Searching molecular structure databases using tandem MS data: are we there yet?

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Volumn 36, Issue , 2017, Pages 1-6

  Böcker, Sebastian ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; DRUG CONFORMATION; LIBRARY; METABOLITE; METABOLOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; CHEMICAL DATABASE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; SOFTWARE;

DATABASES, CHEMICAL; METABOLOMICS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; SOFTWARE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 85007174166     PISSN: 13675931     EISSN: 18790402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.12.010     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. 1 Eng, J.K., McCormack, A.L., Yates, J.R. III, An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 5 (1994), 976–989.
2. 2 Steen, H., Mann, M., The ABC's (and XYZ's) of peptide sequencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5 (2004), 699–711.
3. 3 Milman, B.L., Zhurkovich, I.K., Mass spectral libraries: a statistical review of the visible use. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 80 (2016), 636–640.
4. 4 Vinaixa, M., Schymanski, E.L., Neumann, S., Navarro, M., Salek, R.M., Yanes, O., Mass spectral databases for LC/MS- and GC/MS-based metabolomics: state of the field and future prospects. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 78 (2016), 23–35.
5. 5 Stein, S.E., Mass spectral reference libraries: an ever-expanding resource for chemical identification. Anal Chem 84 (2012), 7274–7282.
6. 6 Kim, S., Thiessen, P.A., Bolton, E.E., Chen, J., Fu, G., Gindulyte, A., Han, L., He, J., He, S., Shoemaker, B.A., Wang, J., Yu, B., Zhang, J., Bryant, S.H., PubChem substance and compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res 44 (2016), D1202–D1213.
7. 7 Pence, H.E., Williams, A., ChemSpider: an online chemical information resource. J Chem Educ 87 (2010), 1123–1124.
8. 8 Wishart, D.S., Jewison, T., Guo, A.C., Wilson, M., Knox, C., Liu, Y., Djoumbou, Y., Mandal, R., Aziat, F., Dong, E., Bouatra, S., Sinelnikov, I., Arndt, D., Xia, J., Liu, P., Yallou, F., Bjorndahl, T., Perez-Pineiro, R., Eisner, R., Allen, F., Neveu, V., Greiner, R., Scalbert, A., HMDB 3.0: the human metabolome database in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 41:Database issue (2013), D801–D807.
9. 9 Hastings, J., de Matos, P., Dekker, A., Ennis, M., Harsha, B., Kale, N., Muthukrishnan, V., Owen, G., Turner, S., Williams, M., Steinbeck, C., The ChEBI reference database and ontology for biologically relevant chemistry: enhancements for 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 41:Database issue (2013), D456–D463.
10. 10 Gómez-Bombarelli, R., Duvenaud, D., Miguel Hernández-Lobato, J., Aguilera-Iparraguirre, J., Hirzel, T.D., Adams, R.P., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules. 2016 arXiv:1610.02415.
11. 11• Jeffryes, J.G., Colastani, R.L., Elbadawi-Sidhu, M., Kind, T., Niehaus, T.D., Broadbelt, L.J., Hanson, A.D., Fiehn, O., Tyo, K.E.J., Henry, C.S., MINEs: open access databases of computationally predicted enzyme promiscuity products for untargeted metabolomics. J Cheminform, 7, 2015, 44 Combinatorial prediction of hypothetical metabolites from promiscuous enzyme reactions, using the Biochemical Network Integrated Network Explorer (BNICE) method.
12. 12 Kerber, A., Laue, R., Meringer, M., Rücker, C., Schymanski, E., Mathematical Chemistry and Chemoinformatics: Structure Generation, Elucidation and Quantitative Structure–Property Relationships. 2013, De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston.
13. 13 Matsuda, F., Technical challenges in mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Mass Spectrom, 5, 2016 S0052–S0052.
14. 14• Hill, D.W., Kertesz, T.M., Fontaine, D., Friedman, R., Grant, D.F., Mass spectral metabonomics beyond elemental formula: chemical database querying by matching experimental with computational fragmentation spectra. Anal Chem 80 (2008), 5574–5582 Introduced the idea of searching in a molecular structure database using tandem MS data.
15. 15 Cautereels, J., Claeys, M., Geldof, D., Blockhuys, F., Quantum chemical mass spectrometry: ab initio prediction of electron ionization mass spectra and identification of new fragmentation pathways. J Mass Spectrom 51 (2016), 602–614.
16. 16•• Bauer, C.A., Grimme, S., How to compute electron ionization mass spectra from first principles. J Phys Chem A 120 (2016), 3755–3766 Introduces QCEIMS to predict an electron ionization fragmentation spectrum, given the structure of the compound. Uses Quantum Chemistry and Born–Oppenheimer Molecular Dynamics.
17. 17• Grimme, S., Towards first principles calculation of electron impact mass spectra of molecules. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 52 (2013), 6306–6312 Precursor paper for QCEIMS, introduces the methodic basis.
18. 18• Allen, F., Pon, A., Greiner, R., Wishart, D., Computational prediction of electron ionization mass spectra to assist in GC/MS compound identification. Anal Chem 88 (2016), 7689–7697 CFM-ID is adapted and trained to process GC–MS data, and is therefore one of the few tools that can handle both LC–MS and GC–MS data.
19. 19•• Allen, F., Greiner, R., Wishart, D., Competitive fragmentation modeling of ESI-MS/MS spectra for putative metabolite identification. Metabolomics 11 (2015), 98–110 Introduces CFM-ID that predicts a tandem mass spectrum, given the structure of the compound. Uses machine learning and computational statistics.
20. 20 Allen, F., Wilson, M., Pon, A., Greiner, R., Wishart, D., CFM-ID: a web server for annotation, spectrum prediction and metabolite identification from tandem mass spectra. Nucleic Acids Res 42 (2014), W94–W99.
21. 21•• Tsugawa, H., Kind, T., Nakabayashi, R., Yukihira, D., Tanaka, W., Cajka, T., Saito, K., Fiehn, O., Arita, M., Hydrogen rearrangement rules: computational MS/MS fragmentation and structure elucidation using MS-FINDER software. Anal Chem 88 (2016), 7946–7958 Introduces MS-FINDER based on combinatorial fragmentation.
22. 22• Verdegem, D., Lambrechts, D., Carmeliet, P., Ghesquière, B., Improved metabolite identification with MIDAS and MAGMa through MS/MS spectral dataset-driven parameter optimization. Metabolomics 12 (2016), 1–16 Introduces MAGMa+ that uses machine learning to estimate MAGMa parameters.
23. 23• Ruttkies, C., Schymanski, E.L., Wolf, S., Hollender, J., Neumann, S., MetFrag relaunched: incorporating strategies beyond in silico fragmentation. J Cheminform, 8, 2016, 3 Latest version of MetFrag.
24. 24 Wang, Y., Kora, G., Bowen, B.P., Pan, C., MIDAS: a database-searching algorithm for metabolite identification in metabolomics. Anal Chem 86 (2014), 9496–9503.
25. 25 Ridder, L., van der Hooft, J.J.J., Verhoeven, S., de Vos, R.C.H., Bino, R.J., Vervoort, J., Automatic chemical structure annotation of an LC–MS(n) based metabolic profile from green tea. Anal Chem 85 (2013), 6033–6040.
26. n spectral trees. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 26 (2012), 2461–2471 Introduces MAGMa based on combinatorial fragmentation.
27. 27•• Wolf, S., Schmidt, S., Müller-Hannemann, M., Neumann, S., In silico fragmentation for computer assisted identification of metabolite mass spectra. BMC Bioinform, 11, 2010, 148 Introduces MetFrag based on combinatorial fragmentation, the first practical tool for searching with MS data in a structure database.
28. 28• Brouard, C., Shen, H., Dührkop, K., d'Alché-Buc, F., Böcker, S., Rousu, J., Fast metabolite identification with input output kernel regression. Bioinformatics 32 (2016), i28–i36 CSI:FingerID is given a new machine learning fundament, namely Input Output Kernel Regression.
29. 29•• Dührkop, K., Shen, H., Meusel, M., Rousu, J., Böcker, S., Searching molecular structure databases with tandem mass spectra using CSI:FingerID. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112 (2015), 12580–12585 Introduces CSI:FingerID that predicts the molecular fingerprint of an unknown compound, given its tandem mass spectrum. Uses fragmentation trees and machine learning.
30. 30• Shen, H., Dührkop, K., Böcker, S., Rousu, J., Metabolite identification through multiple kernel learning on fragmentation trees. Bioinformatics 30 (2014), i157–i164 Precursor paper for CSI:FingerID, introduces the methodic basis.
31. 31• Heinonen, M., Shen, H., Zamboni, N., Rousu, J., Metabolite identification and molecular fingerprint prediction via machine learning. Bioinformatics 28 (2012), 2333–2341 Introduces FingerID that predicts the molecular fingerprint of an unknown compound; precursor method of CSI:Finger.
32. 32 Schymanski, E.L., Gallampois, C.M.J., Krauss, M., Meringer, M., Neumann, S., Schulze, T., Wolf, S., Brack, W., Consensus structure elucidation combining GC/EI-MS, structure generation and calculated properties. Anal Chem 84 (2012), 3287–3295.
33. 33• Hufsky, F., Böcker, S., Mining molecular structure databases: identification of small molecules based on fragmentation mass spectrometry data. Mass Spectrom Rev, 2016, 10.1002/mas.21489 Epub ahead of print Review covering: candidate molecular structure generation, competitive fragmentation modeling, molecular fingerprint prediction, methods evaluation.
34. 34• Hufsky, F., Scheubert, K., Böcker, S., Computational mass spectrometry for small molecule fragmentation. Trends Anal Chem 53 (2014), 41–48 Review covering: Searching in spectral libraries, rule-based prediction, combinatorial fragmentation, predicting substructures and compound classes, fragmentation trees.
35. 35• Hufsky, F., Scheubert, K., Böcker, S., New kids on the block: novel informatics methods for natural product discovery. Nat Prod Rep 31 (2014), 807–817 Review covering: merging combinatorial fragmentation and library search by MetFusion, predicting fragmentation spectra by ISIS, fingerprint prediction by FingerID, comparing fragmentation trees by FT-BLAST.
36. 36 Milton, J., Tramp: The Life of Charlie Chaplin. 1998, Da Capo Press.
37. 37• Gatto, L., Hansen, K.D., Hoopmann, M.R., Hermjakob, H., Kohlbacher, O., Beyer, A., Testing and validation of computational methods for mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 15 (2016), 809–814 Some fundamentals of computational methods evaluation.
38. 38 Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C.J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T., Hassabis, D., Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529 (2016), 484–489.
39. 39 Little, J.L., Williams, A.J., Pshenichnov, A., Tkachenko, V., Identification of “known unknowns” utilizing accurate mass data and ChemSpider. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 23 (2012), 179–185.
40. 40 Li, Y.F., Arnold, R.J., Radivojac, P., Tang, H., Protein identification problem from a Bayesian point of view. Stat Interface 5 (2012), 21–37.
41. 41 Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W., Lipman, D.J., Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215 (1990), 403–410.
42. 42 Allard, P.-M., Péresse, T., Bisson, J., Gindro, K., Marcourt, L., Pham, V.C., Roussi, F., Litaudon, M., Wolfender, J.-L., Integration of molecular networking and in-silico MS/MS fragmentation for natural products dereplication. Anal Chem 88 (2016), 3317–3323.
43. 43 Schymanski, E.L., Jeon, J., Gulde, R., Fenner, K., Ruff, M., Singer, H.P., Hollender, J., Identifying small molecules via high resolution mass spectrometry: communicating confidence. Environ Sci Technol 48 (2014), 2097–2098.
44. 44 Sumner, L.W., Lei, Z., Nikolau, B.J., Saito, K., Roessner, U., Trengove, R., Proposed quantitative and alphanumeric metabolite identification metrics. Metabolomics 10 (2014), 1047–1049.
45. 45 Creek, D.J., Dunn, W.B., Fiehn, O., Griffin, J.L., Hall, R.D., Zhentian, L., Mistrik, R., Neumann, S., Schymanski, E.L., Sumner, L.W., Trengove, R., Wolfender, J.-L., Metabolite identification: are you sure? and how do your peers gauge your confidence?. Metabolomics 10 (2014), 350–353.
46. 46 Nesvizhskii, A.I., Vitek, O., Aebersold, R., Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 4 (2007), 787–797.
47. 47 Creek, D.J., Jankevics, A., Breitling, R., Watson, D.G., Barrett, M.P., Burgess, K.E.V., Toward global metabolomics analysis with hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry: improved metabolite identification by retention time prediction. Anal Chem 83 (2011), 8703–8710.
48. 48 Stanstrup, J., Neumann, S., Vrhovšek, U., PredRet: prediction of retention time by direct mapping between multiple chromatographic systems. Anal Chem 87 (2015), 9421–9428.