An integrative methodology to improve brownfield redevelopment planning in Chinese cities: A case study of Futian, Shenzhen

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 388-398

  Cheng, Fangfang ^a,b   Geertman, Stan ^a   Kuffer, Monika ^b   Zhan, Qingming ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Brownfield redevelopment; China; Identification; Planning support methodology; Prioritization

Indexed keywords

BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT; BROWNFIELD SITES; BROWNFIELDS; CHINA; CHINESE CITIES; CLASSIFICATION CODES; DEVELOPMENT PLANS; ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES; ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; LOCAL DATA; PLANNING SUPPORT METHODOLOGY; PRIORITIZATION; URBAN PLANNERS;

BROWNFIELD SITE; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; REDEVELOPMENT; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

CHINA; GUANGDONG; SHENZHEN;

EID: 84860418173     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abramson D.B. Urban planning in China. Journal of the American Planning Association 2006, 72:197-215.
2. Alker S., Joy V., Roberts P., Smith N. The definition of brownfield. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2000, 43:49-69.
3. Baird M. Comparing cases: Studies of commitment systems in Australia and the United States. International Journal of Human Resource Management 2004, 15:433-440.
4. Bezama A., Agüero R., Márquez F., Barrera S., Salazar N., Lorber K.E. Land register of contaminated sites in an industrial Chilean region: Identification and evaluation of suspected sites. Waste Management 2008, 28:588-596.
5. Brachman L. Turning brownfields into community assets: Barriers to redevelopment. Recycling the city: The use and reuse of urban land 2004, Cambridge Press, Massachusetts. R. Greenstein, Y. Sungu-Eryilmaz (Eds.).
6. Brebbia C.A., Almorza D., Klapperich H. Brownfields III: Prevention, assessment, rehabilitation and development of brownfield sites 2006, WIT.
7. Bruton M.J., Bruton S.G., Li Y. Shenzhen: Coping with uncertainties in planning. Habitat International 2005, 29:227-243.
8. Cao K., Guan H. Brownfield redevelopment toward sustainable urban land use in China. Chinese Geographical Science 2007, 17:127-134.
9. Cartier C. Transnational urbanism in the reform-era Chinese city: Landscapes from Shenzhen. Urban Studies 2002, 39:1513-1532.
10. Coffin S.L. Closing the brownfield information gap: Some practical methods for identifying brownfields. Environmental Practice 2003, 5:34-39.
11. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989, 35:982-1003.
12. De Sousa C. Contaminated sites: The Canadian situation in an international context. Journal of Environmental Management 2001, 62:131-154.
13. De Sousa C.A. Brownfield redevelopment in Toronto: An examination of past trends and future prospects. Land Use Policy 2002, 19:297-309.
14. De Sousa C.A. Turning brownfields into green space in the city of Toronto. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 62:181-198.
15. De Sousa C. Policy performance and brownfield redevelopment in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Professional Geographer 2005, 57:312-327.
16. De Sousa C.A. Urban brownfields redevelopment in Canada: The role of local government. Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien 2006, 50:392-407.
17. Ding C. Land policy reform in China: Assessment and prospects. Land Use Policy 2003, 20:109-120.
18. Dixon T. The property development industry and sustainable urban brownfield regeneration in England: An analysis of case studies in Thames Gateway and Greater Manchester. Urban Studies 2007, 44:2379-2400.
19. Dixon T., Adams D. Housing supply and brownfield regeneration in a post-Barker world: Is there enough brownfield land in England and Scotland?. Urban Studies 2008, 45:115-139.
20. Evans A. The economics of vacant land. Recycling the city: The use and reuse of urban land 2004, Cambridge Press, Massachusetts. R. Greenstein, Y. Sungu-Eryilmaz (Eds.).
21. Fan, X. (2010). Largest national contaminated land: 120 million compensated to developer by Wuhan Land Administration Bureau Chutian Jin Bao.
22. Ganser R., Williams K. Brownfield development: Are we using the right targets? Evidence from England and Germany. European Planning Studies 2007, 15:603-622.
23. Gar-on Yeh A., Wu F. The transformation of the urban planning system in China from a centrally-planned to transitional economy. Progress in Planning 1999, 51:167-252.
24. Hao P., Sliuzas R., Geertman S. The development and redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen. Habitat International 2011, 35:214-224.
25. Hartwick J., Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science 1994, 40:440-465.
26. Hayek M., Novak M., Arku G., Gilliland J. Mapping industrial legacies: Building a comprehensive brownfield database in geographic information systems. Planning Practice & Research 2010, 25:461-475.
27. He S., Wu F. Property-led redevelopment in post-reform China: A case study of Xintiandi redevelopment project in Shanghai. Journal of Urban Affairs 2005, 27:1-23.
28. Howland M. The role of contamination in central city industrial decline. Economic Development Quarterly 2004, 18:207-219.
29. Jefferson G.H., Rawski T.G. Enterprise reform in Chinese industry. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1994, 8:47-70.
30. Lahdelma R., Salminen P., Hokkanen J. Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management. Environmental Management 2000, 26:595-605.
31. Li L. De-industrialization and development of industrial heritage tourism: The actual process and development model of Ruhr in Germany. World Regional Studies 2002, 11:57-65.
32. Li Q. Urban planning and heritage conservation 2003, Dongnan University Press, Nanjing.
33. Li D., Chen B. The strategy of the re-use of the old industrial land in Yangpu, Shanghai. Urban Planning Review 2005, 155:44-50.
34. Luo J. China's legislation for preventing and controlling soil contamination. Modern Law Science 2007, 29:99-107.
35. Luo Q., Catney P., Lerner D. Risk-based management of contaminated land in the UK: Lessons for China?. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:1123-1134.
36. Ma L.J.C. Economic reforms, urban spatial restructuring, and planning in China. Progress in Planning 2004, 61:237-260.
37. Ma L.J.C. Urban administrative restructuring, changing scale relations and local economic development in China. Political Geography 2005, 24:477-497.
38. Meng F., Feng C. The rudiments of affordable housing in China. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 2005, 4:431-437.
39. Moss T. Utilities, land-use change, and urban development: Brownfield sites as 'cold-spots' of infrastructure networks in Berlin. Environment and Planning A 2003, 35:511-529.
40. Munda G. Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research 2004, 158:662-677.
41. Ng M.K. Shenzhen. Cities 2003, 20:429-441.
42. Niu H. Brownfields redevelopment in the United States. Urban Planning Overseas 2001, 15:26-30.
43. Noonan F., Vidich C.A. Decision analysis for utilizing hazardous waste site assessments in real estate acquisition. Risk Analysis 1992, 12:245-251.
44. Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences (2009). Environmental report Expo 2010. Shanghai China, Shanghai.
45. Shenzhen Statistical Bureau (2006). Shenzhen statistical yearbook 2005. Shenzhen: Shenzhen Statistics Press.
46. Thomas M.R. A GIS-based decision support system for brownfield redevelopment. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 58:7-23.
47. Thornton G., Franz M., Edwards D., Pahlen G., Nathanail P. The challenge of sustainability: Incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy 2007, 10:116-134.
48. USEPA (2002). Brownfield definition. US EPA brownfields homepage.
49. van Vliet D. Brownfield sites: Assessment, rehabilitation & development. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 2003, 12:147-149.
50. Voogd H. Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning 1983, Pion, London.
51. Voogd H. The changing role of evaluation methods in a changing planning environment: Some Dutch experiences. European Planning Studies 1997, 5:257.
52. Walton W. Windfall sites for housing: An underestimated resource. Urban Studies 2000, 37:391-409.
53. Wei Y. Urban land use transformation and determinants of urban land use size in China. GeoJournal 1993, 30:435-440.
54. Wei Y. Planning Chinese cities: The limits of transitional institutions. Urban Geography 2005, 26:200-221.
55. Wu F.L. Residential relocation under market-oriented redevelopment: The process and outcomes in urban China. Geoforum 2004, 35:453-470.
56. Wu H., Chen C. A pilot case study of brownfield high-density housing development in China. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 2010, 3:119-131.
57. Yang, C. (2010). Experts call for legislative proposal and information disclosure for land contamination. Southern Metropolis Daily.
58. Yang Y.R., Chang C.H. An urban regeneration regime in China: A case study of urban redevelopment in Shanghai's Taipingqiao area. Urban Studies 2007, 44:1809-1826.
59. Zeng G., Zhong Z., Zeng B., Huang G.G.H. Research of the uncertainty in environmental risk assessment. China Environmental Science 1998, 18:252-255.
60. Zhao Q., Yang K., Zhang Y. Environmental economic approach to land contamination control. Environmental Science and Technology 2005, 28:49-87.
61. Zhou K., Cao X., Tan B. Toward an improved legislative framework for China's land degradation control. Natural Resources Forum 2008, 32:11-24.
62. Zhou Y.X., Ma L.J.C. Economic restructuring and suburbanization in China. Urban Geography 2000, 21:205-236.
63. Zhu J. Shenzhen's role and denationalization in China: Reply to Michael Leaf. Cities 1996, 13:199-201.
64. Zhu J. The formation of a market-oriented local property development industry in transitional China: A Shenzhen case study. Environment and Planning A 1999, 31:1839-1856.
65. Zhu J. Local developmental state and order in China's urban development during transition. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2004, 28:424-447.
66. Zhu J.M. A transitional institution for the emerging land market in urban China. Urban Studies 2005, 42:1369-1390.
67. Zhu, Y., Hipel, K. W., & Guo, P. (2008). A research framework for tackling brownfield problems in China using project management theory. In IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, 2008, Singapore (pp. 3298-3303).
68. Zhu, Y., Hipel, K. W., & Guo, P. (2009). Establishment of the index system for evaluation of brownfield redevelopment projects in China. In IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, 2009, 11-14 October, San Antonio, Texas, USA (pp. 1521-1526).
69. Zhu, Y., Su, H., Pan, Q., Guo, P., & Yu, M. (2009). Application of structural equation modeling to assign the weights for evaluation indexes of brownfield development project. In IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, 2009, 8-11 December, Hong Kong (pp. 588-592).
70. Zou, S. (2006). China's first national survey of land contamination. Xinhua News.