pt 1):616–621
23. Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A (2012) Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 26(3):598–606
24. Buzad FA, Corne LM, Brown TC, Fagin RS, Hebert AE, Kaczmarek CA, Pack AN, Payne TN (2013) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: efficiency and cost analysis. Int J Med Robot. 9(3):365–370