Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 346-357

  Biddiss, Elaine ^a,b   Beaton, Dorcas ^c   Chau, Tom ^a,b  

^a University of Toronto   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c INSTITUTE FOR WORK AND HEALTH   (Canada)

Author keywords

limb prosthesis; prosthesis design; prosthesis fitting; rehabilitation; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CHILD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; CHILD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; UPPER EXTREMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60249100489     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17483100701714733     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Draper M, Cohen P, Buchan H. Seeking consumer views in: What use are results of hospital patient satisfaction surveys? Int J Qual Health Care 2001;13:463-468.
2. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Storey L, et al. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: Implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Tech Assess [serial online] 2002;6(32). Available: 26 March 2007.
3. Judge S. Family-centered assistive technology assessment and intervention practices for early intervention. Infants Young Children 2002;15:60-68.
4. Mulholland SJ, Packer TL, Laschinger SJ, Lysack JT, Wyss UP, Balaram S. Evaluating a new mobility device: Feedback from women with disabilities in India. Disabil Rehab 2000;22:111-122.
5. Kyberd P, Davey J, Morrison J. A survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Oxfordshire. J Prosthet Orthot [serial online] 1998;10(4). Accessed 5 November 2005 from the website: http://www.oandp.org/jpo/library/1998-04-085.asp
6. Atkins D, Heard D, Donovan W. Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities. J Prosthet Orthot 1996;9:2-11.
7. Datta D, Selvarajah K, Davey N. Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency-acquired and congenital. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:172-177.
8. Davidson J. A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities. J Hand Ther 2002;15:62-70.
9. Fraser CM. An evaluation of the use made of cosmetic and functional prostheses by unilateral upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1998;22:216-223.
10. Gaine WJ, Smart C, Bransby-Zachary M. Upper limb traumatic amputees. Review of prosthetic use. J Hand Surg (Br) 1997;22:73-76.
11. Heger H, Millstein S, Hunter GA. Electrically powered prostheses for the adult with an upper limb amputation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1985;67:278-281.
12. Silcox DH 3rd, Rooks MD, Vogel RR, Fleming LL. Myoelectric prostheses. A long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1993;75:1781-1789.
13. Kejlaa GH. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993;17:157-163.
14. Pons JL, Ceres R, Rocon E, Reynaerts D, Saro B, Levin S, et al. Objectives and technological approach to the development of the multifunctional MANUS upper limb prosthesis. Robotica 2005;23:301-310.
15. Routhier F, Vincent C, Morissette MJ, Desaulniers L. Clinical results of an investigation of paediatric upper limb myoelectric prosthesis fitting at the Quebec Rehabilitation Institute. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001;25:119-131.
16. Crandall RC, Tomhave W. Pediatric unilateral below-elbow amputees: Retrospective analysis of 34 patients given multiple prosthetic options. J Pediatr Orthop 2002;22:380-383.
17. Ballance R, Wilson BN, Harder JA. Factors affecting myoelectric prosthetic use and wearing patterns in the juvenile unilateral below-elbow amputee. Can J Occup Ther 1989; 56:132-137.
18. Berke GM, Nielsen CC. Establishing parameters affecting the use of myoelectric prostheses in children: A preliminary investigation. J Prosthet Orthot [serial online] 1991;3(4). Accessed 5 November 2005 from the website: http://www.oandp.org/jpo/library/1991-04-162.asp
19. Glynn MK, Galway HR, Hunter G, Sauter WF. Management of the upper-limb-deficient child with a powered prosthetic device. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;209:202-205.
20. Hubbard S, Kurtz I, Heim W, Montgomery G. Powered prosthetic intervention. In: Herring J, Birch J, editors. The limb deficient child. Rosemont, Illinois: American Academy of Orthopardic Surgeons; 1997. pp 417-431.
21. Kruger LM, Fishman S. Myoelectric and body-powered prostheses. J Pediatr Orthop 1993;13:68-75.
22. Postema K, van der Donk V, van Limbeek J, Rijken RA, Poelma MJ. Prosthesis rejection in children with a unilateral congenital arm defect. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:243-249.
23. Bhaskaranand K, Bhat AK, Acharya KN. Prosthetic rehabilitation in traumatic upper limb amputees (an Indian perspective). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003;123:363-366.
24. Burger H, Marincek C. Upper limb prosthetic use in Slovenia. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994;18:25-33.
25. Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, Zelig G, Heim M. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:60-63.
26. Fernandez-Palazzi F, de Gutierrez DP, Paladino R. The care of the limb deficient child in Venezuela. Prosthet Orthot Int 1991;15:156-159.
27. Biddiss E, Chau T. Upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int (in press).
28. Lake C, Miguelez J. Comparative analysis of microprocessors in upper limb prosthetics. J Prosthet Orthot [serial online] 2003;15(2). Accessed 5 November 2005 from the website: http://www.oandp.org/jop/library/2003-02-048.asp
29. Hartford K, Carey R, Mendonca J. Sampling bias in an international internet survey of diversion programs in the criminal justice system. Eval Health Prof 2007;30:35-46.
30. Datta D, Kingston J, Ronald J. Myoelectric prostheses for below-elbow amputees: The Trent experience. Int Disabil Stud 1989;11:167-170.
31. van Lunteren A, van Lunteren-Gerritsen GH, Stassen HG, Zuithoff MJ. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1983;7:141-151.
32. Carrozza MC, Suppo C, Sebastiani F, Massa B, Vecchi F, Lazzarini R, et al. The SPRING Hand: Development of a selfadaptive prosthesis for restoring natural grasping. Autonomous Robots 2004;16:125-141.
33. Kyberd PJ, Light C, Chappell PH, Nightingale JM, Whatley D, Evans M. The design of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: A study of the Southampton Hand. Robotica 2001;19:593-600.
34. Pylatiuk C, Schulz S, Kargov A, Bretthauer G. Two multiarticulated hydraulic hand prostheses. Artificial Organs 2004; 28:980-986.
35. Ajiboye AB, Weir RF. A heuristic fuzzy logic approach to EMG pattern recognition for multifunctional prosthesis control. IEEE Trans Neur Sys Rehabil Eng 2005;13:280-291.
36. Huang YH, Englehart KB, Hudgins B, Chan ADC. A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005;52:1801-1811.
37. Carpaneto J, Micera S, Zaccone F, Vecchi F, Dario P. A sensorized thumb for force closed-loop control of hand neuroprostheses. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003;11:346-353.
38. Cranny A, Cotton DPJ, Chappell PH, Beeby SP, White NM. Thick-film force and slip sensors for a prosthetic hand. Sens Actuators A 2005;123:162-171.
39. Riso RR. Strategies for providing upper extremity amputees with tactile and hand position feedback-moving closer to the bionic arm. Technol Health Care 1999;7:401-409.
40. Zecca M, Cappiello G, Sebastiani F, Roccella S, Vecchi F, Carrozza MC, et al. Experimental analysis of the proprioceptive and exteroceptive sensors of an underactuated prosthetic hand. Lect Notes Contr Inf 2004;306:233-242.
41. Dhillon GS, Horch KW. Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005;13:468-472.
42. Ayantunde AA, Welch NT, Parsons SL. A survey of patient satisfaction and use of the internet for health information. Int J Clin Pract 2007;61:458-462.
43. Legters K, Barber Verbus N, Kitchen S, Tomecsko J, Urban N. Fear of falling, balance confidence and healthrelated quality of life in individuals with postpolio syndrome. Physio Theory Pract 2006;22:127-135.
44. Ritter P, Lorig K, Laurent D, Matthew K. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: A randomized comparison. J Med Internet Res 2004;6:e29.
45. Murray CD, Fox J. Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower limb amputee. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:925-931.
46. Murray CD. The social meanings of prosthesis use. J Health Psych 2005;10:425-441.
47. Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Bock BC, Cobb NK, Baskin-Sommers A, Niaura R, et al. Internet-vs. telephoneadministered questionnaires in a randomized trial of smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res 2006;8:S49-57.
48. Canadian Internet Use Survey [Internet]. Statistics Canada; Available from the website: http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/060815/d060815b.htm
49. Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003 [Internet]. US Census Bureau; Available from the website: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/ p23-208.pdf
50. Ono H, Zavodny M. Gender and the internet. Soc Sci Quart 2003;84:111-121.