The differentiated classroom observation scale

Roeper Review

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 139-146

  Cassady, Jerrell C ^a   Speirs Neumeister, Kristie L ^a   Adams, Cheryll M ^a   Cross, Tracy L ^a   Dixon, Felicia A ^a   Pierce, Rebecca L ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958110916     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190409554259     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adams, C. M. 2001. Critical questions about tiered lessons. Images: Journal of the Indiana Association for the Gified, 15(1) Winter: 7-9.
2. Adams, C. M. and Pierce, R. L. 2002. Differentiated instruction through tiered lessons in mathematics. Ohio Journal of Mathematics, 45 April: 24-27.
3. Adams, C. M. and Pierce, R. L. in press. Differentiating science instruction through tiered lessons: Meeting the needs of all learners. Science and Children,
4. Anderson, L. and Krathwohl, D. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
5. Drew, C. J., Hardman, M. L. and Hart, A. W. 1996. Designing and conducting research: Inquiry in education and social science, 2nd ed., Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Feldhusen, J. and Huffman, L. 1988. Practicum experiences in an education program for teachers of the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12: 34-45.
7. Gallagher, J. 2002. Gifted education in the 21 st century. Gifted Education International, 16: 100-110.
8. Gentry, M. L. 1999. Promoting student achievement and exemplary classroom practice practices through cluster grouping: A research-based alternative to heterogeneous elementary classrooms, Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
9. Johnsen, S., Haensly, P., Ryser, G. and Ford, R. 2002. Changing general education classroom practices to adapt for gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46: 45-63.
10. Johnson, D. and Johnson, R. 2002. Meaningful assessment, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
11. Johnson, D., Johnson, R. and Holubec, E. 1998. Cooperation in the classroom, 6th ed., Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
12. Kulieke, M. 1986. The role of evaluation in inservice and staff development for educators of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30: 140-144.
13. Rogers, K. 2001. Reforming Gifted Education, Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Pres.
14. Rossi, P., Reeman, H. and Wright, S. 1979. Evaluation as a systematic approach, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Tomlinson, C. 2001a. Differentiated instruction in the regular classroom: What does it mean? How does it look?. Understanding Our Gifted, 14: 3-6.
16. Tomlinson, C. 2001b. How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms, 2nd ed., Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
17. Tomlinson, C., Kaplan, S., Renzulli, J., Purcell, J., Leppien, J. and Bums, D. 2002. The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high ability learners, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
18. Westberg, K., Archambault, F., Dobyns, S. and Salvin, T. 1993. An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms, (Research Monograph No. 93104) National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, The University of Connecticut.