Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus plantarum C88 improves adhesion

Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 184-193

  Zhao, Yujuan ^a   Duan, Cuicui ^a   Gao, Lei ^a   Yu, Xue ^a   Niu, Chunhua ^a   Li, Shengyu ^a  

^a JILIN ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Genome shuffling; Lactobacilli; Mutagenesis; Probiotics

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; BACILLI; IRRADIATION; MUTAGENESIS;

ADHESIVE PROPERTIES; GENOME SHUFFLING; LACTOBACILLI; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; PROBIOTICS; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNAS; RECOMBINANT STRAINS; ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATIONS;

GENES;

BILE ACID; PROBIOTIC AGENT;

BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; DNA SHUFFLING; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; METABOLISM; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MUTAGENESIS; PHYSIOLOGY;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; BILE ACIDS AND SALTS; DNA SHUFFLING; GENOME, BACTERIAL; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MUTAGENESIS; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; PROBIOTICS;

EID: 85006415535     PISSN: 09168451     EISSN: 13476947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09168451.2016.1224637     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Luo JM, Li JS, Liu D, et al. Genome shuffling of Streptomyces gilvosporeus for improving natamycin production. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012;60:6026-6036.
2. Yu G, Hu Y, Hui M, et al. Genome shuffling of Streptomyces roseosporus for improving daptomycin production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;172:2661-2669.
3. Chalopagorn P, Charoenpanich J, Choowongkomon K. Genome shuffling enhances lipase production of Thermophilic geobacillus sp. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;174:1444-1454.
4. Zhang G, Lin Y, Qi X, et al. Genome shuffling of the nonconventional yeast Pichia anomala for improved sugar alcohol production. Microbial. Cell Factories. 2015;14:112.
5. Hida H, Yamada T, Yamada Y. Genome shuffling of Streptomyces sp. U121 for improved production of hydroxycitric acid. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007;73:1387-1393.
6. John RP, Gangadharan D, Madhavan NK. Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus debrueckill mutant and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens through protoplasmic fusion for L-lactic acid production from starchy wastes. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:8008-8015.
7. Lee K, Lee HG, Choi YJ. Proteomic analysis of the effect of bile salts on the intestinal and probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri. J. Biotechnol. 2008;137:14-19.
8. Morita H, He F, Fuse T, et al. Adhesion of lactic acid bacteria to caco-2 cells and their effect on cytokine secretion. Microbiol. Immunol. 2002;46:293-297.
9. Leite AM, Miguel MA, Peixoto RS, et al. Probiotic potential of selected lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from Brazilian kefir grains. J. Dairy Sci. 2015;98:3622-3632.
10. Schillinger U, Guigas C, Holzapfel WH. In vitro adherence and other properties of lactobacilli used in probiotic yoghurt-like products. Int. Dairy J. 2005;15:1289-1297.
11. Wang HK, Sun Y, Chen C, et al. Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus plantarum for improving antifungal activity. Food Control. 2013;32:341-347.
12. Del Re B, Sgorbati B, Miglioli M, et al. Adhesion, autoaggregation and hydrophobicity of 13 strains of Bifidobacterium longum. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2000;31:438-442.
13. Zhang L, Liu C, Li D, et al. Antioxidant activity of an exopolysaccharide isolated from Lactobacillus plantarum C88. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013;54:270-275.
14. Lv XA, Jin YY, Li YD, et al. Genome shuffling of Streptomyces viridochromogenes for improved production of avilamycin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;97:641-648.
15. Yeeh Y, Jo YB, Kwon OC. Protoplast fusion between Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Biotechnol. Lett. 1996;18:805-808.
16. Xu H, Jeong HS, Lee HY, et al. Assessment of cell surface properties and adhesion potential of selected probiotic strains. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009;49:434-442.
17. Zhang J, Zhang X, Zhang L, et al. Potential probiotic characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from Inner Mongolia "Hurood" cheese. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;24:225-235.
18. Li DD, Guo CH, Yue L, et al. Expression, regulation and function of Hmgn3 during decidualization in mice. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2015;413:13-25.
19. O'Mahony R, Basset C, Holton J, et al. Comparison of image analysis software packages in the assessment of adhesion of microorganisms to mucosal epithelium using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2005;61:105-126.
20. Johansson ML, Quednau M, Molin G, et al. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for rapid typing of Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1995;21:155-159.
21. Oneca M, Irigoyen A, Ortigosa M, et al. PCR and RAPD identification of L. plantarum strains isolated from ovine milk and cheese. Geographical distribution of strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003;227:271-277.
22. Medici M, Vinderola CG, Perdigón G. Gut mucosal immunomdulation by probiotic fresh cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2004;14: 611-618.
23. Zielińska D, Rzepkowska A, Radawska A, et al. In vitro screening of selected probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from traditional fermented cabbage and cucumber. Curr. Microbiol. 2015;70:183-194.
24. Srikanjana K, Helmut V, Jakkapan S, et al. Probiotic properties of lactobacilli isolated from Thai traditional food. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2008;76:485-503.
25. Kos B, Šušković J, Vuković S, et al. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003;94:981-987.
26. Ren D, Li C, Qin Y, et al. In vitro evaluation of the probiotic and functional potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from fermented food and human intestine. Anaerobe. 2014;30:1-10.
27. Ruiz L, Margolles A, Sánchez B. Bile resistance mechanisms in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Front. Microbiol. 2013; 4:396.
28. Darilmaz DO, Beyatli Y. Acid-bile, antibiotic resistance and inhibitory properties of propionibacteria isolated from Turkish traditional home-made cheeses. Anaerobe. 2012;18:122-127.
29. Ram C, Chander H. Optimization of culture conditions of probiotic bifidobacteria for maximal adhesion to hexadecane. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003;19:407-410.
30. Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S. Role of commercial probiotic strains against human pathogen adhesion to intestinal mucus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007;45:454-460.
31. Gueimonde M, Noriega L, Margolles A, et al. Ability of Bifidobacterium strains with acquired resistance to bile to adhere to human intestinal mucus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005;101: 341-346.
32. Collado MC, Gueimonde M, Hernández M, et al. Adhesion of selected Bifidobacterium strains to human intestinal mucus and the role of adhesion in enteropathogen exclusion. J. Food Protect. 2005;68:2672-2678.
33. Delgado S, Leite AM, Ruas-Madiedo P, et al. Probiotic and technological properties of Lactobacillus spp. strains from the human stomach in the search for potential candidates against gastric microbial dysbiosis. Front. Microbiol. 2015;5:766.
34. Tuomola EM, Salminen S. Adhesion of some probiotic and dairy Lactobacillus strains to Caco-2 cell cultures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998;41:45-51.