Task-Specific Somatosensory Feedback via Cortical Stimulation in Humans

IEEE Transactions on Haptics

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 515-522

  Cronin, Jeneva A ^a   Wu, Jing ^a   Collins, Kelly L ^b   Sarma, Devapratim ^a   Rao, Rajesh P N ^c   Ojemann, Jeffrey G ^b   Olson, Jared D ^b  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

Haptics in neuroscience; human computer interaction; perception and psychophysics; prosthetics; rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEEDBACK; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); PATIENT REHABILITATION; PROSTHETICS; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

CORTICAL STIMULATION; CORTICAL SURFACES; HAPTICS; HUMAN SENSORIMOTOR; POTENTIAL METHODS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SOMATOSENSORY FEEDBACKS; SURFACE STIMULATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

ADULT; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTROCORTICOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HAND; HUMAN; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

ADULT; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROCORTICOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HAND; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

EID: 85007415277     PISSN: 19391412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TOH.2016.2591952     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. A.-S. Augurelle, "Importance of cutaneous feedback in maintaining a secure grip during manipulation of hand-held objects, " J. Neurophysiol., vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 665-671, Feb. 2002.
2. R. L. Sainburg, H. Poizner, and C. Ghez, "Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination, " J. Neurophysiol., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 2136-2147, Nov. 1993.
3. E. Biddiss, D. Beaton, and T. Chau, "Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics, " Disability Rehabil. Assist. Technol., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 346-357, Jan. 2007.
4. R. P. N. Rao, Brain-Computer Interfacing: An Introduction, 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013.
5. J. R. Wolpaw and E. W. Wolpaw, Brain-Computer Interfaces Principles and Practice. London, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012.
6. T. Pistohl, D. Joshi, G. Ganesh, A. Jackson, and K. Nazarpour, "Artificial proprioceptive feedback for myoelectric control, " IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 498-507, May 2015.
7. A. J. Suminski, D. C. Tkach, A. H. Fagg, and N. G. Hatsopoulos, "Incorporating feedback from multiple sensory modalities enhances brain-machine interface control, " J. Neurosci., vol. 30, no. 50, pp. 16777-16787, Dec. 2010.
8. C. Klaes, Y. Shi, S. Kellis, J. Minxha, B. Revechkis, and R. A. Andersen, "A cognitive neuroprosthetic that uses cortical stimulation for somatosensory feedback, " J. Neural Eng., vol. 11, no. 5, 2014, Art. no. 056024.
9. J. A. Berg, et al., "Behavioral demonstration of a somatosensory neuroprosthesis, " IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 500-507, May 2013.
10. J. E. O'Doherty, et al., "Active tactile exploration using a brainmachine- brain interface, " Nature, vol. 479, no. 7372, pp. 228-31, 2011.
11. S. J. Bensmaia and L. E. Miller, "Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: Progress and looming challenges, " Nat. Rev. Neurosci., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 313-325, May 2014.
12. D. W. Tan, M. A. Schiefer, M. W. Keith, J. R. Anderson, J. Tyler, and D. J. Tyler, "A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception, " Sci. Transl. Med., vol. 6, no. 257, pp. 257ra138-257ra138, Oct. 2014.
13. S. Raspopovic, et al., "Restoring natural sensory feedback in realtime bidirectional hand prostheses, " Sci. Transl. Med., vol. 6, no. 222, pp. 222ra19-222ra19, Feb. 2014.
14. G. S. Dhillon and K. W. Horch, "Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm, " IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 468-472, Dec. 2005.
15. T. A. Kuiken, P. D. Marasco, B. A. Lock, R. N. Harden, and J. P. A. Dewald, "Redirection of cutaneous sensation from the hand to the chest skin of human amputees with targeted reinnervation, " in Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 104, no. 50, Dec. 2007, pp. 20061-20066.
16. S. Kim, T. Callier, G. A. Tabot, R. A. Gaunt, F. V. Tenore, and S. J. Bensmaia, "Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex, " in Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 112, no. 49, Dec. 2015, pp. 15202-15207.
17. L. A. Johnson, J. D. Wander, D. Sarma, D. K. Su, E. E. Fetz, and J. G. Ojemann, "Direct electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex in humans using electrocorticography electrodes: A qualitative and quantitative report, " J. Neural Eng., vol. 10, no. 3, Jun. 2013, Art. no. 036021.
18. E. C. Leuthardt, K. J. Miller, G. Schalk, R. P. N. Rao, and J. G. Ojemann, "Electrocorticography-based brain computer interface- the seattle experience, " IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 194-198, Jun. 2006.
19. J. D. Wander, et al., "Distributed cortical adaptation during learning of a brain-computer interface task, " in Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 110, no. 26, Jun. 2013, pp. 10818-10823.
20. N. Kapadia, V. Zivanovic, M. Verrier, and M. Popovic, "Toronto rehabilitation institute-hand function test: Assessment of gross motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury, " Top. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 167-186, 2012.
21. N. Weisz, et al., "Prestimulus oscillatory power and connectivity patterns predispose conscious somatosensory perception, " in Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 111, no. 4, 2014, pp. E417-E425.
22. U. Berglund and B. Berglund, "Adaptation and recovery in vibrotactile perception, " Perceptual Mot. Skills, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 843-853, Jun. 1970.
23. V. Tannan, S. Simons, R. G. Dennis, and M. Tommerdahl, "Effects of adaptation on the capacity to differentiate simultaneously delivered dual-site vibrotactile stimuli, " Brain Res., vol. 1186, no. 1, pp. 164-170, Dec. 2007.
24. A. K. Goble and M. Hollins, "Vibrotactile adaptation enhances amplitude discrimination, " J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 771-780, Jan. 1993.
25. W. A. Munson, "Standardizing auditory tests, " J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 22, no. 5, Jun. 1950, Art. no. 675.
26. G. T. Fechner, Elements of Psychophysics. New York, NY, USA: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.
27. J. A. Swets and D. M. Green, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1966.
28. M. Jogan and A. A. Stocker, "A new two-alternative forced choice method for the unbiased characterization of perceptual bias and discriminability, " J. Vis., vol. 14, no. 3:20, pp. 1-18, Mar. 2014.
29. S. Dosen, M.-C. Schaeffer, and D. Farina, "Time-division multiplexing for myoelectric closed-loop control using electrotactile feedback, " J. NeuroEngineering Rehabil., vol. 11, no. 1, 2014, Art. no. 138.
30. M. C. Dadarlat, J. E. O'Doherty, and P. N. Sabes, "A learningbased approach to artificial sensory feedback leads to optimal integration, " Nat. Neurosci., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 138-144, Nov. 2014.
31. G. A. Tabot, et al., "Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface, " in Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 110, no. 45, 2013, pp. 18279-84.
32. L. E. Miller and D. J. Weber, "Brain training: Cortical plasticity and afferent feedback in brain-machine interface systems, " IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 465-467, Oct. 2011.