A brief review of literature on immediate feedback studies in CALL

Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 262-268

  Anitha Devi, V ^a   Revathi, K ^a  

^a VIT UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Computer; Education; Feedback; Self Study; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007553957     PISSN: None     EISSN: 09752935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21659/rupkatha.v8n3.27     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Abberton, E., &Fourcin, A. (1975). Visual feedback and the acquisition of intonation. In E. H. Lenneberg, & E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Foundations of language development( New York: Academic Press.
2. Acharya, M.D. (2005). Effectiveness of games, work-card and self-instructional material on English language learning.Ph.D.(Edu.), Saurashtra University.
3. Aljaafreh, A., &Lantolf, J.P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development.The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483.
4. Allwright, R.L. (1975). Problems in the Study of the Language Teachers Treatment of Learner Error.In Marina K. Burt and Heidi C. Dulay (Eds). New Directions in Second Language Learning, Teaching and Bilingual Education.Washington DC. TESOL.96-109.
5. Anderson-Hsieh, J. (1994). Interpreting visual feedback on suprasegmentals in computer assisted pronunciation instruction. The CALICO Journal.
6. Anderson, R. C., Kulhavy, R. W., & Andre, T. (1971).Feedback procedures in programmed instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 148-156. doi:10.1037/h0030766
7. Aoda, B, Astardas A. (2012). Language and identity policies in the glocalage. (Barcelona: Department of Governacio.
8. Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the passé compose and the imparfait. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 226-243.
9. Azevedo, Roger; Bernard, Robert M. (1995). The Effects of Computer-Presented Feedback on Learning from Computer-Based Instruction: A Meta-Analysis. 24p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 18-22.
10. Badiyani, I. M.(2005). Development and Try-out of Computer Aided Language Learning (CALL) Package for Teaching of Action Verbs in English Language.M.Ed., Saurashtra University.
11. Braidi, S.M. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions.Language Learning, 52(1), 1-42.
12. Bright, D. E., Verano, M., &Cubero, R.A (1991). From theory to practice: A model for an interactive videodisc lesson. In M. D. Bush, A. Slaton, M. Verano, & M. E. Slayden (Eds.), Interactive videodisc: The "Why" and the "How."CALICO Monograph Series, Vol. 2, Provo, UT: Brigham Young Press.
13. Brooks, N. (1960). Language and language learning: Theory and practice. (New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
14. Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., &Roediger, H. L., III (2007).The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 273-281. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.13.4.273
15. Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., &Roediger, H. L., III (2008).Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback enhances retention of low confidence correct responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 918-928. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918
16. Butler, A. C., &Roediger, H. L., III (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 604-616. doi:10.3758/MC.36 .3.604
17. Carpenter, H., Jeon, K.S., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners' interpretations of recasts.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 209-236.
18. Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Chaudhary, M. S.(2007). A Comparative Study of Programmed Learning and ComputerAssisted Learning on Direct-Indirect Speech for the Students of Std-IX in English.M.Ed., Hemchandrachayra North Gujarat University.
20. Chaudron, Craig. (1977). "A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors". Language Learning 27 (1): 29-46.
21. Cunningham, D. (1998). 25 years of technology in language teaching: A personal experience. Babel: Journal of the Australian Federation of Modern Language Teachers' Associations 33(1): 5-7.
22. de Bot, K. (1983). Visual feedback of intonation: Effectiveness and induced practice behaviour. Language and Speech, 26(4), 331-350.
23. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998).Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). (New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Dulay, H.C., & Burt, M.K. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23(2), 245-258.
25. Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K.Natural (1974). sequences in child second language acquisition.Language learning, 24(1), 37-53.
26. Egbert, Joy, Trena M. Paulus, and Yoko Nakamichi. (2003). "The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education." Language Learning & Technology 6.3: 108-126.
27. Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Referred to by Foth&Dewaele, 2002, 178
28. Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91-113
29. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Ferreira, Anita, Johanna D. Moore, and Chris Mellish.(2007). "A Study of Feedback Strategies in Foreign Language Classrooms and Tutorials with Implications for Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Learning Systems."IJ Artificial Intelligence in Education 17.4: 389-422.
31. Fotos, S.S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar con-sciousness-raising tasks.TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 323-351.
32. Garrett, N. (1995). ICALL and Second Language Acquisition. In V. Holland, J. Kaplan & M. Sams (Eds.) Intelligent Language Tutors: Theory shaping technology (pp. 348-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
33. Grace, C. A. (2000). Gender differences: Vocabulary retention and access to translationsfor beginning language learners in CALL. Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 214-224.
34. Graesser, A., Lu, S., Jackson, G., Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., &Louwerse, M. (2004).Auto tutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language.Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 180-193.
35. Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output.TESOLQuarterly, 36(4), 543-572.
36. Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 255-270.
37. Hendrickson, J. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. Modern Language Journal, 62, 387-398.
38. Heift, Trude. (2004). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake in CALL.ReCALL, v16 n2 p416-431
39. Hokanson, B. (2000). Digital image creation and analysis as a means to examine learning and cognition. Paper presented at the Association of Educational Computing and Technology Conference, Long Beach, CA.
40. Hossler, D and Scalese-Love, P (1989). Grounded Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Research Synthesis, The Review of Higher Education, Vol 13, No 1, pp. 1-28
41. Hoven, D.A. (2000). Model for listening and viewing comprehension in multimedia environments.Language Learning and Technology.http://hdl.handle.net/2149/1682
42. Groot, Peter JM. (2010). "Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition."Language Learning & Technology 4.1.
43. Hyland, Ken & Hyland, Fiona. (20006). Feedback in Second Language Writing. London: Cambridge University Press.
44. Iraji, Samira et al.(2014). Corrective Feedback and Learners Uptake across Gender in an EFL Context.Procedia, Volume 98, Page 680-687.
45. Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 1-36.
46. Kang, S.-H., & Dennis, J. R. (1995). The effects of computer-enhanced vocabulary on achievement of ESL grade school children. Computers in the Schools, 11(3), 25-35.
47. Klein, P.S. (2000).A Mediational Approach to Early Intervention. In A. Kozulin and Y. Rand (Eds), Experience of Mediated Learning: An Impact of Feuersteins Theory in Education and Psychology (pp.240-56). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
48. Krashen, S.(1981). The "fundamental pedagogical principle" in second language teaching.StudiaLinguistica, 35(1-2), 50-70.
49. Krashen, S. (1982).Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
50. Kulik, J. A., &Kulik, C. C. (1988).Timing of feedback and verbal learning.Review of Educational Research, 58, 79-97.
51. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J.M. (2005). Error correction: Students' versus teachers' perceptions. Language Awareness, 14(2-3), 112-127.
52. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 37-63.
53. Lavolette, Elizabeth et al. (2015). The Accuracy of Computer Feedback and Students Response to it.Language and Learning Technology, Volume 19, number 2, pp.50-68.
54. Liou, H.-C., Wang, S. H., & Hung-Yeh, Y. (1992). Can grammatical CALL help EFL writing instruction? CALICO Journal, 10(1), 23-43.
55. Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1994).The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10(4), 419-434.
56. Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1995). The effect of hypermedia-Assisted-instruction on second language learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 159-175.
57. Liu, M. (1995). Contextual enrichment through hypermedia technology: Implications for second language learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(3/4), 439-450.
58. Lhyle, K. G., &Kulhavy, R. W. (1987).Feedback processing and error correction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 320-322. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.320
59. Lyster, R. (1998a). Negotiation of Form, Recasts, and Explicit Correction in Relation to Error Types and Learner Repair in Immersion Classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2):182-218.
60. Lyster, R. (1998b). Recasts, Repetition, and Ambiguity in L2 Classroom Discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
61. Mallikarjun, B. (2003) Use of Folk Literature from a Pedagogical Perspective. Language in India. Volume 3: 12 December 2003.
62. Maheta, H. B. (2007). Development and Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction Programme for Teaching of Adjective in English Language.M.Ed., Saurashtra University.
63. Merlet, S. (2000).Understanding multimedia dialogues in a foreign language.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(2), 148-159.
64. Metcalfe, J., &Kornell, N. (2007). Principles of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors, and feedback. PsychonomicBulletin& Review, 14, 225-229.
65. Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N., & Son, L. K. (2007). A cognitive-science based programme to enhance study efficacy in a high and low risk setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 743-768. doi:10.1080/09541440701326063
66. Metcalfe, Janet, Nate Kornell, and BridgidFinn.(2009). "Delayed versus immediate feedback in childrens and adults vocabulary learning."Memory& Cognition 37.8 1077-1087.
67. Nagata, N. (1993). Intelligent Compute Feedback for Second Language Instruction.(The Modern Language Journal.
68. Nagata, N. (1993). Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction.Modern Language Journal, 77(3), 331-339.
69. Nagata, N. (1995). A study of consciousness-raising by computer: The effect of metalinguistic feedback on second language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28(3), 337-347.
70. Nagata, N. (1996). Computer vs. Workbook Instruction in Second Language Acquisition.CALICO Journal, 14(1), 53-75.
71. Nagata, N. (1997). The effectiveness of computer-Assisted metalinguistic instruction: Acase study in Japanese. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2), 187-200.
72. Nutta, J. (1998). Is computer-based grammar instruction as effective as teacher-directed grammar instruction for teaching L2 structures? CALICO Journal, 16(1), 49-62.
73. Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
74. Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005).When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 3-8. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.3
75. Plakans, L. (2001). Incorporating ESOL Learners Feedback and Usability Testing in Instructor Developed CALL Materials. TESOL Journal 10, 15-20.
76. Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., &Leutner, D. (2003).Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 221-243.
77. Rathod, R.P. (2000). Preparation and try-out of programme learning of selected topic of std-IX in English grammar.M.Ed., North Gujarat University.
78. Robinson G, Underwood J, Rivers W, Hernandez J, Rudisill C &Ensenat C (1985) ComputerAssisted Instruction in Foreign Language Education: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Methodologies and Different Forms of Error Correction San Francisco: Center for Language and Cross-cultural Skills. ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 262626.
79. Sakhiya, R. B.(2006). Effectiveness work-card and programmed learning as a self-learning techniques with reference to teaching of English grammar. Ph.D. (Edu.), Saurashtra University.
80. Salaberry, M. R. (1996). A theoretical foundation for the development of pedagogical tasks in computer mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 14(1), 5-36.
81. Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: Aretrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 39-56.
82. Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center
83. Schulze, Mathias (2003).Grammatical Errors and Feedback: Some Theoretical Insights. Calico Journal, Volume 20, No 3.
84. Seedhouse, P. (1997). The case of missing no: The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning, 47, 547-583.
85. Shetzer, Heidi and Mark Warschauer. (2000). An Electronic Literacy Approach to Network-based Language Teaching. In Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice, ed., Mark Warschauer and Richard Kern, 171-185. New York: Cambridge University Press
86. Thornton, P., & Houser, C.(2005).Using mobile phones in English Education in Japan.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 217-228.
87. Warschauer, M., Turbee, L., & Roberts, B. (1996). Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System, 24(1), 1-14.
88. Zyoud.M.M (1999). Development of Computer-Assisted English Language Teaching for VIII standard Students.PhD Thesis. Vadodara: CASE. The Sayajirao University of Baroda.