Single-port versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 815-831

  Qiu, Jianguo ^a   Yuan, Haichao ^a   Chen, Shuting ^a   He, Zhiliang ^b   Han, Ping ^a   Wu, Hong ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; BILE DUCT INJURY; BILE LEAKAGE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; GALLBLADDER DISEASE; HEMATOMA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; MULTIPORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; SURGICAL INFECTION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; GALLBLADDER DISEASES; HUMANS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84885026041     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2013.0040     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Suuronen S, Koski A, Nordstrom P, et al. Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in surgical training. Dig Surg 2010;27:384-390.
2. Damiani G, Pinnarelli L, Sammarco A, et al. Postoperative pulmonary function in open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis of the Tiffenau index. Dig Surg 2008;25:1-7.
3. D?az D, Can on IC, Fierro F, et al. Initial experience in single site laparoscopic surgery in a pediatric hospital of Bogota [in Spanish]. Cir Pediatr 2011;24:228-231.
4. Chang SK, Tan SS, Kok YO. Early experience in single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Singapore Med J 2012;53:377-380.
5. Feinberg EJ, Agaba E, Feinberg ML, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy learning curve experience seen in a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:114-117.
6. Garg P, Tharani S, Thakur JD, et al. Cosmetic outcome is an important parameter when comparing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Surg Endosc 2012;26: 2998-2999.
7. Rubay R, Hauters P, Valverde A, et al. Single umbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Results of the prospective trial of the Coelio Club. J Visc Surg 2012;149: 417-420.
8. Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Desiderio J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2013;100:191-208.
9. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, et al. Singleincision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1205-1213.
10. Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 2012;36:2644-2653.
11. Wang D, Wang Y, Ji ZL. Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. ANZ J Surg 2012;82:303-310.
12. Song T, Liao B, Liu J, Yin Y, et al. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review of available data. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:e190-e196.
13. MacLehose RR, Reeves BC, Harvey IM, et al. A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies. Health Technol Assess 2000;4:1-154.
14. Abraham NS, Byrne CJ, Young JM, et al. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:238-245.
15. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:65-94.
16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Reprint-Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Phys Ther 2009;89:873-880.
17. Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P, et al. Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:745-753.
18. Clarke M, Horton R. Bringing it all together: Lancet- Cochrane collaborate on systematic reviews. Lancet 2001; 357:1728.
19. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-2012.
20. Philipp SR, Brent W, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: Early experience in comparison with the gold standard. J Am Coll Surg 2009;209:632-637.
21. Vidal O, Valentini M, Espert JJ, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: A safe and reproducible alternative. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:599-602.
22. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KT, Pappas-Gogos G, et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1842-1848.
23. Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2010;97:1007-1012.
24. Fronza JS, Linn JG, Nagle AP, et al. A single institution's experience with single incision cholecystectomy compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 2010;148: 731-734.
25. Thapa PB, Maharjan DK, Singh DR. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs conventional cholecystectomy i n developing country. J Nepal Med Assoc 2010;49:216-219.
26. Zahid M, Anis S, Nasir A, et al. Four port versus single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Pak 2010;15: 122-125.
27. Khambaty F, Brody F, Vaziri K, et al. Laparoscopic versus single-incision cholecystectomy. World J Surg 2011;35:967-972.
28. Jacob D, Raakow R. Single-port versus multi-port cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis: A retrospective comparative analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2011; 10:521-525.
29. Aprea G, Bottazzi EC, Guida F, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized prospective study. J Surg Res 2011;166:109-112.
30. Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 2011;201:369-373.
31. Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GQ, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2011;254:22-27.
32. Lirici MM, Califano AD, Angelini P, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Results of a pilot randomized trial. Am J Surg 2011;202:45-52.
33. Lai ECH, Yang GPC, Tang CN, et al. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2011;202:254-258.
34. Cao GZ, Cai WC, Qin MF, et al. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Short-term operative outcomes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011;21:311-313.
35. Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2011;98:1695-1702.
36. Asakuma M, Hayashi M, Komeda K, et al. Impact of singleport cholecystectomy on postoperative pain. Br J Surg 2011;98:991-995.
37. Chandler NM, Danielson PD. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children: A retrospective comparison with traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:1695-1699.
38. Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginesta C, et al. Single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparison of surgical outcomes from a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011;21:683-686.
39. Garcia-Henriquez N, Shah SR, Kane TD. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in children using standard straight instruments: A surgeon's early experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011;21:555-559.
40. Prasad A, Mukherjee KA, Kaul S, et al. Postoperative pain after cholecystectomy: Conventional laparoscopy versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg 2011;7:24-27.
41. Gangl O, Hofer W, Tomaselli F, et al. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)-A matched pair analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011;396:819-824.
42. Wu SD, Han JY, Tian Y. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011;21:25-28.
43. McGregor CG, Sodergren MH, Aslanyan A, et al. Evaluating systemic stress response in single port vs. multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:614-622.
44. Culp BL, Cedillo VE, Arnold DT. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional four-port cholecystectomy. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2012;25:319-323.
45. Reibetanz J, Ickrath P, Hain J, et al. Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus standard multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A case-control study comparing the longterm quality of life and body image. Surg Today 2013;43: 1025-1030.
46. Madureira FA, Manso JE, Madureira FD, et al. Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2013;27:1009-1015.
47. Beck C, Eakin J, Dettorre R, et al. Analysis of perioperative factors and cost comparison of single-incision and traditional multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2013;27:104-108.
48. Leung D, Yetasook AK, Carbray J, et al. Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-oflife scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized blinded comparison. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215:702-708.
49. Sasaki K, Watanabe G, Matsuda M, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparison analysis of feasibility and safety. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:108-113.
50. Karim MA, Ahmed J, Mansour M, et al. Single incision vs. conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy:A comparison of two approaches. Int J Surg 2012;10:368-372.
51. Jung GO, Park DE, Chae KM. Clinical results between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional 3- port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Prospective casematched analysis in single institution. J Korean Surg Soc 2012;83:374-380.
52. Chang SK, Wang YL, Shen L, et al. Interim report: A randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 2013;6:14-20.
53. Zheng M, Qin M, Zhao H. Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2012;21:113-117.
54. Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, et al. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2012;26: 1296-1303.
55. Sinan H, Demirbas S, Ozer MT, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:12-16.
56. Kim BS, Kim KC, Choi YB. A comparison between singleincision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012;22:443-447.
57. Garg P, Thakur JD, Singh IM, et al. A prospective controlled trial comparing single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Caution before damage control. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:220-225.
58. Wong JSW, Cheung YSF, Fong KW, et al. Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Prospective case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:25-28.
59. Sasaki A, Ogawa M, Tono C. Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:396-399.
60. Ikeda O, Sakaguchi Y, Toh Y, et al. Evaluation of oncological adequacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with special attention to lymph node dissection: A comparison with conventional open gastrectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2012;59:627-632.
61. Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, et al. Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: A critical appraisal. Arch Surg 2011;146:348-356.
62. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, et al. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84:1627.
63. Conzo G, Napolitano S, Candela G, et al. Iatrogenic bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Myth or reality? A recent literature review from 2006 to 2011. In Tech. 2012. http://www.intechopen (accessed December 31, 2012).
64. Joseph M, Phillips MR, Farrell TM, et al. Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a higher bile duct injury rate: A review and a word of caution. Ann Surg 2012;256:1-6.
65. Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2012;255:1048-1059.