Ontologies of linguistic annotation: Survey and perspectives

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 303-310

  Chiarcos, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptual interoperability; Linguistic annotation; Ontologies

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; LINGUISTICS;

CONCEPTUAL INTEROPERABILITY; LINGUISTIC ANNOTATIONS; LINGUISTIC PHENOMENA;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 85004151640     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. G. Aguado de Cea, A. Gomez-Perez, I. Alvarez de Mon, and A. Pareja-Lora. 2004. OntoTag's linguistic ontologies. In Proc. Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC'04), Washington, DC, USA.
2. T. Berners-Lee. 2006. Design issues: Linked data. http://www. w3. org/DesignIssues/ LinkedData. html.
3. S. Brants, S. Dipper, P. Eisenberg, et al. 2004. TIGER: Linguistic interpretation of a German corpus. Research on Language and Computation, 2 (4):597-620.
4. E. Brill and J. Wu. 1998. Classifier combination for improved lexical disambiguation. In Proc. COLING-ACL 1998, pages 191-195, Montréal, Canada, August.
5. A. Burchardt, S. Padó, D. Spohr, et al. 2008. Formalising Multi-layer Corpora in OWL/DL-Lexicon Modelling, Querying and Consistency Control. In Proc. 3rd International Joint Conference on NLP (IJCNLP 2008), Hyderabad, India.
6. E. Buyko, C. Chiarcos, and A. Pareja-Lora. 2008. Ontology-based interface specifications for a NLP pipeline architecture. In Proc. LREC 2008, Marrakech, Morocco.
7. S. Cassidy. 2010. An RDF realisation of LAF in the DADA Annotation Server. In Proc. 5th Joint ISO-ACL/SIGSEM Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation (ISA-5), Hong Kong, January.
8. C. Chiarcos and T. Erjavec. 2011. OWL/DL formalization of the MULTEXT-East morphosyntactic specifications. In Proc. 5th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, held in conjunction with ACL-HTL 2011, pages 11-20, Portland, June.
9. C. Chiarcos and M. Götze. 2007. A linguistic database with ontology-sensitive corpus querying. system demonstration at Datenstrukturen für linguistische Ressourcen und ihre Anwendungen. Frühjahrstagung der Gesellschaft für Linguistische Datenverarbeitung (GLDV 2007). Tübingen, Germany, April 2007.
10. C. Chiarcos, S. Dipper, M. Götze, et al. 2008. A flexible framework for integrating annotations from different tools and tag sets. TAL (Traitement Automatique des Langues), 49 (2).
11. C. Chiarcos, S. Hellmann, S. Nordhoff, et al. this vol. The Open Linguistics Working Group.
12. C. Chiarcos. 2008. An ontology of linguistic annotations. LDV Forum, 23 (1):1-16.
13. C. Chiarcos. 2010a. Grounding an ontology of linguistic annotations in the Data Category Registry. In LREC 2010 Workshop on Language Resource and Language Technology Standards (LT<S), pages 37-40, Valetta, Malta, May.
14. C. Chiarcos. 2010b. Towards robust multi-tool tagging. An OWL/DL-based approach. In Proc. ACL 2010, pages 659-670, Uppsala, Sweden, July.
15. C. Chiarcos. 2012. Interoperability of Corpora and Annotations. In C. Chiarcos, S. Nordhoff, and S. Hellmann, editors, Linked Data in Linguistics. Representing and Connecting Language Data and Language Metadata, pages 161-179, Heidelberg. Springer. C. Chiarcos. this vol. A generic formalism to represent linguistic corpora in RDF and OWL/DL.
16. P. Cimiano and U. Reyle. 2003. Ontology-based semantic construction, underspecification and disambiguation. In Proc. Lorraine/SaarlandWorkshop on Prospects and Recent Advances in the Syntax-Semantics Interface, pages 33-38, Nancy, France.
17. H. Cunningham. 2002. Gate, a general architecture for text engineering. Computers and the Humanities, 36 (2):223-254.
18. M. T. Egner, M. Lorch, and E. Biddle. 2007. UIMA Grid: Distributed large-scale text analysis. In Proc. 7th IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID'07), pages 317-326, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, May.
19. T. Erjavec. 2004. MULTEXT-East version 3. In Proc. LREC 2004, pages 1535-1538, Lisboa, Portugal.
20. S. Farrar and D. T. Langendoen. 2010. An OWL-DL implementation of GOLD: An ontology for the Semantic Web. In A. W. Witt and D. Metzing, editors, Linguistic Modeling of Information and Markup Languages: Contributions to Language Technology. Springer, Dordrecht.
21. D. Ferrucci and A. Lally. 2004. UIMA: An architectural approach to unstructured information processing in the corporate research environment. Natural Language Engineering, 10 (3/4):327-348.
22. C. J. Fillmore. 1968. The case for case. In E. Bach and R. T. Harms, editors, Universals in Linguistic Theory, pages 1-88. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
23. G. Francopoulo, T. Declerck, V. Sornlertlamvanich, et al. 2008. Data Category Registry: Morpho-syntactic and syntactic profiles. In Proc. LREC-2008 Workshop on Uses and Usage of Language Resource-Related Standards, Marrakech, Morocco, May.
24. H. Halteren, J. Zavrel, and W. Daelemans. 2001. Improving accuracy in word class tagging through the combination of machine learning systems. Computational Linguistics, 27 (2):199-229.
25. S. Hellmann, J. Unbehauen, C. Chiarcos, and A. Ngonga Ngomo. 2010. The TIGER Corpus Navigator. In Proc. 9th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT-9), pages 91-102, Tartu, Estonia.
26. S. Hellmann. 2010. The semantic gap of formalized meaning. In Proc. 7th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2010), Heraklion, Greece.
27. N. Ide and J. Pustejovsky. 2010. What does interoperability mean, anyway? Toward an operational definition of interoperability. In Proc. 2nd International Conference on Global Interoperability for Language Resources (ICGL 2010).
28. N. Ide, C. Baker, C. Fellbaum, C. Fillmore, and R. Passonneau. 2008. MASC: The Manually Annotated Sub-Corpus of American English. In Proc. 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2008), Marrakesh, Morocco.
29. M. Kemps-Snijders, M. Windhouwer, P. Wittenburg, and S. E. Wright. 2009. ISOcat: Remodelling metadata for language resources. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 4 (4):261-276.
30. M. Kemps-Snijders. 2010. RELISH: Rendering endangered languages lexicons interoperable through standards harmonisation. In 7th SaLTMiL Workshop on Creation and use of basic lexical resources for lessresourced languages, held in conjunction with LREC 2010, Valetta, Malta, May.
31. G. Leech and A. Wilson. 1996. EAGLES recommendations for the morphosyntactic annotation of corpora. Version of March 1996.
32. J. Lehmann, S. Auer, S. Tramp, et al. 2011. Class expression learning for ontology engineering. Journal of Web Semantics, 9 (1):71-81.
33. J. McCrae, D. Spohr, and P. Cimiano. 2011. Linking lexical resources and ontologies on the semantic web with Lemon. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pages 245-259.
34. A. Pareja-Lora and G. Aguado de Cea. 2010. Ontologybased interoperation of linguistic tools for an improved lemma annotation in Spanish. In Proc. LREC 2010, Valetta, Malta.
35. G. Rehm, R. Eckart, and C. Chiarcos. 2007. An OWL-and XQuery-based mechanism for the retrieval of linguistic patterns from XML-corpora. In Proc. RANLP 2007, Borovets, Bulgaria.
36. E. Rubiera, L. Polo, D. Berrueta, and A. El Ghali. Accepted. TELIX: An RDF-based model for linguistic annotation. In Proc. 9th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2012).
37. G. Sampson. 1995. English for the computer: The SUSANNE corpus and analytic scheme. Oxford University Press.
38. B. Santorini, 1990. Part-of-speech tagging guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project. Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania. Technical report MS-CIS-90-47.
39. A. Saulwick, M. Windhouwer, A. Dimitriadis, and R. Goedemans. 2005. Distributed tasking in ontology mediated integration of typological databases for linguistic research. In Proc. 17th Conf. on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE'05), Porto.
40. A. Schiller, S. Teufel, C. Stöckert, and C. Thielen. 1999. Guidelines für das Tagging deutscher Textcorpora mit STTS. Technical report, Universities of Stuttgart and Tübingen.
41. H. Schmid and F. Laws. 2008. Estimation of conditional probabilities with decision trees and an application to fine-grained pos tagging. In Proc. COLING 2008, Manchester, UK.
42. T. Schmidt, C. Chiarcos, T. Lehmberg, et al. 2006. Avoiding data graveyards. In Proc. E-MELD Workshop 2006, Ypsilanti.
43. I. Schuurman and M. A. Windhouwer. 2011. Explicit semantics for enriched documents. What do ISOcat, RELcat and SCHEMAcat have to offer? In Proc. 2nd Supporting Digital Humanities conference (SDH 2011), Copenhagen, Denmark, November.
44. G. F. Simons, W. D. Lewis, S. O. Farrar, et al. 2004. The semantics of markup. In Proc. 4thWorkshop on NLP and XML (NLPXML-2004), pages 25-32, Barcelona, Spain, July.
45. W. Skut, T. Brants, B. Krenn, and H. Uszkoreit. 1998. A linguistically interpreted corpus of German newspaper text. In Proc. ESSLLI Workshop on Recent Advances in Corpus Annotation, Saarbrücken, Germany.
46. Manfred Stede. 2004. The Potsdam Commentary Corpus. In Proc. ACL-2004 Workshop on Discourse Annotation, pages 96-102, Barcelona, Spain, July.
47. P. Tapanainen and T. Järvinen. 1997. A nonprojective dependency parser. In Proc. 5th Conference on Applied NLP, pages 64-71, Washington, DC.
48. H. Telljohann, E. W. Hinrichs, and S. Kübler. 2003. Stylebook for the Tübingen treebank of written German (TüBa-D/Z). Technical report, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
49. S. Teufel. 1995. A support tool for tagset mapping. In Proc. EACL-1995 SIGDAT Workshop: From Text to Tags.
50. K. Verspoor, W. Baumgartner, C. Roeder, and L. Hunter. 2009. Abstracting the types away from a UIMA type system. In C. Chiarcos, R. Eckhart de Castilho, and M. Stede, editors, From Form to Meaning: Processing Texts Automatically, pages 249-256. Gunter Narr.
51. M. Windhouwer and S. E. Wright. 2012. Linking to linguistic data categories in ISOcat. In C. Chiarcos, S. Nordhoff, and S. Hellmann, editors, Linked Data in Linguistics. Representing and Connecting Language Data and Language Metadata, pages 99-107. Springer, Heidelberg.