Erratum: Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2013) 110 (18279-18284) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1221113110);Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 45, 2013, Pages 18279-18284

  Tabot, Gregg A ^a   Dammann, John F ^b   Berg, Joshua A ^b   Tenore, Francesco V ^c   Boback, Jessica L ^b   Vogelstein, R Jacob ^c   Bensmaia, Sliman J ^a,b  

^a Committee on Computational Neuroscience ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain computer interface; Brain machine interface; Macaque

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; FINGER; HAND PROSTHESIS; MALE; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; MICROELECTRODE; NEUROPROSTHESIS; NONHUMAN; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRESSURE; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHESUS MONKEY; SENSORY FEEDBACK; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TOUCH;

ANIMALIA; PRIMATES;

EID: 84887316223     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323512111     Document Type: Erratum

References (38)

1. Richer F, Martinez M, Robert M, Bouvier G, Saint-Hilaire JM (1993) Stimulation of human somatosensory cortex: Tactile and body displacement perceptions in medial regions. Exp Brain Res 93(1):173-176.
2. Romo R, Hernández A, Zainos A, Salinas E (1998) Somatosensory discrimination based on cortical microstimulation. Nature 392(6674):387-390.
3. Romo R, Hernández A, Zainos A, Brody CD, Lemus L (2000) Sensing without touching: Psychophysical performance based on cortical microstimulation. Neuron 26(1):273-278.
4. Butovas S, Schwarz C (2007) Detection psychophysics of intracortical microstimulation in rat primary somatosensory cortex. Eur J Neurosci 25(7):2161-2169.
5. London BM, Jordan LR, Jackson CR, Miller LE (2008) Electrical stimulation of the proprioceptive cortex (area 3a) used to instruct a behaving monkey. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 16(1):32-36.
6. O'Doherty JE, Lebedev MA, Hanson TL, Fitzsimmons NA, Nicolelis MA (2009) A brainmachine interface instructed by direct intracortical microstimulation. Front Integr Neurosci 3(20):1-10.
7. O'Doherty JE, et al. (2011) Active tactile exploration using a brain-machine-brain interface. Nature 479(7372):228-231.
8. Schiller PH, Slocum WM, Kwak MC, Kendall GL, Tehovnik EJ (2011) New methods devised specify the size and color of the spots monkeys see when striate cortex (area V1) is electrically stimulated. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(43):17809-17814.
9. Johansson RS, Flanagan JR (2009) Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci 10(5):345-359.
10. Rasmussen T, Penfield W (1947) The human sensorimotor cortex as studied by electrical stimulation. Fed Proc 6(1 Pt 2):184.
11. Simons SB, et al. (2005) Amplitude-dependency of response of SI cortex to flutter stimulation. BMC Neurosci 6:43.
12. Tehovnik EJ, Tolias AS, Sultan F, Slocum WM, Logothetis NK (2006) Direct and indirect activation of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation. J Neurophysiol 96(2): 512-521.
13. Pei YC, Denchev PV, Hsiao SS, Craig JC, Bensmaia SJ (2009) Convergence of submodality- specific input onto neurons in primary somatosensory cortex. J Neurophysiol 102(3):1843-1853.
14. Bensmaia SJ, Denchev PV, Dammann JF,3rd, Craig JC, Hsiao SS (2008) The representation of stimulus orientation in the early stages of somatosensory processing. J Neurosci 28(3):776-786.
15. Tehovnik EJ, Slocum WM, Carvey CE, Schiller PH (2005) Phosphene induction and the generation of saccadic eye movements by striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 93(1):1-19.
16. Bradley DC, et al. (2005) Visuotopic mapping through a multichannel stimulating implant in primate V1. J Neurophysiol 93(3):1659-1670.
17. Berg JA, et al. (2012) Behavioral demonstration of a somatosensory prosthesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 21(3):500-507.
18. Sripati AP, Vogelstein RJ, Armiger RS, Russell AF, Bensmaia SJ; Sung Soo Kim (2009) Conveying tactile feedback in sensorized hand neuroprostheses using a biofidelic model of mechanotransduction. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 3(6):398-404.
19. Ochoa J, Torebjörk E (1983) Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand. J Physiol 342:633-654.
20. Wheat HE, Goodwin AW, Browning AS (1995) Tactile resolution: Peripheral neural mechanisms underlying the human capacity to determine positions of objects contacting the fingerpad. J Neurosci 15(8):5582-5595.
21. Knibestöl M (1973) Stimulus-response functions of rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors in human glabrous skin area. J Physiol 232(3):427-452.
22. Knibestöl M (1975) Stimulus-response functions of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the human glabrous skin area. J Physiol 245(1):63-80.
23. Macefield VG, Hager-Ross C, Johansson RS (1996) Control of grip force during restraint of an object held between finger and thumb: Responses of cutaneous afferents from the digits. Exp Brain Res 108(1):155-171.
24. Goodwin AW, Wheat HE (2004) Sensory signals in neural populations underlying tactile perception and manipulation. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:53-77.
25. Muniak MA, Ray S, Hsiao SS, Dammann JF, Bensmaia SJ (2007) The neural coding of stimulus intensity: Linking the population response of mechanoreceptive afferents with psychophysical behavior. J Neurosci 27(43):11687-11699.
26. Johansson RS, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56(3):550-564.
27. Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391(6669):756.
28. Armel KC, Ramachandran VS (2003) Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proc Biol Sci 270(1523):1499-1506.
29. Marasco PD, Kim K, Colgate JE, Peshkin MA, Kuiken TA (2011) Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees. Brain 134(Pt 3):747-758.
30. Blabe C, et al. (2012) Assessing brain-machine interface priorities from the perspective of spinal cord injury participants. Society for Neuroscience. Soc Neurosci, in press.
31. Histed MH, Bonin V, Reid RC (2009) Direct activation of sparse, distributed populations of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation. Neuron 63(4):508-522.
32. Bak M, et al. (1990) Visual sensations produced by intracortical microstimulation of the human occipital cortex. Med Biol Eng Comput 28(3):257-259.
33. Schmidt EM, et al. (1996) Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. Brain 119(Pt 2):507-522.
34. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W (1998) The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain 121(Pt 9):1603-1630.
35. Johannes MS, et al. (2011) An overview of the developmental process for the Modular Prosthetic Limb. The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Technical Digest 30(3):207-216.
36. Pei YC, Hsiao SS, Craig JC, Bensmaia SJ (2010) Shape invariant coding of motion direction in somatosensory cortex. PLoS Biol 8(2):e1000305.
37. Pons TP, Garraghty PE, Cusick CG, Kaas JH (1985) A sequential representation of the occiput, arm, forearm and hand across the rostrocaudal dimension of areas 1, 2 and 5 in macaque monkeys. Brain Res 335(2):350-353.
38. Koivuniemi AS, Otto KJ (2011) Asymmetric versus symmetric pulses for cortical microstimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19(5):468-476.