A comparison of robotic single-incision and traditional single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 2276-2280

  Gustafson, Monica ^a   Lescouflair, Tariq ^b   Kimball, Randall ^c   Daoud, Ibrahim ^a  

^a SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^c Saratoga Center for General and Minimally Invasive Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Cholecystectomy; Costs; Human; Robotic; Technical

Indexed keywords

NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COST; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC ACCESS PORT; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SUTURE; TROCAR; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; ECONOMICS; HOSPITAL COST; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84949964936     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4223-9     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Roberts KE, Solomon D, Duffy AJ, Bell RL (2010) Sincle-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon’s initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 14:506–510
2. Gangl O, Hofer W, Tomaselli F, Sautner T, Függer R (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC): a matched-pair analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:819–824
3. Joseph S, Moore BT, Sorensen GB, Earley JW, Tang F, Jones P, Brown KM (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison with the gold standard. Surg Endosc 25:3008–3015
4. Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, DeNoto G, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Paraskeva P, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Shah S (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1048
5. Aprea G, Coppola BE, Guida F, Masone S, Persico G (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. J Surg Res 166:109–112
6. Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Morel P (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702
7. Bresadola F, Pasqualucci A, Donini A, Chiarandini P, Anania G, Terosu G, Sistu MA, Pasetto A (1999) Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 165:29–34
8. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A (2010) Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 24:1842–1848
9. Liric MM, Califano AD, Angelini P, Corcione F (2011) Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial. Am J Surg 202:45–52
10. ® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 26:2687–2694
11. Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, Chand B, Escobar P, Kaouk J, Chalikonda S (2011) First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc 25:3566–3573
12. Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, Lucido FS, Priora F, Bianchi PP, Grosso F, Quarati R (2012) Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 26:1648–1655
13. Wren SM, Curet MJ (2011) Single-port robotic cholecystectomy. Results from a First human use clinical study of the new da Vinci single-site surgical platform. Arch Surg 146:1122–1127
14. Gonzalez AM, Rabaza JR, Donkor C, Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Verdeja JC (2013) Single-incision cholecystectomy: a comparative study of standard laparoscopic, robotic, and SPIDER platforms. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3105-2