Valuation of Market uncertainties for contaminated land;Rinkos netikrumo vertinimas užterštų sklypų atveju

International Journal of Strategic Property Management

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 356-378

  Bartke, Stephan ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contaminated land; Real estate appraisal; Risk scoring method; Stigma and marketability risk; Valuation of perceived uncertainties

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865616046     PISSN: 1648715X     EISSN: 16489179     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1648715X.2011.633771     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Adair, A., Lim, L. C., Crosby, N. and Watkins, C. (2001) An emerging European valuation research agenda: evidence from the European Real Estate Society and the RICS Cutting Edge conferences, paper presented at TEGoVA conference, 1 November 2001, Berlin. Available at: http://www.tegova.org/data/bin/4912f81fc63d8_esreport.pdf [accessed 12 April 2010]
2. Adams, C. D., Baum, A. E. and MacGregor, B. D. (1985) The influence of valuation practices upon the price of vacant inner city land, Journal of Property Research, 2(3), pp. 157-173. doi:10.1080/02640828508723891
3. Appraisal Foundation (2008) Uniform standards of professional appraisal practice (2008-2009 edition USPAP + Guidance), The Appraisal Foundation, Washington, DC.
4. th edition. The Appraisal Institute, Chicago, IL.
5. Bartke, S. (2010) Appraisal of uncertainties in contaminated land market value assessment. In: Chemicals in the environment conference, Leipzig, Germany, 23 March 2010. Available at: http://www.ufz.de/data/Bartke%20CITE%20201013385.pdf [accessed 30 July 2010]
6. Beattie, R. (1990) City Grant, Journal of Property Finance, 1(4), pp. 588-592. doi:10.1108/09588689010032911
7. Bell, R. (2003) Valuation of contaminated property, BNA's Environmental due diligence guide, No. 133 3-03, §111, pp. 1501-1510.
8. nd edition. The Appraisal Institute, Chicago, IL.
9. Bond, S. G. and Kennedy, P. J. (2000) The valuation of contaminated land - Methods adopted in the UK and NZ, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 18(2), pp. 254-271. doi:10.1108/14635780010324781
10. Bond, S. G., Kinnard Jr., W., Kennedy, P. J. and Worzala, E. M. (2001) An international perspective on incorporating risk in the valuation of contaminated land, The Appraisal Journal, 69(3), pp. 258-265.
11. Boyle, K. J., Kuminoff, N. V., Zhang, C., Devanney, M. and Bell, K. P. (2010) Does a property-specific environmental health risk create a "neighborhood" housing price stigma? Arsenic in private well water, Water Resources Research, 46, W03507, 10 p. doi:10.1029/2009WR008074
12. Chalmers, J. A. and Roehr, S. A. (1993) Issues in the valuation of contaminated properties, The Appraisal Journal, 61(1), pp. 28-40.
13. Chalmers, J. A. and Jackson, T. O. (1996) Risk factors in the appraisal of contaminated properties, The Appraisal Journal, 64(1), pp. 44-58.
14. Chan, N. (2009) Reassessing the valuation of contaminated land in Australia, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 15(2), pp. 166-181.
15. Crocoll, R., Lehmann, J., Stegmüller, V. and Schroth, T. (2007) Altlasten im Grundstücksverkehr: Wertermittlung kontaminierter Flächen [Brownfields and the property market: valuation of contaminated sites], wlb (Supplement TerraTech), 51(10), pp. TT6-TT9. (In German)
16. Dale, L., Murdoch, J. C., Thayer, M. A. and Waddell, P. A. (1999) Do property values re-bound from environmental stigmas? Evidence from Dallas, Land Economics, 75(2), pp. 311-326. doi:10.2307/3147013
17. Dasgupta, S. and Tam, E. K. L. (2009) A comprehensive review of existing classification systems of brownfield sites, Environmental Practice, 11(4), pp. 285-300. doi:10.1017/S1466046609990287
18. Dotzour, M. (1997) Groundwater contamination and residual property values, The Appraisal Journal, 65(3), pp. 279-285.
19. Frey, J. and Roddewig, R. J. (2006) Testing the reliability of continguent valuation in the real estate marketplace, The Appraisal Journal, 74(3), pp. 267-280.
20. Gamble, H. B. and Downing, R. H. (1982) Effects of nuclear power plants on residential property values, Journal of Regional Science, 22(4), pp. 457-478. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.1982.tb00770.x
21. Greenberg, M. and Huges, J. (1993) Impact of hazardous waste sitse on property value and landuse: tax assessors' appraisal, The Appraisal Journal, 61(1), pp. 42-51.
22. Großmann, J., Hilse, H. and Lauerwald, U. (2001) Wertermittlung altlastenbehafteter Grundstücke in der Praxis [Valuation of contaminated land in practice], TerraTech, 10(4), pp. 41-46. (In German)
23. Guntermann, K. L. (1995) Sanitary landfills, stigma and industrial land values, Journal of Real Estate Research, 10(5), pp. 531-542.
24. Hilse, H. and Bischoff, B. (2005) Konsequenzen bei der Wertermittlung belasteter Grundstücke als wichtiges Element der Flächenentwicklung [Consequences for the valuation of contaminated land as a major component of land development]. In: ITVA and AAV (Eds.) Altlastensymposium 2005 [Symposium on contaminated sites], ITVA, pp. 81-93. (In German)
25. Hurd, B. H. (2002) Valuing superfund site cleanup: evidence of recovering stigmatized property values, The Appraisal Journal, 70(4), pp. 426-437.
26. th edition. International Valuation Standards Council - IVSC, N.P., ISBN 978-0922154944.
27. Jackson, T. O. (2001a) The effects of environmental contamination on real estate: a literature review, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 9(2), pp. 93-116.
28. Jackson, T. O. (2001b) The effect of previous environmental contamination on industrial real estate prices, The Appraisal Journal, 69(2), pp. 200-210.
29. Jackson, T. O. (2002) Environmental contamination and industrial real estate prices, Journal of Real Estate Research, 23(1/2), pp. 179-199.
30. Jackson, T. O. (2003a) Appraisal standards and contaminated property valuation, The Appraisal Journal, 71(2), pp. 127-133.
31. Jackson, T. O. (2003b) Methods and techniques for contaminated property valuation, The Appraisal Journal, 71(4), pp. 311-320.
32. Jackson, T. O. (2004a) Case studies analysis: environmental stigma and monitored natural attenuation, The Appraisal Journal, 72(2), pp. 111-118.
33. Jackson, T. O. (2004b) Surveys, market interviews and environmental stigma, The Appraisal Journal, 72(4), pp. 300-310.
34. Jackson, T. O. (2005) Groundwater contamination and real estate investment risk, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 8(1), pp. 115-131.
35. Jackson, T. O. (2010) Real property valuation issues in environmental class actions, The Appraisal Journal, 78(2), pp. 141-149.
36. nd ed., 11232, C. F. Müller, Heidelberg. (In German)
37. Kinnard, W. N., Worzala, E. M., Bond, S. G. and Kennedy, P. J. (2002) Comparative studies of United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand appraisal practice: valuing contaminated commercial real estate. In: Wang, K. and Wolverton, M. L. (eds.), Real estate valuation theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0909-7_10
38. th edition. Bundesanzeiger, Cologne. (In German)
39. Kohlhase, J. E. (1991) The impact of toxic waste sites on housing values, Journal of Urban Economics, 30(1), pp. 1-26. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(91)90042-6
40. Lentz, G. H. and Tse, K. S. M. (1995) An option pricing approach to the valuation of real estate conataminated with hazardous materials, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 10(2), pp. 121-144. doi:10.1007/BF01096985.
41. Litman, T. (1995) Land use impact costs of transportation, World Transport Policy and Practice, 1(4), pp. 9-16. doi:10.1108/13527619510101981
42. Longo, A. and Alberini, A. (2005) What are the effects of contamination risks on commercial and industrial properties? Evidence from Baltimore, Maryland, FEEM-Working Paper No. 111.2005, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.
43. McClelland, G. H., Schulze, W. D. and Hurd, B. H. (1990) The effect of risk beliefs on property values: a case study of a hazardous waste site, Risk Analysis, 10(4), pp. 485-497. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00534.x
44. McLean, D. and Mundy, B. (1998a) The addition of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis to the required body of knowledge for the estimation of environmental damages, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 1(1), pp. 1-19.
45. McLean, D. and Mundy, B. (1998b) Using the contingent value approach for natural resource and environmental damage, The Appraisal Journal, 66(3), pp. 290-297.
46. Messer, K. D., Schulze, W. D., Hackett, K. F., Cameron, T. A. and McClelland, G. H. (2006) Can stigma explain large property value losses? The psychology and economics of superfund, Environmental and Resource Economics, 33(3), 299-324. doi:10.1007/s10640-005-3609-x
47. Moser, G. (2009) Bewertung und Verwertung kontaminierter Industrie- und Gewerbeliegenschaften [Valuation and utilisation of contaminated industrial and commercial real estate], Master thesis, Donau Universität Krems. (In German)
48. Mundy, B. (1992a) Stigma and value, The Appraisal Journal, 60(1), pp. 7-13.
49. Mundy, B. (1992b) The impact of hazardous materials on Property Value, The Appraisal Journal, 60(2), pp. 155-162.
50. Norrman, J. (2001) Decision analysis under risk and uncertainty at contaminated sites - A literature review, Swedish Geotechnical Institute, SGI Varia 501, SGI, Linköping, ISSN: 1100-6692.
51. NRC (2005) Contaminants in the subsurface: Source zone assessment and remediation, National Research Concil - NRC, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., ISBN: 0 309 09447 X.
52. Page, G. W. and Rabinowitz, H. (1993) Groundwater contamination: its effects on property values and cities, Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), pp. 473-481. doi:10.1080/01944369308975901
53. Patchin, P. J. (1988) Valuation of contaminated properties, The Appraisal Journal, 56(1), pp. 7-16.
54. Patchin, P. J. (1991) Contaminated properties - stigma revisited, The Appraisal Journal, 59(2), pp. 167-172.
55. Patchin, P. J. (1994) Contaminated properties and the sales comparison approach, The Appraisal Journal, 62(3), pp. 402-409.
56. Reichert, A. K., Small, M. and Mohanty, S. (1992) The impact of landfills on residential property values, Journal of Real Estate Research, 7(3), pp. 297-314.
57. Richards, T. O. (1997) Is it worth the risk? The impact of environmental risk on property investment valuation, Research Report 1997/1, College of Estate Management, Reading.
58. th edition. RICS Books, Coventry, UK.
59. Roddewig, R. (1996) Stigma, environmental risk and property value: 10 critical inquiries, The Appraisal Journal, 64(4), pp. 375-387.
60. Schaedler, S., Morio, M., Bartke, S. and Finkel, M. Integrated planning and spatial evaluation of megasite remediation and reuse options, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, In Press, doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2011.03.003.
61. Schaedler, S., Morio, M., Bartke, S., Rohr-Zänker, R. and Finkel, M. (2011) Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model, Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), pp. 827-837. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.026
62. Sheard, E. M. (1992) Valuation of contaminated land: current theory and practice, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 11(1), pp. 17-27. doi:10.1108/14635789310031388
63. Shelem, I., Lavee, D. and Becker, N. Contamination by the Israeli military industry and its impact on apartment sale prices in an adjacent Tel Aviv neighborhood: a hedonic pricing model study, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, In Press, doi:10.1080/19463138.2011.552942.
64. Siemens, H. (2003) Stigma of contaminated land: difficult to tackle, The Appraisal Journal, 71(2), pp. 121-126.
65. Simons, A. R. and Winson-Geideman, K. (2005) Determining market perceptions on contamination of residential property buyers using contingent valuation surveys, Journal of Real Estate Research, 27(2), pp. 193-220.
66. Simons, R. A. and Saginor, J. (2010) Determining off-site damages to non-residential property from leaking underground storage tanks using Contingent Valuation analysis, International Real Estate Review, 13(2), pp. 134-156.
67. Simons, R. A. and Sementelli, A. (2006) When bad things happen to good property, Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC.
68. Simons, R. A. and Sementelli, A. (1997) Liquidity loss and delayed transactions with leaking underground storage tanks, The Appraisal Journal, 65(3), pp. 255-260.
69. Slovic, P., Layman, M., Kraus, N., Flynn, J., Chalmers, J. and Gesell, G. (1991) Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada, Risk Analysis, 11(4), pp. 683-696. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00658.x
70. Slutzky, D. and Frey, A. J. (2010) Brownfields uncertainty: a proposal to reform superfund, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 12(3), pp. 85-100.
71. Syms, P. M. (1997) Contaminated land: the practice and economics of redevelopment. Blackwell Science Limited, Oxford.
72. nd edition. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
73. Syms, P. M. and Weber, B. R. (2003) International approaches to the valuation of land and property affected by contamination. RICS Foundation Research Review Series, August 2003, RICS Foundation, London.
74. th edition. ISBN 978-90-9024138-8.
75. TEGoVA (2003) European property and market rating: a valuer's guide, The European Group of Valuers' Associations, London.
76. Thayer, M., Albers, H. and Rahmatian, M. (1992) The benefits of reducing exposure to waste disposal sites: a hedonic housing value approach, Journal of Real Estate Research, 7(3), pp. 265-282.
77. Tonin, S. (2006) What is the value of brownfields? A review of possible approaches. In: Alberini, A., Rosato P. and Turvani, M. (eds.), Valuing complex natural resource systems: the case of the Lagoon of Venice, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.
78. Wang, Q., Hipel, K. W. and Kilgour, D. M. (2009) Fuzzy real options in brownfield redevelopment evaluation, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 2009, pp. 1-17. doi:10.1155/2009/817137.
79. Weber, B. R. (1997) The valuation of contaminated land, Journal of Real Estate Research, 14(3), pp. 379-398.
80. Weber, B. R., Adair, A. and McGreal, S. (2008) Solutions to the five key brownfield valuation problems, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 26(1), pp. 8-37. doi:10.1108/14635780810845145
81. Woestmann, U., Kiel, M. and Pietras, C. -P. (2011) Ermittlung der Verkehrswerte von kontaminierten Grundstücken im Treuhandnachfolgebereich nach der neuen Immobilienwertermittlungsverordnung [Determination of the market value of contaminated areas in succession of the German Treuhandanstalt according to the new German ordinance on the valuation of property/real estate], Altlastenspektrum, 20(2), pp. 62-71. (In German)
82. Wilson, A. R. (2006) Contigent valuation: not an appropriate valuation tool, The Appraisal Journal, 74(1), pp. 53-61.
83. Wilson, A. R. (1996) Emerging approaches to impaired property valuation, The Appraisal Journal, 64(2), pp. 155-170.
84. Wiltshaw, D. G. (1998) Stigma, perception and the remediation of contaminated land, Journal of Property Research, 15(4), pp. 285-303. doi:10.1080/095999198368301