Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: Efficiency and cost analysis

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 365-370

  Buzad, Francis A ^a   Corne, Louis M ^a   Brown, Thomas C ^a   Fagin, Randy S ^a   Hebert, April E ^a   Kaczmarek, Charles A ^a   Pack, Angie N ^a   Payne, Thomas N ^a  

^a Texas Institute for Robotic Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Cholecystectomy; Gall bladder disease; Gall bladder surgery; Laparoscopic single incision; Robotic single site; SILS

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTIC SURGERY;

CASE VOLUME; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; GALL BLADDER; GALL BLADDER DISEASE; GALL BLADDER SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SINGLE INCISION; ROBOTIC SINGLE SITE; SILS; SINGLE SITES;

COST EFFECTIVENESS;

ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHRONIC CHOLECYSTITIS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER TUMOR; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; PANCREATITIS; POLYP; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHOLECYSTECTOMY; GALL BLADDER DISEASE; GALL BLADDER SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SINGLE INCISION; ROBOTIC SINGLE SITE; SILS;

ADULT; AGED; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84883761864     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1507     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arroyo JP, Martin-Del-Campo LA, Torres-Villalobos G. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it a plausible alternative to the traditional four-port laparoscopic approach? Minim Invasive Surg 2012; 2012: 347607.
2. Ahmed I, Paraskeva P. A clinical review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Surgeon 2011; 9(6): 341-351.
3. Zhou YM, Wu LP, Zhao YF, et al. Single-incision vs conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis. Digest Dis Sci 2012; 57(8): 2103-2112.
4. Wang L, Liu B, Wu Z, et al. Comparison of single-surgeon series of transperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and standard laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Urology 2012; 79(3): 577-583.
5. Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW. Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2012; 255(4): 667-676.
6. Wong JS, Cheung YS, Fong KW, et al. Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective case-control study. Surg Laparo Endo Per 2012; 22(1): 25-28.
7. Barband A, Fakhree MB, Kakaei F, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using glove port in comparison with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy SILC using glove port. Surg Laparo Endosc Per 2012; 22(1): 17-20.
8. Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, et al. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2011; 202(3): 254-258.
9. Aprea G, Coppola Bottazzi E, Guida F, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) vs classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. J Surg Res 2011; 166(2): e109-112.
10. Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2011; 25(2): 367-377.
11. Pietrabissa A, Sbrana F, Morelli L, et al. Overcoming the challenges of single-incision cholecystectomy with robotic single-site technology. Arch Surg 2012; 147(8): 709-714.
12. Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, et al. Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site® robotic platform: early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(9): 2687-2694.
13. Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V, et al. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg Endosc 2011; 26(6): 1648-1655.
14. Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, et al. First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc 2011; 25(11): 3566-3573.
15. Morel P, Hagen ME, Bucher P, et al. Robotic single-port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience. J Gastroint Surg 2011; 15(12): 2182-2186.
16. Wren SM, Curet MJ. Single-port robotic cholecystectomy: results from a first human use clinical study of the new da Vinci Single-Site surgical platform. Arch Surg 2011; 146(10): 1122-1127.
17. Payne TN, Pitter MC. Robotic-assisted surgery for the community gynecologist: can it be adopted? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 54(3): 391-411.
18. Morel P, Pugin F, Bucher P, et al. Robotic single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Robot Surg 2012; 6(3): 273-274.
19. Judd JP, Siddiqui NY, Barnett JC, et al. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invas Gynecol 2010; 17(4): 493-499.
20. Yeo D, Mackay S, Martin D. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiography and common bile duct exploration via the umbilical port. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(4): 1122-1127.
21. Bagloo MB, Dakin GF, Mormino LP, et al. Single-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy with routine intraoperative cholangiogram. Surg Endosc 2011; 25(5): 1683-1688.
22. Bresadola F, Pasqualucci A, Donini A, et al. Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 1999; 165(1): 29-34.
23. Piskun G, Rajpal S. Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999; 9(4): 361-364.
24. Soma T, Sugano M, Ito T, et al. Obama system: a new easy, safe, and economical technique for laparoscopic single-port surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg 2012; 5(1): 1-4.
25. Ross S, Rosemurgy A, Albrink M, et al. Consensus statement of the Consortium for LESS Cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(10): 2711-2716.