Factors affecting brownfield regeneration in post-socialist space: The case of the Czech Republic

Land Use Policy

Volumn 48, Issue , 2015, Pages 309-316

  Osman, Robert ^a   Frantál, Bohumil ^a   Klusáček, Petr ^a   Kunc, Josef ^a   Martinát, Stanislav ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEONICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Brownfields; Czech Republic; Land use management; Post socialist space; Success factors; Urban renewal

Indexed keywords

BROWNFIELD SITE; LAND USE PLANNING; PUBLIC SPACE; URBAN RENEWAL;

CZECH REPUBLIC;

EID: 84934966961     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adair A.S., Berry J.N., McGreal W.S., Quinn A. Factors Affecting the Level and Form of Private Investment in Regeneration. Report to Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. [online] 2002, University of Ulster, London, 83 pp. Available at: http://www.rpp.ulster.ac.uk/reports/odpm_report.pdf.
2. Alberini A., Longo A., Tonin S., Trombetta F., Turvani M. The role of liability, regulation and economic incentives in brownfield remediation and redevelopment: evidence from surveys of developers. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2005, 35(4):327-351.
3. Alker S., Joy V., Roberts P., Smith N. The definition of brownfield. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 2000, 43(1):49-69.
4. Bacot H., O'Dell C. Establishing indicators to evaluate brownfield redevelopment. Econ. Dev. Q. 2006, 20(2):142-161.
5. Berki M. Post-1990 urban brownfield regeneration in central and eastern europe: a theoretical concept. Development of the Settlement Network in the Central European Countries 2012, 137-144. Springer, Berlin. T. Csapó, A. Balogh (Eds.).
6. Bjelland M. Until justice and stewardship embrace: or, how a geographer thinks about brownfield sites. Christian Scholar's Rev. 2002, 31(4):393-412.
7. Cheng F., Geertman S., Kuffer M., Zhan Q. An integrative methodology to improve brownfield redevelopment planning in Chinese cities: a case study of Futian, Shenzhen. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2011, 35(5):388-398.
8. Cobârzan B. Brownfield redevelopment in Romania. Transylv. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2007, 21(5):28-46.
9. Coffin S.L., Shepherd A. Barriers to brownfield redevelopment: lessons learned from two great lakes states. Public Works Manage. Policy 1998, 2(3):258-266.
10. CzechInvest, 2007. Research Study for the Location of Brownfields. [online] Ministry of Industry and Trade. Available at: . http://www.brownfieldy.org/about-project/#research-study.
11. CzechInvest, 2008. National Strategy for Brownfields Regeneration of the Czech Republic [online] Ministry of Industry and Trade. Available at: . http://www.czechinvest.org/data/files/strategie-regenerace-vlada-1079.pdf.
12. De Sousa C.A. Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield development: a private sector perspective on the costs and risks associated with brownfield redevelopment in the Greater Toronto Area. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 2000, 43(6):831-853.
13. De Sousa C.A. The greening of brownfields in American cities. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 2004, 47(4):579-600.
14. Dixon T. The property development industry and sustainable urban brownfield regeneration in England: an analysis of case studies in Thames Gateway and Greater Manchester. Urban Stud. 2007, 44(12):2379-2400.
15. Dixon T., Otsuka N., Abe H. Critical success factors in urban brownfield regeneration: an analysis of 'hardcore' sites in Manchester and Osaka during the economic recession (2009-10). Environ. Plann. A 2011, 43(4):961-980.
16. Frantál B., Kunc J., Nováková E., Klusáček P., Martinát S., Osman R. Location matters! Exploring brownfields regeneration in a spatial context (case study of the South Moravian Region, Czech Republic). Morav. Geogr. Rep. 2013, 21(2):5-19.
17. Frantál, B., Klusáček, P., Kunc, J., Martinát, S., 2012. Report on results of survey on brownfield regeneration and statistical analysis, Deliverable D3.1 of the TIMBRE project. [online] Available at: . http://www.andrea-kubitz.de/timbre/tl_files/timbre/Intern/4%20Work%20Packages/WP8/Deliverables/timbre_265364_D3.1_V3.pdf.
18. Giddens A. The Consequences Of Modernity 1991, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 188 pp.
19. Gregory D. Geographical Imaginations 1994, Wiley-Blackwell, Cambridge, 456 pp.
20. Harvey D. The Condition of Postmodernity 1989, Blackwell, Oxford, 378 pp.
21. Hercik J., Šerý O., Toušek V. Post- military areas in the Czech Republic and their revitalization - examples of the towns of Hodonín and Uherské Hradiště. Acta Univ. Palack. Olomuc.-Geogr. 2011, 42(2):107-119.
22. Hercik J., Šimáček P., Szczyrba Z., Smolová I. Military brownfields in the Czech Republic and the potential for their revitalisation, focused on their residential function. Quaestiones Geogr. 2014, 33(2):127-138.
23. Hercik J., Toušek V., Šerý O. La conversione dei siti militari nella Repubblica Ceca: i casi di Hodonín e Uherské Hradiste (The conversion of military sites in the Czech Republic: Hodonín and Uherské Hradist). Territorio 2012, 62:43-48.
24. Klusáček P., Krejčí T., Martinát S., Kunc J., Osman R., Frantál B. Regeneration of agricultural brownfields in the Czech Republic - case study of the South Moravian Region. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvicult. Mendel. Brunensis 2013, 61(2):549-561.
25. Kunc J., Navrátil J., Tonev P., Frantál B., Klusáček P., Martinát S., Havlíček M., Černík J. Perception of urban renewal: reflexions and coherences of socio-spatial patterns (Brno, Czech Republic). Geogr. Tech. 2014, 9(1):66-77.
26. Lange D., McNeil S. Clean it and they will come? Defining successful brownfield development. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 2004, 130(2):101-108.
27. Lefebvre H. The Production Of Space 1991, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 454 pp.
28. Letang S.J., Taylor R. Community perception of redevelopment changes and its impact on brownfields redevelopment success. OIDA Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 5(11):21-42.
29. Longo A., Campbell D. What are the determinants of brownfields regeneration? An analysis of brownfields in England. Proceedings of the Conference on the Science and Education of Land Use: A Transatlantic, Multidisciplinary and Comparative Approach 2007, Available at: http://nercrd.psu.edu/taluc/Papers/LongoWhat.pdf.
30. Loures L. Post- industrial landscapes as drivers for urban redevelopment: public versus expert perspectives towards the benefits and barriers of the reuse of post-industrial sites in urban areas. Habitat Int. 2015, 45(2):72-81.
31. Matlovič R., Ira V., Sýkora L., Szczyrba Z. Procesy transformacyjne struktury przestrzennej miast postkomunistycznych (na przykładzie Pragi, Bratysławy, Ołomuńca oraz Preszowa). Miasto postsocjalistyczne - organizacja przestrzeni miejskiej i jej przemiany(II), XIV Konwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście 2001, 9-21. Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź. I. Jaz˙dzewska (Ed.).
32. McCarthy L. The brownfield dual land-use policy challenge: reducing barriers to private redevelopment while connecting reuse to broader community goals. Land Use Policy 2002, 19(4):287-296.
33. Myant M. Transforming the Czech and Slovak economies: evidence at the district level. Reg. Stud. 1995, 29(8):753-760.
34. Myant M., Smith S. Regional development and post-communist politics in a Czech region. Eur.-Asia Stud. 2006, 58(2):147-168.
35. Nijkamp P., Rodenburg C.A., Wagtendonk A.J. Success factors for sustainable urban brownfield development: a comparative case study approach to polluted sites. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 40(2):235-252.
36. Novosák J., Hájek O., Nekolová J., Bednář P. SPatial pattern of brownfields and characteristics of redeveloped sites in the Ostrava Metropolitan Area (Czech Republic). Morav. Geogr. Rep. 2013, 21(2):36-45.
37. Oliver L., Ferber U., Grimski D., Millar K., Nathanail P. The scale and nature of European brownfields. CABERNET 2005 - International Conference on Managing Urban Land LQM Ltd. 2005, [online] Available at: http://www.cabernet.org.uk/resourcefs/417pdf.
38. Otsuka N., Dixon T., Abe H. Stock measurement and regeneration policy approaches to hardcore brownfield sites: England and Japan compared. Land Use Policy 2013, 33:36-41.
39. Skála J., Vácha R., Čechmánková J., Horváthová V. VArious aspects of the genesis and perspectives on agricultural brownfields in the Czech Republic. Morav. Geogr. Rep. 2013, 21(2):46-55.
40. Soja E.W. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places 1996, Blackwell, Malden, 334 pp.
41. Soja E.W. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory 2011, Verso, London, 228 pp.
42. Sýkora L., Bouzarovski S. Multiple transformations: conceptualising the post-communist urban transition. Urban Stud. 2012, 49(1):43-60.
43. Szczyrba Z. Development of retail geographical structure in the Czech Republic: a contribution to the study of urban environment changes. Acta Univ. Palack. Olomuc.-Geogr. 2010, 41(2):5-20.
44. Tölle A. Report about Concepts and Tools for Brownfield Redevelopment Activities (Output No. 3.1.1 of the COBRAMAN project) 2009, Bydgoszcz, Poland, [online] Available at: http://www.central2013eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/outputlib/cobraman_tools_brownfield_regeneration.pdf.
45. Warf B., Arias S. The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives 2008, Routledge, New York, 232 pp.
46. World Bank, 'World Bank Open Data per Countries', 2014, [Online] available at , accessed on November 15, 2014. http://data.worldbank.org/.