Integrating ecosystem services and disservices: insights from plant invasions

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 23, Issue , 2017, Pages 94-107

  Vaz, Ana S ^a,b   Kueffer, Christoph ^c,d   Kull, Christian A ^e,f   Richardson, David M ^d   Vicente, Joana R ^a,g   Kühn, Ingolf ^h,i,j   Schröter, Matthias ^h,j   Hauck, Jennifer ^h,k   Bonn, Aletta ^h,j,l   Honrado, João P ^a,b  

^a CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^f MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS OS MONTES AND ALTO DOURO   (Portugal)

^h HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

ⁱ MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^j GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH IDIV HALLE JENA LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^k UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research ^*  (Germany)

^l FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

Biological invasions; Ecosystem function; Human valuation; Invasive species; Social ecological management

Indexed keywords

EID: 85002542652     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.017     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Agarwala, M., Atkinson, G., Fry, B.P., Homewood, K., Mourato, S., Rowcliffe, J.M., Wallace, G., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Assessing the relationship between human well-being and ecosystem services: a review of frameworks. Conserv. Soc. 12 (2014), 437–449.
2. Agbenyega, O., Burgess, P.J., Cook, M., Morris, J., Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy 26 (2009), 551–557.
3. Ango, T.G., Börjeson, L., Senbeta, F., Hylander, K., Balancing ecosystem services and disservices: smallholder farmers’ use and management of forest and trees in an agricultural landscape in southwestern Ethiopia. Ecol. Soc., 19, 2014, 30.
4. Bach, T.M., Larson, B.M.H., in press. Speaking about weeds: Indigenous elders' metaphors for invasive species and their management. Environmental Values. 〈http://www.whpress.co.uk/EV/papers/Bach.pdf〉.
5. Baró, F., Chaparro, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Langemeyer, J., Nowak, D.J., Terradas, J., Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: the case of urban forests in Barcelona, Spain. AMBIO 43 (2014), 466–479.
6. Bennett, L.T., Mele, P.M., Annett, S., Kasel, S., Examining links between soil management, soil health, and public benefits in agricultural landscapes: an Australian perspective. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 139 (2010), 1–12.
7. Biggs, R., Schluter, M., Biggs, D., Bohensky, E.L., BurnSilver, S., Cundill, G., Dakos, V., Daw, T.M., Evans, L.S., Kotschy, K., Leitch, A.M., Meek, C., Quinlan, A., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Robards, M.D., Schoon, M.L., Schultz, L., West, P.C., Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37 (2012), 421–448.
8. Bonn, A., Allott, T., Evans, M., Joosten, H., Stoneman, R., 2016. Peatland restoration and ecosystem services: science, policy and practice. In: Ecological Reviews, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Brown, K., Westaway, E., Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Ann. Rev. Environ. Res. 36 (2011), 321–342.
10. Brundu, G., Richardson, D.M., Planted forests and invasive alien trees in Europe: a code for managing existing and future plantings to mitigate the risk of negative impacts from invasions. NeoBiota 30 (2016), 5–47.
11. Carruthers, J., Robin, L., Hattingh, J.P., Kull, C.A., Rangan, H., van Wilgen, B.W., A native at home and abroad: the history, politics, ethics and aesthetics of acacias. Divers. Distrib. 17 (2011), 810–821.
12. Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T., Goldstein, J., Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 74 (2012), 8–18.
13. Cumming, G.S., Buerkert, A., Hoffmann, E.M., Schlecht, E., von Cramon-Taubadel, S., Tscharntke, T., Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services. Nature 515 (2014), 50–57.
14. de Wit, M.P., Crookes, D.J., van Wilgen, B.W., Conflicts of interest in environmental management: estimating the costs and benefits of a tree invasion. Biol. Invasions 3 (2001), 167–178.
15. Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Touza, J., Perrings, C., Williamson, M., The horticultural trade and ornamental plant invasions in Britain. Conserv. Biol. 21 (2007), 224–231.
16. Dickie, I., Bennett, B., Burrows, L., Nuñez, M., Peltzer, D., Porté, A., Richardson, D.M., Rejmánek, M., Rundel, P., van Wilgen, B., Conflicting values: ecosystem services and invasive tree management. Biol. Invasions 16 (2014), 705–719.
17. Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, C., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J.R., Arico, S., Báldi, et al. The IPBES Conceptual framework – connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14 (2015), 1–16.
18. Dobbs, C., Kendal, D., Nitschke, C.R., Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and socio demographics. Ecol. Indic. 43 (2014), 44–55.
19. Escobedo, F.J., Kroeger, T., Wagner, J.E., Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ. Pollut. 159 (2011), 2078–2087.
20. Eviner, V.T., Garbach, K., Baty, J.H., Hoskinson, S.A., Measuring the effects of invasive plants on ecosystem services: challenges and prospects. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 5 (2012), 125–136.
21. Fenesi, A., Vágási, C.I., Beldean, M., Földesi, R., Kolcsár, L.-P., Shapiro, J.T., Török, E., Kovács-Hostyánszki, A., Solidago canadensis impacts on native plant and pollinator communities in different-aged old fields. Basic Appl. Ecol. 16 (2015), 335–346.
22. Funk, J.L., Matzek, V., Bernhardt, M., Johnson, D., Broadening the case for invasive species management to include impacts on ecosystem services. BioScience 64 (2013), 58–63.
23. Gaertner, M., Larson, B.M.H., Irlich, U.M., Holmes, P.M., Stafford, L., van Wilgen, B.W., Richardson, D.M., Managing invasive species in cities: a framework from Cape Town, South Africa. Landsc. Urban Plan 151 (2016), 1–9.
24. Gaertner, M., Biggs, R., Te Beest, M., Hui, C., Molofsky, J., Richardson, D.M., Invasive plants as drivers of regime shifts: identifying high-priority invaders that alter feedback relationships. Divers. Distrib. 20 (2014), 733–744.
25. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Barton, D.N., Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86 (2013), 235–245.
26. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Raffaelli, D.G., Frid, C.L.J., (eds.) Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis, 2010, Cambridge University Press, UK, 110–139.
27. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2013. Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES): consultation on version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework contract No EEA/IEA/09/003.
28. Higgins, J.P., Green, S., 2011. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. 〈http://handbook.cochrane.org〉 (accessed 01.08.16).
29. Humair, F., Edwards, P.J., Siegrist, M., Kueffer, C., Understanding misunderstandings in invasion science: why experts don't agree on common concepts and risk assessments. Neobiota 20 (2014), 1–30.
30. Jax, K., Heink, U., 2015. Human well-being, In: Potschin, M., Jax, K. (Eds), OpenNESS Ecosystem Service Reference Book. EC FP7 Grant Agreement no. 308428. 〈http://www.openness-project.eu/sites/default/files/SP_HWB.pdf〉 (accessed 15.07.16).
31. Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Pauleit, S., Naumann, S., Davis, M., Artmann, M., Haase, D., Knapp, S., Korn, H., Stadler, J., Zaunberger, K., Bonn, A., Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecol. Soc., 21, 2016, 39.
32. Kingston, T., Cute, creepy, or crispy – how values, attitudes and norms shape human behavior toward bats. Voigt, C.C., Kingston, T., (eds.) Bats of the Anthropocene, 2015, Springer International AG, 571–595.
33. Koskela, J., Vinceti, B., Dvorak, W., Bush, D., Dawson, I.K., Loo, J., Kjaer, E.D., Navarro, C., Padolina, C., Bordács, S., Jamnadass, R., Graudal, L., Ramamonjisoa, L., Utilization and transfer of forest genetic resources: a global review. For. Ecol. Manag. 333 (2014), 22–34.
34. Kronenberg, J., What can the current debate on ecosystem services learn from the past? Lessons from economic ornithology. Geoforum 55 (2014), 164–177.
35. Kueffer, C., Hirsch Hadorn, G., How to achieve effectiveness in problem-oriented landscape research – the example of research on biotic invasions. Liv. Rev. Landsc. Res., 2008, (2-2).
36. Kueffer, C., Integrating natural and social sciences for understanding and managing plant invasions. Larrue, S., (eds.) Biodiversity and Societies in the Pacific Islands, 2013, Presses Universitaires de Provence, Collection “Confluent des Sciences” & ANU ePress, Marseilles & Canberra, 71–96.
37. Kueffer, C., Pysek, P., Richardson, D., Integrative invasion science: model organisms, multi-site studies, unbiased meta-analysis, and invasion syndromes. New Phytol. 200 (2013), 615–633.
38. Kueffer, C., Kull, C., Non-native species and the aesthetics of nature. Hulme, P., Vilà, M., Ruiz, G., (eds.) Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services, 2017, Springer, Berlin (In press) http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319451190.
39. Kull, C.A., Shackleton, C.M., Cunningham, P.J., Ducatillon, C., Dufour-Dror, J.-M., Esler, K.J., Friday, J.B., Gouveia, A.C., Griffin, A.R., Marchante, E., Midgley, S.J., Pauchard, A., Rangan, H., Richardson, D.M., Rinaudo, T., Tassin, J., Urgenson, L.S., von Maltitz, G.P., Zenni, R.D., Zylstra, M.J., Adoption, use and perception of Australian acacias around the world. Divers. Distrib. 17 (2011), 822–836.
40. Le Maitre, D.C., Gaertner, M., Marchante, E., Ens, E.-J., Holmes, P.M., Pauchard, A., O'Farrell, P.J., Rogers, A.M., Blanchard, R., Blignaut, J., Richardson, D.M., Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration. Divers. Distrib. 17 (2011), 1015–1029.
41. Limburg, K.E., Luzadis, V.A., Ramsey, M., Schulz, K.L., Mayer, C.M., The good, the bad, and the algae: perceiving ecosystem services and disservices generated by zebra and quagga mussels. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 36 (2010), 86–92.
42. Lyytimäki, J., Bad nature: newspaper representations of ecosystem disservices. Urban For. Urban Green. 13 (2014), 418–424.
43. Lyytimäki, J., Petersen, L.K., Normander, B., Bezák, P., Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle. Environ. Sci. 5 (2008), 161–172.
44. Lyytimäki, J., Sipilä, M., Hopping on one leg – the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For. Urban Green. 8 (2009), 309–315.
45. Ma, F., Eneji, A.E., Liu, J., Assessment of ecosystem services and dis-services of an agro-ecosystem based on extended energy framework: a case study of Luancheng County, North China. Ecol. Eng. 82 (2015), 241–251.
46. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
47. MAES, 2013. Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Discussion paper. European Union.
48. Marchante, E., Marchante, H., Morais, M.C., Freitas, H., 2010. Combining methodologies to increase public awareness about invasive plants in Portugal. In: II International Workshop on Invasive Plants In Mediterranean Type Regions of The World, Conference paper. Trabzon, Turkey, 2–6 August.
49. McConnachie, M.M., Cowling, R.M., Shackleton, C.M., Knight, A.T., The challenges of alleviating poverty through ecological restoration: insights from South Africa's “working for water” program. Restor. Ecol. 21 (2013), 544–550.
50. McKenney, B.A., Kiesecker, J.M., Policy development for biodiversity offsets: a review of offset frameworks. Environ. Manag 45 (2010), 165–176.
51. Mugido, W., Blignaut, J., Joubert, M., De Wet, J., Knipe, A., Joubert, S., Cobbing, B., Jansen, J., Le Maitre, D., van der Vyfer, M., Determining the feasibility of harvesting invasive alien plant species for energy. S. Afr. J. Sci., 2014, 10.1590/sajs.2014/20130397.
52. Nykvist, B., von Heland, J., Social-ecological memory as a source of general and specified resilience. Ecol. Soc., 19, 2014, 47.
53. Pooley, S., Burning Table Mountain: An environmental history of fire on the Cape Peninsula. 2014, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
54. Price, C., Regulating and supporting services and disservices: customary approaches to valuation, and a few surprising case-study results. New Z. J. For. Sci., 44(Suppl 1), 2014, S5.
55. Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35 (2010), 25–55.
56. Qiu, J., A global synthesis of the effects of biological invasions on greenhouse gas emissions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24 (2015), 1351–1362.
57. Rana, M.P., Akhter, F., Uses of invasive alien plant species in Rema-Kalenga wildlife sanctuary of Bangladesh. J. Mt. Sci. 7 (2010), 380–385.
58. Rasmussen, L.V., Christensen, A.E., Danielsen, F., Dawson, N., Martin, A., Mertz, O., Sikor, T., Thongmanivong, S., Xaydongvanh, P., From food to pest: conversion factors determine switches between ecosystem services and disservices. Ambio, 2016, 10.1007/s13280-016-0813-6.
59. Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Cumming, G.S., Elmqvist, T., Hejnowicz, A.P., Polasky, S., Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social–ecological approach. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11 (2013), 268–273.
60. Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P., Carlton, J.T., A compendium of essential concepts and terminology in invasion ecology. Richardson, D.M., (eds.) Fifty years of invasion ecology. The legacy of Charles Elton, 2011, Wiley-Blackwell, 409–420.
61. Richardson, D.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Invasive alien plants in South Africa: how well do we understand the ecological impacts?. South Afr. J. Sci. 100 (2004), 45–52.
62. Roy, S., Byrne, J., Pickering, C., A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban For. Urban Green. 11 (2012), 351–363.
63. Sagie, H., Morris, A., Rofè, Y., Orenstein, D.E., Groner, E., Cross-cultural perceptions of ecosystem services: a social inquiry on both sides of the Israeli–Jordanian border of the Southern Arava valley desert. J. Arid Environ. 97 (2013), 38–48.
64. Saunders, M.E., Luck, G.W., Limitations of the ecosystem services versus disservices dichotomy. Cons. Biol., 2016, 10.1111/cobi.12740.
65. Schäckermann, J., Mandelik, Y., Weiss, N., von Wehrden, H., Klein, A.-M., Natural habitat does not mediate vertebrate seed predation as an ecosystem dis-service to agriculture. J. Appl. Ecol. 52 (2015), 291–299.
66. Schindler, S., Staska, B., Adam, M., Rabitsch, W., Essl, F., Alien species and public health impacts in Europe: a literature review. NeoBiota 27 (2015), 1–23.
67. Schröter, M., van der Zanden, E.H., van Oudenhoven, A.P.E., Remme, R.P., Serna-Chavez, H.M., de Groot, R.S., Opdam, P., Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Cons. Lett. 6 (2014), 514–523.
68. Shackleton, C.M., Ruwanza, S., Sinasson Sanni, G.K., Bennett, S., Lacy, P., Modipa, R., Mtati, N., Sachikonye, M., Thondhlana, G., Unpacking Pandora's Box: understanding and categorising ecosystem disservices for environmental management and human wellbeing. Ecosystem 19 (2016), 587–600.
69. Shackleton, R.T., Le Maitre, D.C., Pasiecznik, N.M., Richardson, D.M., Prosopis: a global assessment of the biogeography, benefits, impacts and management of one of the world's worst woody invasive plant taxa. AoB Plants, 2014, 10.1093/aobpla/plu027.
70. Shackleton, R.T., Le Maitre, D.C., van Wilgen, B.W., Richardson, D.M., Use of non-timber forest products from invasive alien Prosopis species (mesquite) and native trees in South Africa: implications for management. For. Ecosyst., 2, 2015, 16, 10.1186/s40663-015-0040-9.
71. Shackleton, C.M., McGarry, D., Fourie, S., Gambiza, J., Shackleton, S.E., Fabricius, C., Assessing the effects of invasive alien species on rural livelihoods: case examples and a framework from South Africa. Hum. Ecol. 35 (2007), 113–127.
72. Shapiro, J., Báldi, A., Accurate accounting: how to balance ecosystem services and disservices. Ecosyst. Serv. 7 (2014), 201–202.
73. Simberloff, D., Martin, J.-L., Genovesi, P., Maris, V., Wardle, D.A., Aronson, J., Courchamp, F., Galil, B., García-Berthou, E., Pascal, M., Pyšek, P., Sousa, R., Tabacchi, E., Vilà, M., Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28 (2013), 58–66.
74. Smith, L.M., Case, J.L., Smith, H.M., Harwell, L.C., Summers, J.K., Relating ecosystem services to domains of human well-being: foundation for a U.S. index. Ecol. Indic. 28 (2013), 79–90.
75. Spangenberg, J.H., von Haaren, C., Settele, J., The ecosystem service cascade: further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy. Ecol. Econ. 104 (2014), 22–32.
76. Spangenberg, J.H., Görg, C., Truong, D.T., Tekken, V., Bustamante, J.V., Settele, J., Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. Int. J. Biodiv. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 10 (2014), 40–53.
77. Stoll, S., Frenzel, M., Burkhard, B., Adamescu, M., Augustaitis, A., Baeßler, C., Bonet, F.J., Carranza, M.L., Cazacu, C., Cosor, G.L., Díaz-Delgado, R., Grandin, U., Haase, P., Hämäläinen, H., Loke, R., Müller, J., Stanisci, A., Staszewski, T., Müller, F., Assessment of ecosystem integrity and service gradients across Europe using the LTER Europe network. Ecol. Model. 295 (2015), 75–87.
78. Swinton, S.M., Lupi, F., Robertson, G.P., Hamilton, S.K., Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol. Econ. 64 (2007), 245–252.
79. Tallis, H., Kennedy, C.M., Ruckelshaus, M., Goldstein, J., Kiesecker, J.M., Mitigation for one and all: an integrated framework for mitigation of development impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 55 (2015), 21–34.
80. Tassin, J., Kull, C.A., Facing the broader dimensions of biological invasions. Land Use Policy 42 (2015), 165–169.
81. TEEB - The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, 2013. Guidance Manual for TEEB Country Studies. Version 1.0.
82. van Wilgen, B.W., Richardson, D.M., Challenges and trade-offs in the management of invasive alien trees. Biol. Invasions 16 (2014), 721–734.
83. Vicente, J.R., Pinto, A.T., Araújo, M.B., Verburg, P.H., Lomba, A., Randin, C.F., Guisan, A., Honrado, J.P., Using life strategies to explore the vulnerability of ecosystem services to invasion by alien plants. Ecosystems 16 (2013), 678–693.
84. Villa, F., Bagstad, K.J., Voigt, B., Johnson, G.W., Athanasiadis, I.N., Balbi, S., The misconception of ecosystem disservices: how a catchy term may yield the wrong messages for science and society. Ecosyst. Serv. 10 (2014), 52–53.
85. von Döhren, P., Haase, D., Ecosystem disservices research: a review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecol. Indic. 52 (2015), 490–497.
86. Whelan, C.J., Şekercioğlu, C.H., Wenny, D.G., Why birds matter: from economic ornithology to ecosystem services. J. Ornithol. 156:Supplement 1 (2015), 227–238.
87. Woodford, D.J., Richardson, D.M., MacIsaac, H.J., Mandrak, N.E., van Wilgen, B.W., Wilson, J.R.U., Weyl, O.L.F., Confronting the wicked problem of managing biological invasions. NeoBiota 31 (2016), 63–86.
88. Zhang, W., Ricketts, T.H., Kremen, C., Carney, K., Swinton, S.M., Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol. Econ. 64 (2007), 253–260.