Integrated planning and spatial evaluation of megasite remediation and reuse options

Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

Volumn 127, Issue 1-4, 2012, Pages 88-100

  Schädler, Sebastian ^a   Morio, Maximilian ^a   Bartke, Stephan ^b   Finkel, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contaminated land; Decision support; Integrated assessment; Megasite redevelopment; Subsurface remediation; Sustainable land use

Indexed keywords

ABANDONED LAND; ASSESSMENT METHODS; BROWNFIELDS; CLEAN-UP COST; CONTAMINATED LANDS; CONTAMINATED SITES; DECISION SUPPORT; DECISION SUPPORTS; ECONOMIC SENSE; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; INTEGRATED PLANNING; MARKET VALUES; MEGA-SITES; MEGASITE REDEVELOPMENT; RE-PLANNING; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SCREENING LEVEL; SHARED VISION; SOCIOECONOMIC ASPECTS; SPATIAL INFORMATIONS; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT;

CONTAMINATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; LAND USE; RATING; REGIONAL PLANNING; REMEDIATION; VISUALIZATION;

ECONOMICS;

POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON;

ABANDONED LAND; BROWNFIELD SITE; CLEANUP; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; CONTAMINATED LAND; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; GIS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LAND USE PLANNING; REMEDIATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY;

AQUIFER; BIOREMEDIATION; CHLORINATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTAMINATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; GEOLOGY; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEGASITE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SOCIOECONOMICS;

BERLIN; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SOIL; TETRACHLOROETHYLENE; TRICHLOROETHYLENE; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 82755186144     PISSN: 01697722     EISSN: 18736009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2011.03.003     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (61)

1. A. Adair, J. Berry, S. McGreal, B. Deddis, and S. Hirst The financing of urban regeneration Land Use Policy 17 2 2000 147 156 (Pubitemid 30323145)
2. P. Agostini, C. Carlon, A. Critto, and A. Marcomini A step toward contaminated megasites management: six European experiences at comparison A.A. Velinni, Landfill Research Trends 2007 Nova Science Publishers Inc New York 47 75
3. P. Agostini, and A. Vega Decision Support Systems (DSSs) for contaminated land management - gaps and challenges A. Marcomini, G.W. Suter, A. Critto, Decision Support Systems for Risk-Based Management of Contaminated Sites 2007 Springer Heidelberg 275 280
4. N. Apostolidis, and N. Hutton Integrated water management in brownfield sites - more opportunities than you think Desalination 188 1-3 2006 169 175 (Pubitemid 43137484)
5. J.C. Ascough, H.R. Maier, J.K. Ravalico, and M.W. Strudley Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making Ecol. Model. 219 2008 383 399
6. ASTM Standard guide for risk based corrective action applied at petroleum release sites, E1739-95 (reapproved 2002) 1995 American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia
7. P.R. Bardos Sharing experiences in the management of megasites: towards a sustainable approach in land management of industrially contaminated areas. Final Report of the NICOLE workshop, October 2003, Lille (FR) NICOLE 2004 55
8. P.R. Bardos, C. Mariotti, F. Marot, and T. Sullivan Framework for decision support used in contaminated land management in Europe and North America Land Contam. Reclam. 9 1 2001 149 163 (Pubitemid 32258701)
9. S. Bartke, and R. Schwarze Marktorientierte Wertermittlung - Das EUGEN-Wertermittlungsmodul und das Konzept des Marktorientierten Risikoabschlags (MRA) BBG 2009 SINBRA-Methodenkatalog BBG, Zossen 96 111
10. S. Bartke, and R. Schwarze Mercantile Value Reduction: Accounting for Stigma on Contaminated Land in Germany. Paper presented at the 16th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference 2009, Stockholm 2009 http://eres.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?eres2009-353 Accessed October 25, 2010.
11. P. Bayer, M. Finkel, and G. Teutsch Cost-optimal contaminant plume management with a combination of pump-and-treat and physical barrier systems Ground Water Monit. R. 25 2 2005 96 106
12. BBodSchV Federal Soil Protection and Contaminated Sites Ordinance (BBodSchV) dated 12 July 1999, on the basis of Article 6, Article 8 (1) and (2) and Article 13 (1) second sentence of the Federal Soil Protection Act of 17 March 1998 Federal Law Gazette I 1999 German Federal Government Bonn 502
13. BMBF: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research Research for Sustainability Framework Programme of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for a sustainable, innovative society 56 p. Online: 2004 http://www.fona.de/download-publikation/research-for-sustainability.pdf accessed: November 04, 2010.
14. CABERNET Brownfield definition Online: 2005 http://www.cabernet.org.uk/ index.asp? c= 1270, accessed: October 04, 2010.
15. K. Cao, and H. Guan Brownfield redevelopment toward sustainable urban land use in China Chin. Geogr. Sci. 17 2 2007 127 134 (Pubitemid 46993271)
16. C. Carlon, A. Critto, E. Ramieri, and A. Marcomini DESYRE: Decision Support System for the Rehabilitation of contaminated megasites Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 3 2 2007 211 222
17. CEC: Commission of the European Communities Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Thematic Strategy on the Urban Environment 2006 COM(2005) 718 final, Brussels, 2006.
18. City of Potsdam City of Potsdam committee of valuation experts Personal communication 2009 February 22, 2009.
19. J.M. Clapp A semiparametric method for valuing residential locations: application to automated valuation J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 27 3 2003 303 320 (Pubitemid 38117899)
20. C.A. DeSousa Contaminated sites: the Canadian situation in an international context J. Environ. Manage. 62 2 2001 131 154
21. C.A. DeSousa Unearthing the benefits of brownfield to green space projects: an examination of project use and quality of life impacts Local Environ. 11 5 2006 577 600
22. DETR: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions Our Towns and Cities: The Future - Delivering the Urban Renaissance 2000 HMSO London
23. P.N. Duinker, and L.N. Greig Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: improving explorations of the future Environ. Impact. Asses. Rev. 27 2007 206 219 (Pubitemid 46400203)
24. EEA: European Environment Agency Management of Contaminated Sites in Western Europe 2000 Topic Report No. 13/1999.
25. E.D.G. Fraser, A.J. Dougill, W.E. Mabee, M. Reed, and P. McAlpine Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management J. Environ. Manage. 78 2 2006 114 127 (Pubitemid 43115576)
26. A.E. Gelfand, M.D. Ecker, J.R. Knight, and C.F. Sirmans Dynamics of location in home price J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 29 2 2004 149 166
27. R. Gregory, and P. Slovic A constructive approach to environmental valuation Ecol. Econ. 21 3 1997 175 181
28. A. Hassan Validation of numerical groundwater models used to guide decision making Ground Water 42 2 2004 277 290 (Pubitemid 38300147)
29. I.D. Haylamicheal, and M.A. Dalvie Disposal of obsolete pesticides, the case of Ethiopia Environ. Int. 35 3 2009 667 673
30. ICLEI Charter of European Cities and Towns Towards Sustainability. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) and Ministry of Urban Development and Transport of the Federal State of Northrhine- Westphalia, Germany 1994
31. IEM: Institute for Environmental Modeling at the University of Tennessee. Spatial Analysis and Decision Assistance (SADA) 2005 http://www.tiem.utk.edu/ ~sada/index.shtml Accessed 22 October 2010.
32. T.O. Jackson Environmental contamination and industrial real estate prices J. Real Estate Res. 23 2 2002 179 199
33. A.J. Jakeman, S.H. Chen, A.E. Rizzoli, and A.A. Voinov Modelling and software as instruments for advancing sustainability A.J. Jakeman, S.H. Chen, A.E. Rizzoli, A.A. Voinov, Environmental Modelling, Software and Decision Support Vol.3 2008 Elsevier Science 1 13
34. M.M. Kaufman, D.T. Rogers, and K.S. Murray An empirical model for estimating remediation costs at contaminated sites Water Air Soil Poll. 167 2005 365 386 (Pubitemid 41502191)
35. P.K. Kitanidis, and K.F. Shen Geostatistical interpolation of chemical concentration Adv. Water Resour. 19 1996 369 378
36. I. Linkov, F.K. Satterstrom, G. Kiker, C. Batchelor, T. Bridges, and E. Ferguson From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications Environ. Int. 32 2006 1072 1093 (Pubitemid 44637296)
37. LUA B - Landesumweltamt Brandenburg Fachinformation des Landesumweltamtes (Internetpräsentation) - Nr. 5-2006: Altlastenbearbeitung in Brandenburg. Environmental Agency of the State Brandenburg 2006 www.mluw.brandenurg.de/info/ lua-publikationen Accessed October 26, 2010.
38. LUA NRW - Landesumweltamt NRW Materialien zur Altlastensanierung und zum Bodenschutz Band 20: Leistungsbuch Altlasten und Flächenentwicklung 2004/2005 2005 Environmental Agency of the State Northrhine-Westfalia (Edt.) Essen 831 pp.
39. J. Malczewski GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 20 7 2006 703 726 (Pubitemid 44559852)
40. U.S. McKnight, S.G. Funder, J.J. Rasmussen, M. Finkel, P.J. Binning, and P.L. Bjerg An integrated model for assessing the risk of TCE groundwater contamination to human receptors and surface water ecosystems Ecol. Eng. 36 9 2010 1126 1137
41. M. Morio, M. Finkel, and E. Martac Flow guided interpolation - a GIS-based method to represent contaminant concentration distributions in groundwater Environ. Modell. Softw. 25 12 2010 1769 1780
42. W. Müller, and R. Rohr-Zänker Bewertung von Nachhaltigkeitspotenzialen städtischer Brachflächen 2009 IMU Institut München, Germany 978-3-934859-27-2
43. NRTEE Cleaning up the Past, Building the Future: A National Brownfield Redevelopment Strategy for Canada. National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy 2003 Renouf Ottawa 1-894737-05-9
44. T. Prato Evaluating land use plans under uncertainty Land Use Policy 24 2007 165 174 (Pubitemid 44405391)
45. M.S. Reed, E.D.G. Fraser, and A.J. Dougill An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities Ecol. Econ. 59 2006 406 418 (Pubitemid 44345163)
46. A. Rein, P. Steffen, C. Leven, M. Bittens, and P. Dietrich Comparison of approaches for the characterization of contamination at rural megasites Environ. Earth Sci. 2010 (in press, doi: 10.1007/s12665-010-0797-7)
47. S. Sayce, J. Smith, R. Cooper, and P. Venmore-Rowland Real Estate Appraisal: From Value to Worth 2006 Blackwell Oxford
48. S. Schädler, M. Morio, S. Bartke, R. Rohr-Zänker, and M. Finkel Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model J. Environ. Manage. 92 3 2011 827 837 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.026
49. E.M. Sheard Valuation of Contaminated Land: Current Theory and Practice J. Prop. Valuat. Invest. 11 1 1993 17 27 10.1108/14635789310031388
50. D.L. Strenge, and M.A. Smith Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS): Exposure Pathway Module Description. U. S. D. O. ENERGY 2006
51. E.K.L. Tam, and P.H. Byer Remediation of contaminated lands: a decision methodology for site owners J. Environ. Manage. 64 2002 387 400 (Pubitemid 41122855)
52. L.M.L. Toms, M. Mortimer, R.K. Symons, O. Paepke, and J.F. Mueller Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in sediment by salinity and land-use type from Australia Environ. Int. 34 1 2008 58 66 (Pubitemid 350235601)
53. UBA - Umweltbundesamt Entwicklung einer Systematik zur Kostenermittlung bei der Altlastensanierung - KOSAL 1995 German Federal Environmental Agency Berlin 20/95
54. United Nations Earth Summit Agenda 21: The United Nations programme of action from Rio 1992 UN Sales Section, United Nations New York
55. USEPA Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Vol. I - Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part A. O. o. E. a. R. Response 1990 US Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati
56. USEPA Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume 1 - Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B, Development of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals) 1991 US Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati EPA/540/R-92/003
57. USEPA Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume III - Part A, Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment: 385 2001 US Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati
58. USEPA, 2002. Public Law 107-118 (H.R. 2869): "Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act". http://www.epa.gov/ brownfields/laws/sblrbra.htm. Accessed October 04, 2010.
59. USEPA, 2003. The DNAPL Remediation Challenge: Is there a case for source depletion. Expert panel on DNAPL remediation. US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati. EPA/600/R-03/143.
60. G.C. Wedding, and D. Crawford-Brown Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: a focus on sustainability and green building J. Environ. Manage. 85 2007 483 495 (Pubitemid 47264025)
61. G. Whelan, J. Buck, G. Gelston, and K. Castleton Framework for Risk Analysis in Multimedia Environmental Systems 1999 BATTELLE Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland (WA)