Ontology-based interface specifications for an NLP pipeline architecture

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 847-854

  Buyko, Ekaterina ^a   Chiarcos, Christian ^b   Lora, Antonio Pareja ^c  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PIPELINE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PROGRAM PROCESSORS; SPECIFICATIONS;

DATA-DRIVEN ARCHITECTURES; INTERFACE SPECIFICATION; LINGUISTIC ANNOTATIONS; MODULAR ARCHITECTURES; NEUTRAL PROCESSING; PIPELINE ARCHITECTURE; PROCESSING MODULES; SEMANTIC WEB APPLICATIONS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 84964029459     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. G. Aguado de Cea, I. Álvarez de Mony Rego, A. Gómez-Pérez, A. Pareja-Lora, and R. Plaza-Arteche. 2002. A semantic web page linguistic annotation model. In Proc. AAAI'2002 Workshop: Semantic Web Meets Language Resources (AAAI Technical Report WS-02-16), pages 20-29.
2. G. Aguado de Cea, I. Álvarez de Mony Rego, A. Gómez-Pérez, and A. Pareja-Lora. 2003. OntoTag: XML/RDF (S)/OWL Semantic Web page annotation in ContentWeb. In Proc. NLPXML-2003.
3. G. Aguado de Cea, I. Álvarez de Mony Rego, and A. Pareja-Lora. 2004. OntoTag's linguistic ontologies: Enhancing higher level and Semantic Web annotations. In Proc. LREC 2004, volume VI, pages 1905-1908.
4. F. J. Arrizabalaga-Hernández. 2004. OntoTagger: Herramienta de anotación lingüístico-ontológica. M. Sc. Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
5. J. Atwell, J. Hughes, and C. Couter. 1994. AMAL-GAM: Automatic Mapping Among Lexico-Grammatical Annotation Models. In Resnik P Klavans J, editor, The Balancing Act: Combining Symbolic and Statistical Approaches to Language. Association for Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces.
6. G. Ben-Avi and N. Francez. 2004. Categorial grammar with ontology-refined types. In Proc. Categorial Grammars - An efficient tool for Natural Language Processing, Montpellier, France.
7. T. Berners-Lee and M. Fischetti. 1999. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by its Inventor. Harper, San Francisco.
8. J. Blythe and Y. Gil. 2004. Incremental formalization of document annotations through ontology-based paraphrasing. In WWW'04: Proc. 13th Int'l Conf on World Wide Web, pages 455-461, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
9. A. Burchardt, S. Pado, D. Spohr, A. Frank, and U. Heid. 2008. Formalising Multi-layer Corpora in OWL DL - Lexicon Modelling, Querying and Consistency Control. In Proc. 3rd Int'l Joint Conf on NLP (IJCNLP 2008), Hyderabad, India.
10. Ch. Chiarcos. 2006. Avoiding Data Graveyards: Deriving an Ontology for Accessing Heterogeneous Data Collections. In Proc. Ontologies in Text Technology (OTT'06), pages 113-118, Osnabrück, Germany.
11. Ch. Chiarcos. to appear. An ontology of linguistic annotations. GLDV-Journal for Computational Linguistics and Language Technology.
12. P. Cimiano and U. Reyle. 2003. Ontology-based semantic construction, underspecification and disambiguation. In Proc. Prospects and Advances in the Syntax-Semantic Interface.
13. S. Farrar and D. T. Langendoen. 2003. A Linguistic Ontology for the Semantic Web. GLOT International, 7:97-100.
14. D. Ferrucci and A. Lally. 2004. UIMA: an architectural approach to unstructured information processing in the corporate research environment. Natural Language Engineering, 10 (3-4) :327-348.
15. T. Götz and O. Suhre. 2004. Design and implementation of the UIMA Common Analysis System. IBM Systems Journal, 43(3):476-489.
16. U. Hahn, E. Buyko, K. Tomanek, S. Piao, J. McNaught, Y. Tsuruoka, and S. Ananiadou. 2007. An annotation type system for a data-driven NLP pipeline. In Proc. Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW 2007).
17. E. Hovy, M. Marcus, M. Palmer, L. Ramshaw, and R. Weischedel. 2006. OntoNotes: The 90% Solution. In HLT-NAACL06.
18. N. Ide and L. Romary. 2004. A registry of standard data categories for linguistic annotation. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), pages 135-139, Lisbon.
19. G. Leech and A. Wilson. 1996. Recommendations for the morphosyntactic annotation of corpora (EAG-TCWG-MAC/R). Technical report, EAGLES.
20. G. Leech, R. Barnett, and P. Kahrel. 1996. Recommendations for the Syntactic Annotation of Corpora (EAG-TCWG-SASG/1.8). Technical report, EAGLES.
21. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. A. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
22. T. Ohta, Y. Tateisi, and J.-D. Kim. 2002. The Genia corpus: An annotated research abstract corpus in molecular biology domain. In Proc. of the 2nd HLT, pages 82-86.
23. G. Rehm, R. Eckart, Ch. Chiarcos, and J. Dellert. 2008. Ontology-Based XQuery'ing of XML-Encoded Language Resources on Multiple Annotation Layers. In Proc. LREC 2008, Marrakech, Morocco.
24. Th. Schmidt, Ch. Chiarcos, T. Lehmberg, G. Rehm, A. Witt, and E. Hinrichs. 2006. Avoiding Data Graveyards: From Heterogeneous Data Collected in Multiple Research Projects to Sustainable Linguistic Resources. In Proc. E-MELD Workshop on Digital Language Documentation, East Lansing, Michigan.
25. A. I. Serradilla-Fernández. 2004. Integración de recursos semánticos y aprendizaje de named entities en OntoTagger. M. Sc. Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
26. G. F. Simons, W. D. Lewis, S. O. Farrar, D. T. Langendoen, B. Fitzsimons, and H. Gonzalez. 2004. The semantics of markup: Mapping legacy markup schemas to a common semantics. In Proc. NLPXML-2004, pages 25-32, Barcelona, Spain.
27. G. Wilcock. 2007. An OWL Ontology for HPSG. In Proc. ACL 2007, pages 169-172, Prague, Czech Republic.