Disentangling Interactions in the Microbiome: A Network Perspective

Trends in Microbiology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 217-228

  Layeghifard, Mehdi ^a   Hwang, David M ^b,c   Guttman, David S ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

keystone species; microbial clusters; microbial interactions; microbiome; network

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COEVOLUTION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DYSBIOSIS; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; HUMAN; INTESTINE FLORA; KEYSTONE SPECIES; METAGENOME; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIOME; MIXED INFECTION; NETWORK LEARNING; NONHUMAN; PROBABILITY THEORY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; MICROBIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; MICROFLORA; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MICROBIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; MICROBIOTA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 85007441159     PISSN: 0966842X     EISSN: 18784380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.008     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. 1 Hooper, L.V., et al. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science 336 (2012), 1268–1273.
2. 2 Thaiss, C.A., et al. The microbiome and innate immunity. Nature 535 (2016), 65–74.
3. 3 Hacquard, S., et al. Microbiota and host nutrition across plant and animal kingdoms. Cell Host Microbe 17 (2015), 603–616.
4. 4 Pop, M., et al. Diarrhea in young children from low-income countries leads to large-scale alterations in intestinal microbiota composition. Genome Biol., 15, 2014, R76.
5. 5 Gülden, E., et al. The gut microbiota and Type 1 Diabetes. Clin. Immunol. 159 (2015), 143–153.
6. 6 Yu, Y-N., Fang, J-Y., Gut microbiota and colorectal cancer. Gastrointest. Tumors 2 (2015), 26–32.
7. 7 Morgan, X.C., et al. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biol., 13, 2012, R79.
8. 8 Jalanka-Tuovinen, J., et al. Faecal microbiota composition and host–microbe cross-talk following gastroenteritis and in postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 63 (2014), 1737–1745.
9. 9 Perry, R.J., et al. Acetate mediates a microbiome–brain–β-cell axis to promote metabolic syndrome. Nature 534 (2016), 213–217.
10. 10 Stecher, B., et al. Gut inflammation can boost horizontal gene transfer between pathogenic and commensal Enterobacteriaceae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 (2012), 1269–1274.
11. 11 Rodrigues Hoffmann, A., et al. The microbiome: the trillions of microorganisms that maintain health and cause disease in humans and companion animals. Vet. Pathol. 53 (2016), 10–21.
12. 12 Hansen, T.H., et al. The gut microbiome in cardio-metabolic health. Genome Med., 7, 2015, 33.
13. 13 Rogers, G.B., et al. Interpreting infective microbiota: the importance of an ecological perspective. Trends Microbiol. 21 (2013), 271–276.
14. 14 Passos da Silva, D., et al. Bacterial multispecies studies and microbiome analysis of a plant disease. Microbiol. Read. Engl. 160 (2014), 556–566.
15. 15 Dalton, T., et al. An in vivo polymicrobial biofilm wound infection model to study interspecies interactions. PloS One, 6, 2011, e27317.
16. 16 Murray, J.L., et al. Mechanisms of synergy in polymicrobial infections. J. Microbiol. Seoul Korea 52 (2014), 188–199.
17. 17 Proulx, S.R., et al. Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 (2005), 345–353.
18. 18 Faust, K., Raes, J., Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10 (2012), 538–550.
19. 19 Faust, K., et al. Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput. Biol., 8, 2012, e1002606.
20. 20 Lima-Mendez, G., et al. Determinants of community structure in the global plankton interactome. Science, 348, 2015, 1262073.
21. 21 Arumugam, M., et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473 (2011), 174–180.
22. 22 Barberán, A., et al. Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. ISME J. 6 (2012), 343–351.
23. 23 Copeland, J.K., et al. Seasonal community succession of the phyllosphere microbiome. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact. 28 (2015), 274–285.
24. 24 Chen, E.Z., Li, H., A two-part mixed-effects model for analyzing longitudinal microbiome compositional data. Bioinformatics 32 (2016), 2611–2617.
25. 25 Weiss, S., et al. Correlation detection strategies in microbial data sets vary widely in sensitivity and precision. ISME J. 10 (2016), 1669–1681.
26. 26 van den Bergh, M.R., et al. Associations between pathogens in the upper respiratory tract of young children: interplay between viruses and bacteria. PloS One, 7, 2012, e47711.
27. 27 Mitra, K., et al. Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14 (2013), 719–732.
28. 28 Freeman, L.C., Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1 (1978), 215–239.
29. 29 Brandes, U., A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J. Math. Sociol. 25 (2001), 163–177.
30. 30 Bonacich, P., Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am. J. Sociol. 92 (1987), 1170–1182.
31. 31 Bauer, F., Lizier, J.T., Identifying influential spreaders and efficiently estimating infection numbers in epidemic models: a walk counting approach. EPL Europhys. Lett., 99, 2012, 68007.
32. 32 Sikic, M., et al. Epidemic centrality - is there an underestimated epidemic impact of network peripheral nodes?. Eur. Phys. J. B, 86, 2013, 440.
33. 33 Berry, D., Widder, S., Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks. Microb. Symbioses, 5, 2014, 219.
34. 34 Viana, M.P., et al. Accessibility in networks: A useful measure for understanding social insect nest architecture. Chaos Solitons Fractals 46 (2013), 38–45.
35. 35 Lawyer, G., Understanding the spreading power of all nodes in a network. Sci. Rep., 5, 2014, 8665.
36. 36 Brin, S., Page, L., The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on World Wide Web 7, Amsterdam, 1998, 107–117.
37. 37 Kleinberg, J.M., Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. JACM 46 (1999), 604–632.
38. 38 Faith, J.J., et al. The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota. Science, 341, 2013, 1237439.
39. 39 Cho, I., et al. Antibiotics in early life alter the murine colonic microbiome and adiposity. Nature 488 (2012), 621–626.
40. 40 David, L.A., et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505 (2014), 559–563.
41. 41 Xia, L.C., et al. Efficient statistical significance approximation for local similarity analysis of high-throughput time series data. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 29 (2013), 230–237.
42. 42 Xia, L.C., et al. Extended local similarity analysis (eLSA) of microbial community and other time series data with replicates. BMC Syst. Biol. 5 (2011), 1–12.
43. 43 Ruan, Q., et al. Local similarity analysis reveals unique associations among marine bacterioplankton species and environmental factors. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 22 (2006), 2532–2538.
44. 44 Eiler, A., et al. Coherent dynamics and association networks among lake bacterioplankton taxa. ISME J. 6 (2012), 330–342.
45. 45 McGeachie, M.J., et al. Longitudinal prediction of the infant gut microbiome with dynamic Bayesian networks. Sci. Rep., 6, 2016, 20359.
46. 46 Faust, K., et al. Metagenomics meets time series analysis: unraveling microbial community dynamics. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 25 (2015), 56–66.
47. 47 Murray, J.S., et al. Bayesian Gaussian copula factor models for mixed data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 108 (2013), 656–665.
48. 48 Žitnik, M., Zupan, B., Data fusion by matrix factorization. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 37 (2015), 41–53.
49. 49 Žitnik, M., et al. Discovering disease-disease associations by fusing systems-level molecular data. Sci. Rep., 3, 2013, 3202.
50. 50 Žitnik, M., Zupan, B., Matrix factorization-based data fusion for drug-induced liver injury prediction. Syst. Biomed. 2 (2014), 16–22.
51. 51 Žitnik, M., Zupan, B., Gene network inference by fusing data from diverse distributions. Bioinformatics 31 (2015), i230–i239.
52. 52 Erdős, P., Rényi, A., On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci. 5 (1960), 17–61.
53. 53 Barabási, A-L., Albert, R., Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286 (1999), 509–512.
54. 54 Nafis, S., et al. Apoptosis regulatory protein–protein interaction demonstrates hierarchical scale-free fractal network. Brief. Bioinform. 16 (2014), 675–699.
55. 55 Teschendorff, A.E., et al. Increased signaling entropy in cancer requires the scale-free property of protein interaction networks. Sci. Rep., 5, 2015, 9646.
56. 56 Li, L., et al. Towards a theory of Scale-free graphs: definition, properties, and implications. Internet Math. 2 (2005), 431–523.
57. 57 Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H., Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393 (1998), 440–442.
58. 58 Humphries, M.D., Gurney, K., Network “small-world-ness”: a quantitative method for determining canonical network equivalence. PLoS One, 3, 2008, e2051.
59. 59 Ma, S., et al. An Arabidopsis gene network based on the graphical Gaussian model. Genome Res. 17 (2007), 1614–1625.
60. 60 Wille, A., Bühlmann, P., Low-order conditional independence graphs for inferring genetic networks. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol., 5, 2006, 1.
61. 61 Kurtz, Z.D., et al. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks. PLoS Comput. Biol., 11, 2015, e1004226.
62. 62 Friedman, J., Alm, E.J., Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput. Biol., 8, 2012, e1002687.
63. 63 Bell, T.A.S., et al. A lipid-accumulating alga maintains growth in outdoor, alkaliphilic raceway pond with mixed microbial communities. Microbiotechnology Ecotoxicol. Bioremediation, 6, 2016, 1480.
64. 64 Costea, P.I., et al. A fair comparison. Nat. Methods, 11, 2014 359-3489.
65. 65 Faust, K., Raes, J., CoNet app: inference of biological association networks using Cytoscape. F1000Research, 5, 2016, 1519.
66. 66 Faust, K., et al. Cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks. Syst. Microbiol., 6, 2015, 1200.
67. 67 Ban, Y., et al. Investigating microbial co-occurrence patterns based on metagenomic compositional data. Bioinformatics 31 (2015), 3322–3329.
68. 68 Fang, H., et al. CCLasso: correlation inference for compositional data through Lasso. Bioinformatics 31 (2015), 3172–3180.
69. 69 Deng, Y., et al. Molecular ecological network analyses. BMC Bioinformatics, 13, 2012, 113.
70. 70 Biswas, S., et al. Learning microbial interaction networks from metagenomic count data. Przytycka, T.M., (eds.) Research in Computational Molecular Biology, 2015, Springer, 32–43.
71. 71 Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.J., Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 (2002), 7821–7826.
72. 72 Pons, P., Latapy, M., Computing communities in large networks using random walks. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005, 284–293.
73. 73 Blondel, V.D., et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp., 2008, 2008, P10008.
74. 74 Van Dongen, S., Graph clustering via a discrete uncoupling process. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 30 (2008), 121–141.
75. 75 Hua, Z., et al. Epigenomic programming contributes to the genomic drift evolution of the F-Box protein superfamily in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 (2013), 16927–16932.
76. 76 Richards, V.P., et al. Phylogenomics and the dynamic genome evolution of the genus Streptococcus. Genome Biol. Evol. 6 (2014), 741–753.
77. 77 Lei, X., et al. Protein complex identification through Markov clustering with firefly algorithm on dynamic protein–protein interaction networks. Inf. Sci. 329 (2016), 303–316.
78. 78 Wang, J., et al. Construction and application of dynamic protein interaction network based on time course gene expression data. PROTEOMICS 13 (2013), 301–312.