The Path From Passivity Toward Entrepreneurship: Public Sector Actors in Brownfield Regeneration Processes in Central and Eastern Europe

Organization and Environment

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 181-201

  Alexandrescu, Filip ^a,b   Martinát, Stanislav ^c   Klusáček, Petr ^c   Bartke, Stephan ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b Institute for Quality of Life Research (ICCV)   (Romania)

^c INSTITUTE OF GEONICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

agency; brownfield regeneration; Central and Eastern Europe; decision making; entrepreneurial path; Europeanization; institutional change; institutional entrepreneurs; Tailored Improvement of Brownfield Regeneration in Europe; TIMBRE

Indexed keywords

BROWNFIELD SITE; DECISION MAKING; ENTREPRENEUR; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EUROPEAN UNION; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; INSTITUTIONAL REFORM; PUBLIC SECTOR;

CZECH REPUBLIC; EASTERN EUROPE; POLAND; ROMANIA;

EID: 84901946360     PISSN: 10860266     EISSN: 15527417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1086026614529436     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aguilar S. C.Decision making and brownfield management.Ekonomie A Management. 2009;3:19-32.
2. AlexandrescuF. MBleicherA.BartkeS.MartinátS.KlusacekP.KrupanekJ. GǎitǎnaruD. (2013). Report on country and state level specific characteristics. Retrieved from http://www.timbre-project.eu/tl_files/timbre/Intern/4WorkPackages/WP8/Deliverables/timbre_265364_D2.2_V4.pdf.
3. AlexandrescuF. MBleicherA.WernerF.MartinátS.FrantálB.KrupanekJ. IancuI. (2012). Report on regional decision structures and key actors. Retrieved from http://www.timbre-project.eu/tl_files/timbre/Intern/4%20Work%20Packages/WP8/Deliverables/timbre_265364_D2.1_V3.pdf.
4. Andersen M. S.Ecological modernization or subversion? The effect of Europeanization on Eastern Europe.American Behavioral Scientist. 2002;45:1394-1416.
5. Andonova L. B.The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Schimmelfennig F.Sedelmeier U., ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2005:135-155.
6. Aragon-Correa J. A.Opportunities for research and future publications in Organization & Environment.Organization & Environment. 2013;26:363-364.
7. Bartke S.Valuation of market uncertainties for contaminated land.International Journal of Strategic Property Management. 2011;15:356-378.
8. Benn S.,Edwards M.,Angus-Leppan T.Organizational learning and the sustainability community of practice: The role of boundary objects.Organization & Environment. 2013;26:184-202.
9. Bernier L.,Hafsi T.The changing nature of public entrepreneurship.Public Administration Review. 2007;67:488-503.
10. Börzel T.,Buzogány A. Paper presented at the EUSA Eleventh Biennial International Conference; 2009Los Angeles, CA; 2009.
11. Börzel T.,Buzogány A.Environmental organisations and the Europeanisation of public policy in Central and Eastern Europe: The case of biodiversity governance.Environmental Politics. 2010;19:708-735.
12. Carmin J.,Vandeveer S.EU enlargement and the environment: Institutional change and environmental policy in Central and Eastern Europe. Carmin J.Vanderveer S., ed. London, England: Routledge; 2005:3-24.
13. Cohen N.Policy entrepreneurs and the design of public policy: Conceptual framework and the case of the National Health Insurance Law in Israel. Raanana: Open University of Israel, Research Institute for Policy, Political Economy and Society; 2011:.
14. Darmendrail D.Overview of the EU regulatory framework impacting contaminated land management. Paper presented at the Common Forum - NICOLE workshop; 2014Berlin, Germany; 2014.
15. Proposal from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending. Brussels, Belgium: Author; 2006:.
16. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, Belgium: Author; 2011:.
17. European Commission. (2012). Guidelines on best practice to limit, mitigate or compensate soil sealing. (SWD[2012] 101 final/2). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/soil/pdf/soil_sealing_guidelines_en.pdf.
18. Fligstein N.,McAdam D.A theory of fields. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2012:.
19. Frantál B.,Kunc J.,Nováková E.,Klusáček P.,Martinát S.,Osman R.Location Matters! Exploring Brownfields Regeneration in a Spatial Context (A Case Study of the South Moravian Region, Czech Republic).Moravian Geographical Reports. 2013;21 (2): 5-19.
20. Fraunhofer MOEZ. (2010a). Altlastenerkundungs- und -sanierungsmarkt in Mittel- und Osteuropa: Akteursanalyse für Polen. [Markets for Contaminated Land Investigation and Regeneration in Central and Eastern Europe: Analysis of Actors for Poland]. Retrieved from http://www.ufz.de/export/data/38/34547_10_04_09_Akteursanalyse_PL.pdf.
21. Fraunhofer MOEZ. (2010b). Altlastenerkundungs- und -sanierungsmarkt in Mittel- und Osteuropa: Akteursanalyse für Rumänien. [Markets for Contaminated Land Investigation and Regeneration in Central and Eastern Europe: Analysis of Actors for Romania]. Retrieved from http://www.ufz.de/export/data/38/34548_10_04_09_Akteursanalyse_RO.pdf.
22. Garud R.,Hardy C.,Maguire S.Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue.Organization Studies. 2007;28:957-969.
23. Garud R.,Karnøe P.Path dependence and creation. Garud R.Karnøe P., ed. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000:1-38.
24. Glaser B. G.,Strauss A. L.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967:.
25. Garb Y.,Jackson J.Brownfields in the Czech Republic 1989-2009: The long path to integrated land management.Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal. 2010;3:263-276.
26. Goffman E.Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1974:.
27. Grabher G.Learning in projects, remembering in networks? Communality, sociality, and connectivity in project ecologies.European Urban and Regional Studies. 2004;11:103-123.
28. Henneberry J.,Parris S.The embedded developer: Using project ecologies to analyze local property development networks.Town Planning Review. 2013;84:227-249.
29. Klusáček P.,Krejčí T.,Martinát S.,Kunc J.,Osman R.,Frantál B.Regeneration of agricultural brownfields in the Czech Republic: Case study of the South Moravian Region.Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 2013;2:549-561.
30. KnillC.LehmkuhlD. (1999). How Europe matters: Different mechanisms of Europeanization. European Integration online Papers, 3(7). Retrieved from http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-007a.htm.
31. Krzysztofik R.,Kantor-Pietraga I.,Spórna T.A Dynamic Approach to the Typology of Functional Derelict Areas (Sosnowiec, Poland).Moravian Geographical Reports. 2013;21 (2): 20-35.
32. Leidel M.,Niemann S.,Hagemann N.Capacity development as key factor for integrated water resources management (IWRM): Improving water management in the Western Bug River Basin, Ukraine.Environmental Earth Sciences. 2012;65:1415-1426.
33. Maguire S.,Hardy C.,Lawrence T B.Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada.Academy of Management Journal. 2004;47:657-679.
34. Mintrom M.,Norman P.Policy entrepreneurship and policy change.Policy Studies Journal. 2009;37:649-667.
35. North D.Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
36. OliverL.FerberU.GrimskiD.MillarK.NathanailP. (2005). The scale and nature of European brownfields. Retrieved from www.cabernet.org.uk/resourcefs/417.pdf.
37. Pavlínek P.,Pickles J.Environmental pasts/environmental futures in post-socialist Europe.Environmental Politics. 2004;13:237-265.
38. Parau C. E.Impaling Dracula: How EU accession empowered civil society in Romania.West European Politics. 2009;32:119-141.
39. Perkins T. E.Women's pathways into activism: Rethinking the women's environmental justice narrative in California's San Joaquin Valley.Organization & Environment. 2012;25:76-94.
40. Polsby N. W.Political innovation in America: The politics of policy initiation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1984:.
41. Roberts N.,King P.Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1991;1:147-175.
42. Schädler S.,Morio M.,Bartke S.,Finkel M.Integrated planning and spatial evaluation of megasite remediation and reuse options.Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 2012;124 (1-4): 88-100.
43. Schimmelfennig F.,Sedelmeier U.The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Schimmelfennig F.Sedelmeier U., ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2005:1-28.
44. Shrivastava P.,Kennelly J. J.Sustainability and place-based enterprise.Organization & Environment. 2013;26:83-101.
45. Stenning A.Placing (post-)socialism: The making and remaking of Nowa Huta, Poland.European Urban and Regional Studies. 2000;7 (2): 99-118.
46. Zollo M.,Cennamo C.,Neumann K.Beyond what and why: Understanding organizational evolution toward sustainable enterprise models.Organization & Environment. 2013;26:241-259.