Impacts of biological invasions: What's what and the way forward

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 58-66

  Simberloff, Daniel ^a   Martin, Jean Louis ^b   Genovesi, Piero ^c   Maris, Virginie ^b   Wardle, David A ^d   Aronson, James ^b,e   Courchamp, Franck ^f   Galil, Bella ^g   García Berthou, Emili ^h   Pascal, Michel ⁱ   Pyšek, Petr ^j,k   Sousa, Ronaldo ^l,m   Tabacchi, Eric ⁿ   Vilà, Montserrat ^o  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^c INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND RESEARCH ISPRA   (Italy)

^d SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^e MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^g ISRAEL OCEANOGRAPHIC AND LIMNOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Israel)

^h UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

ⁱ Ecology and Ecosystem Health   (France)

^j INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

^k CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^l UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^m UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

ⁿ UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^o DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

Biosecurity; Community and ecosystem impact; Eradication; Long term management; Societal perception

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; BIOSAFETY; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; GLOBAL CHANGE; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; PERCEPTION;

ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PUBLIC OPINION; REVIEW; UNCERTAINTY;

ANIMALS; COMMUNICATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PUBLIC OPINION; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84871696859     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. National Research Council (USA) Global Change Ecosystems Research 2000, National Academy Press.
2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group 2005, Island Press.
3. TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010, Earthscan.
4. Richardson D.M. Invasion science. The roads travelled and the roads ahead. Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton 2011, 397-401. Blackwell Publishing. D.M. Richardson (Ed.).
5. Asner G.P., et al. Invasive plants transform the three-dimensional structure of rain forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:4519-4523.
6. Pyšek P., Richardson D.M. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2010, 35:25-55.
7. Hulme P.E., et al. Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:403-414.
8. Davis M.A., et al. Don't judge species on their origins. Nature 2011, 474:153-154.
9. Young A.M., Larson B.M.H. Clarifying debates in invasion biology: a survey of invasion biologists. Environ. Res. 2011, 111:893-898.
10. Coates P. American Perceptions of Immigrant and Invasive Species: Strangers on the Land 2007, University of California Press.
11. Gruvel A. Contribution à l'étude de la bionomie générale et de l'exploitation de la faune du Canal de Suez. Mém. Inst. d'égypte 1936, 29:1-229. (in French).
12. Nuñez M.A., Simberloff D. Invasive species and the cultural keystone concept. Ecol. Soc. 2005, 10:r4.
13. Simberloff D. Charles Elton: neither founder nor siren, but prophet. Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton 2011, 11-24. Blackwell Publishing. D.M. Richardson (Ed.).
14. Simberloff D., et al. The natives are restless, but not often and mostly when disturbed. Ecology 2012, 93:598-607.
15. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe (DAISIE) Handbook of Alien Species in Europe 2009, Springer. P.E. Hulme (Ed.).
16. Pyšek P., et al. A global assessment of alien invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment. Global Change Biol. 2012, 18:1725-1737.
17. Duffy J.E. Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:437-444.
18. Galil B.S. Loss or gain? Invasive aliens and biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2007, 55:314-322.
19. Schlaepfer M.A., et al. The potential conservation value of non-native species. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25:428-437.
20. Rodewald A.D. Spreading messages about invasives. Divers. Distrib. 2012, 18:97-99.
21. Ehrenfeld J.G. Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2011, 41:59-80.
22. Vitule, J.R.S. et al. Revisiting the conservation value of non-native species. Cons. Biol.(in press).
23. Pattemore D.E., Wilcove D.S. Invasive rats and recent colonist birds partially compensate for the loss of endemic New Zealand pollinators. Proc. R. Soc. B 2012, 79:1597-1605.
24. Richardson D.M. Pinus: a model group for unlocking the secrets of alien plant invasions?. Preslia 2006, 78:375-388.
25. Dehlin H., et al. Tree seedling performance and belowground properties in stands of invasive and native tree species. N. Z. J. Ecol. 2008, 32:67-79.
26. Mack M.C., D'Antonio C.M. Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13:195-198.
27. Vilà M., et al. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 8:135-144.
28. García-Berthou E., et al. Introduction pathways and establishment rates of invasive aquatic species in Europe. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2005, 62:453-463.
29. Lavergne S., Molofsky J. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:3883-3888.
30. Crooks J.A. Lag times. Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions 2011, 404-410. University of California Press. D. Simberloff, M. Rejmánek (Eds.).
31. Essl F., et al. Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:203-207.
32. Gassó N., et al. Spreading to a limit: the time required for a neophyte to reach its maximum age. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 16:310-311.
33. Vitule J.R.S., et al. Introduction of non-native freshwater fish can certainly be bad. Fish Fish. 2009, 10:98-108.
34. Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions 2011, University of California Press. D. Simberloff, M. Rejmánek (Eds.).
35. Vitousek P.M., et al. Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science 1987, 238:802-804.
36. Wardle D.A., et al. Terrestrial ecosystem responses to species gains and losses. Science 2011, 332:1273-1277.
37. Bardgett R.D., Wardle D.A. Aboveground-Belowground Interactions: Biotic Interactions, Ecosystem Properties and Global Change 2010, Oxford University Press.
38. Ordoñez A., et al. Functional differences between native and alien species: a global-scale comparison. Funct. Ecol. 2010, 24:1353-1361.
39. Ehrenfeld J.G. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 2003, 6:503-523.
40. Liao C.Z., et al. Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytologist 2008, 117:706-714.
41. Simberloff D. How common are invasion-induced ecosystem impacts?. Biol. Invasions 2011, 13:1255-1268.
42. Vilà M., et al. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:702-708.
43. Rejmánek M., Pitcairn M.J. When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal?. Turning the Tide: the Eradication of Invasive Species 2002, 249-253. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. C.R. Veitch, M.N. Clout (Eds.).
44. Gray D.K., et al. Efficacy of open-ocean ballast water exchange as a means of preventing invertebrate invasions between freshwater ports. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2007, 52:2386-2397.
45. Roques A., Auger-Rozenberg M.-A. Tentative analysis of the interceptions of non-indigenous organisms in Europe 1995-2004. Bull. OEPP/EPPO Bull. 2006, 36:490-496.
46. Derraik J.G.B. A survey of the mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) fauna of the Auckland Zoological Park. N. Z. Entomol. 2004, 27:51-55.
47. Keller R.P., et al. Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:203-207.
48. Jarrad F.C., et al. Improved design method for biosecurity surveillance and early detection of non-indigenous rats. N. Z. J. Ecol. 2011, 35:132-144.
49. Kaiser B.A., Burnett K.M. Spatial economic analysis of early detection and rapid response strategies for an invasive species. Resour. Energy Econ. 2010, 32:566-585.
50. Ficetola G.F., et al. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol. Lett. 2008, 4:423-425.
51. Chown S., et al. DNA barcoding and the documentation of alien species establishment on sub-Antarctic Marion Island. Polar Biol. 2008, 31:651-655.
52. Harris S., Timmins S.M. Estimating the Benefit of Early Control of all Newly Naturalised Plants (Science for Conservation: Vol. 292) 2009, New Zealand Department of Conservation.
53. Caut S., et al. Avoiding surprise effects on Surprise Island: alien species control in a multi-trophic level perspective. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11:1689-1703.
54. Genovesi P. Are we turning the tide? Eradications in times of crisis: how the global community is responding to biological invasions. Island Invasives: Eradication and Management 2011, 5-8. IUCN. C.R. Veitch (Ed.).
55. Panzacchi M., et al. Population control of coypu Myocastor coypus in Italy compared to eradication in UK: a cost-benefit analysis. Wildl. Biol. 2007, 13:159-171.
56. McGeoch M.A., et al. Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 16:95-108.
57. Fine J.M., Sorensen P.W. Isolation and biological activity of the multi-component sea lamprey migratory pheromone and new information in its potency. J. Chem. Ecol. 2008, 34:1259-1267.
58. Pala C. Invasion biologists suck it up. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6:63.
59. Aldridge D.C., et al. Microencapsulated BioBullets for the control of biofouling zebra mussels. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:975-979.
60. Martin J.L., et al. Black rats, island characteristics and colonial nesting birds in the Mediterranean: current consequences of an ancient introduction. Conserv. Biol. 2000, 14:1452-1466.
61. Williamson M. Measuring the impact of plant invaders in Britain. Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses 1998, 57-68. Backhuys Publishers. U. Starfinger (Ed.).
62. Gaertner M., et al. Insights into invasion and restoration ecology: time to collaborate towards a holistic approach to tackle biological invasions. NeoBiota 2012, 12:57-76.
63. Golumbia T., et al. History and current status of introduced vertebrates on Haida Gwaii. Lessons from the Islands: Introduced Species and What They Tell Us About How Ecosystems Work 2008, 8-31. Canadian Wildlife Service. A.J. Gaston (Ed.).
64. Martin J.L., et al. Top-down and bottom-up consequences of unchecked ungulate browsing on plant and animal diversity in temperate forests: lessons from a deer introduction. Biol. Invasions 2010, 12:353-371.
65. Hendrix P.F., et al. Pandora's Box contained bait: the global problem of introduced earthworms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2008, 39:593-613.
66. Sax D.F., Gaines S.D. Species invasions and extinction: the future of native biodiversity on islands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:11490-11497.
67. Hobbs R.J., et al. Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:599-605.
68. Mascaro J., et al. Novel forests maintain ecosystem processes after the decline of native tree species. Ecol. Monogr. 2012, 82:221-228.
69. Nagel T. The Structure of Science - Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation 1961, Columbia University Press.
70. Larson B.M.H. Metaphors for Environmental Sustainability: Redefining Our Relationship with Nature 2011, Yale University Press.
71. Pauly P.J. The beauty and menace of the Japanese cherry trees: conflicting visions of American ecological independence. Isis 1996, 87:51-73.
72. Perry D., Perry G. Improving interactions between animal rights groups and conservation biologists. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:27-35.
73. Council of Europe Declaration on Cultural Diversity 2000, Council of Europe.
74. UNESCO UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity 2001, UNESCO.
75. Born W., et al. Economic evaluation of biological invasions: a survey. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 55:321-336.
76. Villéger S., et al. Homogenization patterns of the world's freshwater fish faunas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:18003-18008.
77. Lambertini M., et al. Invasives: a major conservation threat. Science 2011, 6041:404-405.
78. Callicott J.B. Animal Liberation: a triangular affair. Environ. Ethics 1980, 4:311-338.
79. Maris V., Béchet A. From adaptive management to adjustive management: a pragmatic account of biodiversity values. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24:966-973.
80. MacDougall A.S., Turkington R. Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems?. Ecology 2005, 86:42-55.
81. Martin P.H., et al. Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:142-149.
82. Simberloff D. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40:81-102.
83. Lovett G.M., et al. Forest ecosystem responses to exotic pests and pathogens in eastern North America. BioScience 2006, 56:395-405.
84. Wardle D.A., et al. Impacts of introduced browsing mammals in New Zealand forests on decomposer communities, soil biodiversity and ecosystem properties. Ecol. Monogr. 2001, 71:587-614.
85. Anderson C.B., et al. The effects of invasive North American beavers on riparian plant communities in Cape Horn, Chile: do exotic beavers engineer differently in sub-Antarctic ecosystems?. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 128:467-474.
86. Sala E., et al. Alien marine fishes deplete algal biomass in the eastern Mediterranean. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e17356.
87. O'Dowd D.J., Green P.T. Invasional meltdown: do invasive ants facilitate secondary invasions?. Ant Ecology 2010, 271-272. Oxford University Press. L. Lach (Ed.).
88. Fukami T., et al. Above- and below-ground impacts of introduced predators in seabird-dominated island ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:1299-1307.
89. Croll D.A., et al. Introduced predators transform subarctic islands from grassland to tundra. Science 2005, 307:1959-1961.
90. Baxter C.V., et al. Fish invasion restructures stream and forest food webs by interrupting reciprocal prey subsidies. Ecology 2004, 85:2656-2663.
91. Pringle R.M. Nile Perch. Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions 2011, 484. University of California Press. D. Simberloff, M. Rejmánek (Eds.).
92. Loo J.A. Ecological impacts of non-indigenous invasive fungi as forest pathogens. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11:81-96.
93. Boag B., Neilson R. Impact of New Zealand flatworm on agriculture and wildlife in Scotland. Proc. Crop Prot. Northern Br. 2006, 2006:51-55.
94. Sousa R., et al. Non-indigenous invasive bivalves as ecosystem engineers. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11:2367-2385.
95. Talley T.S., et al. Habitat utilization and alteration by the burrowing isopod, Sphaeroma quoyanum, in California salt marshes. Mar. Biol. 2001, 138:561-573.
96. Woodfield R., et al. Final Report on the Eradication of the Invasive Seaweed Caulerpa taxifolia from Agua Hedionda Lagoon and Huntington Harbour, California 2006, Southern California Caulerpa Action Team.
97. Meinesz A. Killer Algae 2001, University of Chicago Press.
98. Boyer A. Extinction patterns in the avifauna of the Hawaiian islands. Divers. Distrib. 2008, 14:509-517.
99. Rodriguez-Cabal, M.A. et al. (in press) The establishment success of non-native birds in Hawaii and Britain. Biol. Invasions.
100. Apostol D., Shlisky A. Restoring temperate forests, a North American perspective. Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier 2012, 161-172. Wiley-Blackwell. 2nd edn. J. Van Andel, J. Aronson (Eds.).