Targeted selection of brownfields from portfolios for sustainable regeneration: User experiences from five cases testing the Timbre Brownfield Prioritization Tool

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 184, Issue , 2016, Pages 94-107

  Bartke, Stephan ^a,b   Martinát, Stanislav ^c   Klusáček, Petr ^c   Pizzol, Lisa ^d   Alexandrescu, Filip ^d,e   Frantál, Bohumil ^c   Critto, Andrea ^d   Zabeo, Alex ^d  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b German Environment Agency   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE OF GEONICS   (Czech Republic)

^d CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

^e Institute for Quality of Life Research (ICCV)   (Romania)

Author keywords

Brownfield; Case studies; Decision support; Portfolio; Prioritization; Stakeholder; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; INVESTMENTS; LAND USE; OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

ANALYSIS APPROACH; BROWNFIELDS; CASE-STUDIES; DECISION SUPPORTS; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; PORTFOLIO; PRIORITIZATION; REAL-ESTATES; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BROWNFIELD SITE; DECISION ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECONOMIC REGENERATION; EUROPEAN UNION; LAND MANAGEMENT; PRIORITIZATION; REDEVELOPMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY;

CLINICAL ARTICLE; CZECH REPUBLIC; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GERMANY; HUMAN; PROBABILITY; REGENERATION; ROMANIA; SCIENTIST; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; POLLUTION; PROCEDURES;

CZECH REPUBLIC; GERMANY; ROMANIA;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CZECH REPUBLIC; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND REMEDIATION; GERMANY; HUMANS; ROMANIA;

EID: 85003530573     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.037     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agostini, P., Pizzol, L., Critto, A., D'Alessandro, M., Zabeo, A., Marcomini, A., Regional risk assessment for contaminated sites part 3: spatial decision support system. Environ. Int. 48 (2012), 121–132, 10.1016/j.envint.2012.07.005.
2. Alexandrescu, F., Martinát, S., Klusáček, P., Bartke, S., The path from passivity toward entrepreneurship: public sector actors in brownfield regeneration processes in central and eastern Europe. Organ. Environ. 27:2 (2014), 181–201, 10.1177/1086026614529436.
3. Alvarez-Guerra, M., Viguri, J.R., Voulvoulis, N., A multicriteria-based methodology for site prioritisation in sediment management. Environ. Int. 35:6 (2009), 920–930, 10.1016/j.envint.2009.03.012.
4. st century. Science, 348(6235), 2015, 647, 10.1126/science.1261071.
5. Bartke, S., Valuation of market uncertainties for contaminated land. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. M. 15:4 (2011), 356–378, 10.3846/1648715X.2011.633771.
6. Bartke, S., Schwarze, R., No perfect tools: trade-offs of sustainability principles and user requirements in designing support tools for land-use decisions between greenfields and brownfields. J. Environ. Manage. 153 (2015), 11–24, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.040.
7. Bartke, S., Bielke, A., Homuth, A., Roselt, K., Zill, T., Das TIMBRE Priorisierungstool: Brachflächenbewertung von Grundstücksportfolien in Sachsen und Thüringen. Altlastenspektrum 23:5 (2014), 202–210 AltS.05.2014.202.
8. Bateman, I.J., Harwood, A.R., Mace, G.M., Watson, R.T., Abson, D.J., Andrews, B., Termansen, M., Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science 341:6141 (2013), 45–50, 10.1126/science.1234379.
9. Bleicher, A., Groß, M., Sustainability assessment and the revitalization of contaminated sites: operationalizing sustainable development for local problems. Int. J. Sust. Dev. World 17:1 (2010), 57–66, 10.1080/13504500903488263.
10. Boggia, A., Cortina, C., Measuring sustainable development using a multi-criteria model: a case study. J. Environ. Manage. 91:11 (2010), 2301–2306, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.009.
11. Brinkhoff, P., Multi-criteria Analysis for Assessing Sustainability of Remedial Actions – Applications in Contaminated Land Development – a Literature Review. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Report 2011:14, 2011, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg.
12. Brno, 2015. SM Brno, KÚ pro JMK, ČUZK, http://gis.brno.cz/flex/flexviewer/index.php?project=gismb_brownfields_public.
13. CEN, Glossary of Terms for Holistic Management of Brownfield Regeneration (GoT-HOMBRE). 2014 CEN Workshop Agreement 74 https://www.cen.eu/work/areas/env/Pages/WS-74.aspx.
14. Chen, Y., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Zhu, Y., A strategic classification support system for brownfield redevelopment. Environ. Modell. Softw. 24:5 (2009), 647–654, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.10.011.
15. Cheng, F., Geertman, S., Kuffer, M., Zhan, Q., An integrative methodology to improve brownfield redevelopment planning in Chinese cities: a case study of Futian, Shenzhen. Comput. Environ. Urban 35:5 (2011), 388–398, 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.05.007.
16. Chrysochoou, M., Browna, K., Dahala, G., Granda-Carvajalb, K., Segersonb, K., Garricka, N., Bagtzogloua, A., A GIS and indexing scheme to screen brownfields for area-wide redevelopment planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 105:3 (2012), 187–198, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.010.
17. Cobârzan, B., Brownfield redevelopment in Romania. Transylv. Rev. Adm. Sci. 21:E (2007), 28–46 http://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/370/360.
18. Critto, A., Cantarella, L., Carlon, C., Giove, S., Petruzzelli, G., Marcomini, A., Decision support-oriented selection of remediation technologies to rehabilitate contaminated sites. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2:3 (2006), 273–285, 10.1002/ieam.5630020307.
19. Doleželová, L., Hadlač, M., Kadlecová, M., Martinát, S., Polednik, M., Redevelopment potential of brownfields: A-B-C classification and its practical application. E+M Ekon. a Manag. 17:2 (2014), 34–44, 10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-003.
20. Domalewski, P., Baxa, J., The development of regional differentiation of office construction in the Czech Republic: 1990–2010. Morav. Geogr. Rep. 23:1 (2015), 21–33, 10.1515/mgr-2015-0003.
21. EC, Commission Staff Working Document : Guidelines on Best Practices to Limit, Mitigate or Compensate Soil Sealing. SWD(2012) 101 final 12 April, 2012, European Commission, Brussels.
22. Frantál, B., Klusáček, P., Kunc, J., Martinát, S., Osman, R., Bartke, S., Alexandrescu, F., Hohmuth, A., Bielke, A., Pizzol, L., Rizzo, E., Krupanek, J., Sileam, T., Report on Results of Survey on Brownfield Regeneration and Statistical Analysis., 2012, 76, 10.13140/2.1.1546.7202 TIMBRE deliverable D3.1v3.
23. Frantál, B., Greer-Wootten, B., Klusáček, P., Krejčí, T., Kunc, J., Martinát, S., Exploring spatial patterns of urban brownfields regeneration: the case of Brno, Czech Republic. Cities 44 (2015), 9–18, 10.1016/j.cities.2014.12.007.
24. Gardi, C., Panagos, P., Van Liedekerke, M., Bosco, C., De Brogniez, D., Land take and food security: assessment of land take on the agricultural production in Europe. J. Environ. Plann. Man. 58:5 (2015), 898–912, 10.1080/09640568.2014.899490.
25. Hartmuth, G., Huber, K., Rink, D., Operationalization and contextualization of sustainability at the local level. Sustain. Dev. 16:4 (2008), 261–270, 10.1002/sd.377.
26. Kiker, G.A., Bridges, T.S., Varghese, A., Seager, T.P., Linkov, I., Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 1:2 (2005), 95–108, 10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1.
27. Klusáček, P., Frantál, B., Kunc, J., Martinat, S., Osmar, R., Zabeo, A., Bartke, S., Finkel, M., Morio, M., Cosmo, L., Pizzol, P., Prioritization Tool, Software, and Manual. 2013, 68, 10.13140/2.1.1382.8807 TIMBRE deliverable D3.2v4.
28. Klusáček, P., Frantál, B., Kunc, J., Martinat, S., Osmar, R., Zabeo, A., Cosmo, L., Alexandrescu, F., Brückmann, C., Bartke, S., Finkel, M., Morio, M., Pizzol, P., Krupanek, J., Homuth, A., Sileam, T., Prioritization Tool: Results of Demonstration Studies and Outreach Material. 2014, 138, 10.13140/2.1.3078.6247 TIMBRE deliverable D3.3v4.
29. Klusáček, P., Havlíček, M., Dvořák, P., Kunc, J., Martinát, S., Tonev, P., From wasted land to megawatts: how to convert brownfields into solar power plants (the case of the Czech Republic). Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 62:3 (2014), 517–528, 10.11118/actaun201462030517.
30. Krogerus, M., Tschäppler, R., 50 Erfolgsmodelle - Handbuch für strategische Entscheidungen. 2008, Kein & Aber, Zürich & Berlin.
31. Kunc, J., Martinát, S., Tonev, P., Frantál, B., Destiny of urban brownfields: spatial patterns and perceived consequences of post-socialistic deindustrialization. Transylv. Rev. Adm. Sci. 41E (2014), 109–128.
32. Manning, S., Boons, F., von Hagen, O., Reinecke, J., National contexts matter: the co-evolution of sustainability standards in global value chains. Ecol. Econ. 83 (2011), 197–209, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.029.
33. Markowitz, H., Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7:1 (1952), 77–91, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x.
34. Nogués, S., Arroyo, N., Alternative approach to prioritization of brownfield reclamation attending to urban development potentialities: case study in a depressed industrial district in northern Spain. J. Urban Plann. Dev., 142, 2016, 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000272 05015002.
35. Osman, R., Frantál, B., Klusáček, P., Kunc, J., Martinát, S., Factors affecting brownfield regeneration in post-socialist space: the case of the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy 48 (2015), 309–316, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.003.
36. Pizzol, L., Critto, A., Agostini, P., Marcomini, A., Regional risk assessment for contaminated sites Part 2: ranking of potentially contaminated sites. Environ. Int. 37 (2011), 1307–1320, 10.1016/j.envint.2011.05.010.
37. Pizzol, L., Zabeo, A., Klusáček, P., Giubilato, E., Critto, A., Frantál, B., Martinát, S., Kunc, J., Osman, R., Bartke, S., Timbre Brownfield Prioritization Tool to support effective brownfield regeneration. J. Environ. Manage. 116 (2016), 178–192, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.030.
38. Reinecke, J., Manning, S., von Hagen, O., The emergence of a standards market: multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organ. Stud. 33:5/6 (2012), 789–812, 10.1177/0170840612443629.
39. Rizzo, E., Pesce, M., Pizzol, L., Alexandrescu, F., Giubilato, E., Critto, A., Marcomini, A., Bartke, S., Brownfield regeneration in Europe: identifying stakeholder perceptions, concerns, attitudes and information needs. Land Use Policy 43 (2015), 437–453, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.012.
40. Rosén, L., Back, P.E., Söderqvist, T., Norrman, J., Brinkhoff, P., Norberg, T., Volchko, Y., Norin, M., Bergknut, M., Döberl, G., SCORE: a novel multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing the sustainability of contaminated land remediation. Sci. Total Environ. 511 (2015), 621–638, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.058.
41. Schädler, S., Morio, M., Bartke, S., Rohr-Zänker, R., Finkel, M., Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model. J. Environ. Manage. 92:3 (2011), 827–837, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.026.
42. Schädler, S., Morio, M., Bartke, S., Finkel, M., Integrated planning and spatial evaluation of megasite remediation and reuse options. J. Contam. Hydrol. 127:1–4 (2012), 88–100, 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2011.03.003.
43. Schiller, G., Blum, A., Hecht, R., Meinel, G., Oertel, H., Ferber, U., Petermann, E., Innenentwicklungspotenziale in Deutschland – Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Umfrage und Möglichkeiten einer automatisierten Abschätzung. Special publication of Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung, 2013, Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Bonn.
44. Smith, J.W.N., Kerrison, G., Benchmarking of decision-support tools used for tiered sustainable remediation appraisal. Water Air Soil Pollut. 224:12 (2013), 1706–1716, 10.1007/s11270-013-1706-y.
45. Sparrevik, M., Barton, D.N., Bates, M.E., Linkov, I., Use of stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis to support sustainable management of contaminated sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46:3 (2012), 1326–1334, 10.1021/es202225x.
46. Thornton, G., Franz, M., Edwards, D., Pahlen, G., Nathanail, P., The challenge of sustainability: incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 10:2 (2007), 116–134, 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.08.008.
47. Tintera, J., Ruus, A., Tohvri, E., Kotval, Z., Urban brownfields in Estonia: scope, consequences and redevelopment barriers as perceived by local governments. Morav. Geogr. Rep. 22:4 (2014), 25–38 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2014-0021.
48. UN, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 20 December 2013., 2014 [on the report of the Second Committee (A/68/444)] - 68/232. World Soil Day and International Year of Soils http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/68/232&Lang=E.
49. Volchko, Y., Norrman, J., Rosén, L., Bergknut, M., Josefsson, S., Söderqvist, T., Norberg, T., Wiberg, K., Tysklind, M., Using soil function evaluation in multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainability appraisal of remediation alternatives. Sci. Total Environ. 485 (2014), 785–791, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.087.
50. WCED, World commission on environment and development. Our Common Future, 1987, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
51. Zabeo, A., Pizzol, L., Agostini, P., Critto, A., Giove, S., Marcomini, A., Regional risk assessment for contaminated sites part 1: vulnerability assessment by multicriteria decision analysis. Environ. Int. 37 (2011), 1295–1306, 10.1016/j.envint.2011.05.005.