The impact of multiple immersion levels on data quality and panelist engagement for the evaluation of cookies under a preparation-based scenario

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 57, Issue , 2017, Pages 114-125

  Hathaway, Drew ^a   Simons, Christopher T ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer testing; Cookies; Immersive technology; Preparation scenario

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007143612     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bangcuyo, R.G., Smith, K.J., Zumach, J.L., Pierce, A.M., Guttman, G.A., Simons, C.T., The use of immersive technologies to improve consumer testing: The role of ecological validity, context and engagement in evaluating coffee. Food Quality and Preference 41 (2015), 84–95.
2. Bell, R., Meiselman, H.L., Pierson, B.J., Reeve, W.G., Effects of adding an Italian theme to a restaurant on the perceived ethnicity, acceptability, and selection of foods. Appetite 22 (1994), 11–24.
3. Costa, A.I., Jongen, W.M., New insights into consumer-led food product development. Trends in Food Science & Technology 17 (2006), 457–465.
4. Dalenberg, J.R., Nanetti, L., Renken, R.J., de Wijk, R.A., ter Horst, G.J., Dealing with consumer differences in liking during repeated exposure to food; typical dynamics in rating behavior. PLoS One, 9(3), 2014, e93350, 10.1371/journal.pone.0093350.
5. De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., Baeyens, F., Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin 127:6 (2001), 853–869.
6. Delarue, J., Boutrolle, I., The effects of context on liking: Implications for hedonic measurements in new product development. Jaeger, S.R., MacFie, H., (eds.) Consumer-driven innovation in food and personal care products, 2010, Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, 175–218.
7. Deliza, R., MacFie, H.J.H., The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 11 (1996), 103–128.
8. Dohle, S., Rall, S., Siegrist, M., Does self-prepared food taste better? Effects of food preparation on liking. Health Psychology 35:5 (2016), 500–508.
9. Ferber, C., Cabanac, M., Influence of noise on gustatory affective ratings and reference for sweet or salt. Appetite 8 (1987), 229–235.
10. Hein, K.A., Hamid, N., Jaeger, S.R., Delahunty, C.M., Application of a written scenario to evoke a consumption context in a laboratory setting: Effects on hedonic ratings. Food Quality and Preference 21 (2010), 410–416.
11. Hein, K.A., Hamid, N., Jaeger, S.R., Delahunty, C.M., Effects of evoked consumption contexts on hedonic ratings: A case study with two fruit beverages. Food Quality and Preference 26 (2012), 35–44.
12. Ischer, M., Baron, N., Mermoud, C., Cayeux, I., Porcherot, C., Sander, D., Delplanque, S., How incorporation of scents could enhance immersive virtual experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 2014, e736.
13. Jaeger, S.R., Fiszman, S., Reis, F., Chheang, S.L., Kam, K., Pineau, B., Ares, G., Influence of evoked contexts on hedonic product discrimination and sensory characterizations using CATA questions. Food Quality and Preference 56 (2017), 138–148.
14. Jaeger, S.R., Meiselman, H.L., Perceptions of meal convenience: The case of at-home evening meals. Appetite 42 (2004), 317–325.
15. Kantono, K., Hamid, N., Shepherd, D., Lin, Y.H.T., Yakuncheva, S., Yoo, M.J., Carr, B.T., The influence of auditory and visual stimuli on the pleasantness of chocolate gelati. Food Quality and Preference 53 (2016), 9–18.
16. Kasof, J., Indoor lighting preferences and bulimic behavior. An individual differences approach. Personality and Individual Differences 32 (2002), 383–400.
17. Kim, S.-E., Lee, S.M., Kim, K.-O., Consumer acceptability of coffee as affected by situational conditions and involvement. Food Quality and Preference 52:1 (2016), 124–132.
18. King, S.C., Weber, A.J., Meiselman, H.L., Lv, N., The effect of meal situation, social interaction, physical environment and choice on food acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 15 (2004), 645–653.
19. Koster, E.P., Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective. Food Quality and Preference 20 (2009), 70–82.
20. Koster, E.P., Couronne, T., Léon, F., Lévy, C., Marcelino, A.S., Repeatability in hedonic sensory measurement: A conceptual exploration. Food Quality and Preference 14:2 (2003), 165–176.
21. Koster, E.P., Mojet, J., Boredom and the reasons why some new food products fail. MacFie, H., (eds.) Consumer-led food product development, 2007, Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, 262–268.
22. Lusk, K.A., Hamid, N., Delahunty, C.M., Jaeger, S.R., Effects of an evoked refreshing consumption context on hedonic responses to apple juice measured using best–worst scaling and the 9-pt hedonic category scale. Food Quality and Preference 43 (2015), 21–25.
23. Lynn, M., McCall, M., Beyond gratitude and gratuity: A meta-analytic review of the predictors of restaurant tipping. 2016 [Electronic version]. Retrieved August 4, 2016, from Cornell University, SHA School site: http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/workingpapers/21.
24. Mead, R., Gay, C., Sequential design of sensory trials. Food Quality and Preference, 6(271–280), 1995, 14.
25. O'Brien, H.L., Toms, E., The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology 61 (2010), 50–69.
26. Petit, C., Siefferman, J.M., Testing consumer preferences for iced-coffee: Does the drinking environment have any influence?. Food Quality and Preference 28 (2007), 23–31.
27. Redmond, W., An ecological perspective on new product failure: The effects of competitive overcrowding. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12 (1995), 200–213.
28. Rosas-Nexticapa, M., Angulo, O., O'Mahony, M., How well does the 9-point hedonic scale predict purchase frequency?. Journal of Sensory Studies 20 (2005), 313–331.
29. Rozin, P., Fallon, A., Mandell, R., Family resemblance in attitudes to foods. Developmental Psychology 20:2 (1984), 309–314.
30. Rozin, P., Tuorila, H., Simultaneous and temporal contextual influences on food acceptance. Food Quality and Preference 4 (1993), 11–20.
31. Sester, C., Deroy, O., Sutan, A., Galia, F., Desmarchelier, J., Valentin, D., Dacremont, C., “Having a drink in a bar”: An immersive approach to explore the effects of context on drink choice. Food Quality and Preference 28 (2013), 23–31.
32. Sommer, R., Steele, J., Social effects on duration in restaurants. Appetite 29 (1997), 25–30.
33. Spence, C., Auditory contributions to flavour perception and feeding behavior. Physiology and Behavior 107 (2012), 505–515.
34. Stroebele, N., De Castro, J.M., Effect of ambience on food intake and food choice. Nutrition 20 (2004), 821–838.
35. Velasco, C., Jones, R., King, S., Spence, C., Assessing the influence of the multisensory environment on the whisky drinking experience. Flavour, 2, 2013, 1.
36. Weiss, B.H., O'Mahony, M., Wichchukit, S., Various paired preference tests: Experimenter effect on “take home” choice. Journal of Sensory Studies 25 (2010), 778–790.
37. Westerterp-Platenga, M.S., Effects of extreme environments on food intake in human subjects. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58 (1999), 791–798.
38. Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J., Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence 7 (1998), 225–240.
39. Yeomans, M.R., Olfactory influences on appetite and satiety in humans. Physiology and Behavior 87 (2006), 800–804.
40. Zellner, D.A., Stewart, W.F., Rozin, P., Brown, J.M., Effects of temperature and expectations on liking for beverages. Physiology and Behavior 44 (1988), 61–68.