Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: A case-control study

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 164-170

  Gillen, Sonja ^a   Pletzer, Benedikt ^b   Heiligensetzer, Arthur ^b   Wolf, Petra ^a   Kleeff, Jörg ^a   Feussner, Hubertus ^a   Fürst, Alois ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b CARITAS KRANKENHAUS ST JOSEF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Camera holder; Cholecystectomy; Human robotic; Solo surgery; Surgical; Training

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; DEVICE SAFETY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; JOYSTICK CONTROLLED CAMERA HOLDER; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC VIDEO CAMERA; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATING ROOM PERSONNEL; OPERATING TABLE; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SATISFACTION; SEX; SOLO SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; WORK EXPERIENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892961908     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3142-x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cleary K, Nguyen C (2001) State of the art in surgical robotics: clinical applications and technology challenges. Comput Aided Surg 6: 312-328
2. Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q, Hibberd RD, Davies BL, Wickham JE, Nathan MS, Kundu B (1997) The Probot: an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 211: 317-325
3. Challacombe BJ, Khan MS, Murphy D, Dasgupta P (2006) The history of robotics in urology. World J Urol 24: 120-127
4. Broeders IA, Ruurda JP (2002) Robotics in laparoscopic surgery: current status and future perspectives. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 236: 76-80
5. Unger SW, Unger HM, Bass RT (1994) AESOP robotic armc. Surg Endosc 8: 1131
6. Okada S, Tanaba Y, Yamauchi H, Sato S (1998) Single-surgeon thoracoscopic surgery with a voice-controlled robot. Lancet 351: 1249
7. Aiono S, Gilbert JM, Soin B, Finlay PA, Gordan A (2002) Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16: 1267-1270
8. Polet R, Donnez J (2008) Using a laparoscope manipulator (LAPMAN) in laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Surg Technol Int 17: 187-191
9. Arezzo A, Testa T, Ulmer F, Schurr MO, Degregori M, Buess GF (2000) Positioning systems for endoscopic solo-surgery. Minerva Chir 55: 635-641
10. Geis WP, Kim HC, Brennan EJ Jr, McAfee PC, Wang Y (1996) Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures. Stud Health Technol Inform 29: 471-481
11. Gilbert JM (2009) The EndoAssist robotic camera holder as an aid to the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91: 389-393
12. Allaf ME, Jackman SV, Schulam PG, Cadeddu JA, Lee BR, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1998) Laparoscopic visual field: voice vs foot pedal interfaces for control of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 12: 1415-1418
13. Nebot PB, Jain Y, Haylett K, Stone R, McCloy R (2003) Comparison of task performance of the camera-holder robots Endo- Assist and Aesop. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13: 334-338
14. Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW (1995) Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 154: 2134-2136
15. Omote K, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A, Arbter K, Wei GQ, Siewert JR, Hirzinger G (1999) Self-guided robotic camera control for laparoscopic surgery compared with human camera control. Am J Surg 177: 321-324
16. Kraft BM, Jager C, Kraft K, Leibl BJ, Bittner R (2004) The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient? Surg Endosc 18: 1216-1223
17. Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring: review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16: 1389-1402
18. Jaspers JE, Breedveld P, Herder JL, Grimbergen CA (2004) Camera and instrument holders and their clinical value in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14: 145-152
19. Long JA, Descotes JL, Skowron O, Troccaz J, Cinquin P, Boillot B, Terrier N, Rambeaud JJ (2006) Use of robotics in laparoscopic urological surgery: state of the art. Prog Urol 16: 3-11
20. Yoshino I, Yasunaga T, Hashizume M, Maehara Y (2005) A novel endoscope manipulator, Naviot, enables solo-surgery to be performed during video-assisted thoracic surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 4: 404-405
21. Tanoue K, Yasunaga T, Kobayashi E, Miyamoto S, Sakuma I, Dohi T, Konishi K, Yamaguchi S, Kinjo N, Takenaka K, Maehara Y, Hashizume M (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a newly developed laparoscope manipulator for 10 patients with cholelithiasis. Surg Endosc 20: 753-756
22. Reichenspurner H, Boehm DH, Welz A, Schulze C, Zwissler B, Reichart B (1998) 3D-video- and robot-assisted minimally invasive ASD closure using the Port-Access techniques. Heart Surg Forum 1: 104-106
23. Kristin J, Geiger R, Knapp FB, Schipper J, Klenzner T (2011) Use of a mechatronic robotic camera holding system in head and neck surgery. HNO 59: 575-581
24. Herman B, Dehez B, Duy KT, Raucent B, Dombre E, Krut S (2009) Design and preliminary in vivo validation of a robotic laparoscope holder for minimally invasive surgery. Int J Med Robot 5: 319-326