Social dominance, moral politics, and gifted education

Roeper Review

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 21-29

  Cross, Jennifer Riedl ^a   Cross, Tracy L ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007849869     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190509554333     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969). Object relations, dependency and attachment: A theoretical view of the infant-mother relationship. Child Development, 40, 969-1025.
2. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1984). Attachment. In N. S. Endler & J. McV. Hunt (Eds.), Personality and the behavioral disorders (pp. 559-602). New York: Wiley.
3. Aronson, E. & Bridgeman, D. (1979). Jigsaw groups and the desegregated classroom: In pursuit of common goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 438-45.
4. Baker, B. D., & Richards, C. E. (1998). Equity through vouchers: The special case of gifted children. Educational Policy, 12, 363-379.
5. Baumrind, D. (1971). Harmonious parents and their preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 41, 92-102.
6. Beck, E. L., Whitley, D. M., & Wolk, J. L. (1999). Legislators' perceptions about poverty: Views from the Georgia General Assembly, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 26(2), 87-104.
7. Boldry, J. G., & Kashy, D. A. (1999). Intergroup perception in naturally occurring groups of differential status: A social relations perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1200-1212.
8. Borland, J. H. (2003). The death of giftedness: Gifted education without gifted children. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking Gifted Education (pp. 105-124). New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Borland, J. H., Horton, D., Subotnik, R. F., Chen, S-J., Chun, M., Freeman, C., Goldberg, S., & Yu, J. (Eds.). (2002). A quarter century of ideas on ability grouping and acceleration [Special Issue]. Roeper Review, 24(3).
10. Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child's tie to his mother. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 39, 350-73.
11. Branch, C, & Newcomb, N. (1980). Racial attitudes of Black preschoolers as related to parental civil rights activism. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 26, 425-428.
12. Cable News Network. (2005). Election results. Retrieved April 27, 2005 from http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html
13. Cassady, J. C., Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Adams, C. M., Cross, T. L., Dixon, F. A., & Pierce, R. L. (2004). The Differentiated Classroom Observation Scale. Roeper Review, 26(3), 139-146.
14. Clark, K. B., & Clark, M. P. (1947). Racial identification and preference in Negro children. In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 169-178). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
15. Coleman, L. J. (2004). Is consensus on a definition in the field possible, desirable, necessary? Roeper Review, 27(1), 10-11.
16. Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2001). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
17. Cross, T. L. (2003). Leaving no gifted child behind: Breaking our educational system of privilege. Roeper Review, 25, 101-102.
18. Cross, T. L., & Coleman, L. J. (in press). School-Based Conception of Giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Conceptions of Giftedness (2nd ed.). London: Oxford Press.
19. Dai, D. Y., & Renzulli, J. S. (2000). Dissociation and integration of talent development and personal growth: Comments and suggestions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(4), 247-251.
20. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C-Y., Hong, Y-Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-286.
21. Ford, D. Y., Harris, J. J., Tyson, C. A., & Trotman, M. F. (2002). Beyond deficit thinking: Providing access for gifted African American students. Roeper Review, 24(2), 52-58.
22. Gagné, F. (2004). An imperative, but, alas, improbable consensus! Roeper Review, 27(1), 12T14.
23. Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Unthinkable thoughts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(1), 5-12.
24. Grant, B. A., & Piechowski, M. M. (1999). Theories and the good: Toward child-centered gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(1), 4-12.
25. Grantham, T. C. (2002). Straight talk on the issue of underrepresentation: An interview with Dr. Mary M. Frasier. Roeper Review, 24(2), 50-51.
26. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: The Free Press.
27. Jensen, A.R. (1985). The nature of the black-white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 8, 193-219.
28. Karen, R. (1994). Becoming attached: Unfolding the mystery of the infant-mother bond and its impact on later life. New York: Warner Books.
29. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, P. M. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans ' views of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
30. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Harper- Perennial.
31. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
33. Lakoff, G. (2003). Framing the Dems: How conservatives control political debate and how progressives can take it back. The American Prospect, 8(14), 32-35.
34. Larew, J. (2003) Why are droves of unqualified, unprepared kids getting into our top colleges? Because their dads are alumni. In K. E. Rosenblum & T. C.Travis (Eds.) The meaning of difference: American constructions of race, sex and gender, social class, and sexual orientation (3rd ed., pp. 300-305). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
35. Levin, S. L. (1996). A social psychological approach to understanding intergroup attitudes in the United States and Israel. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, UCLA.
36. Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parentchild interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & E. M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.) Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (4th ed., pp. 1-101). New York: Wiley.
37. Nelson, T. D. (2002). The psychology of prejudice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
38. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. (1993). National Excellence: A Case for Developing America's Talent. Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
39. Peine, M. E. (2003). Doing grounded theory research with gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(3), 184-200.
40. Pratto, F., & Choudhury, P. (1998). A group status analysis of in-group identification and support for group inequality: Ethnicity, sex, and sexual orientation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.
41. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
42. Robinson, A. (1990). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14(3), 9-27, 31-36.
43. Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. (Eds.) (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
45. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797-811.
47. Sue, D. W. (2004). Making the invisible visible. American Psychologist, 59, 761-769.
48. Terman, L.M. (1930). Genetic studies of genius, Vol. III: The promise of youth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49. U. S. Department of Education. (1991). National educational longitudinal study 88: Final report: Gifted and talented education programs for eighth grade public school students. Washington, DC: Author.