Regulating and supporting services and disservices: Customary approaches to valuation, and a few surprising case-study results

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

Volumn 44, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Price, Colin ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; COMMERCE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS; DECISION MAKING; FORESTRY; SURVEYS;

BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES; CONTEXT DEPENDENT; ECONOMIC VALUATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; SUPPORTING EFFECT; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ECOSYSTEMS;

ACCESSIBILITY; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FORESTRY; POLLUTION TAX; REGULATORY APPROACH; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

COSTS; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84934275071     PISSN: 00480134     EISSN: 11795395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1179-5395-44-S1-S5     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arboricultural Association: Visual amenity valuation of trees and woodlands: the Helliwell system. Romsey, UK: Arboricultural Association; 2008.
2. Barrow P, Hinsley AP, Price C: The effect of afforestation on hydroelectricity generation: a quantitative assessment. Land Use Policy 1986, 3:141-151.
3. Calder IR, Newson MD: Land-use and upland water resources in Britain - a strategic look. Water Resources Bulletin 1979, 15:1628-39.
4. Clark J, Burgess J, Harrison C: "I struggled with this money business": respondents' perspectives on contingent valuation. Ecological Economics 2000, 33:45-62.
5. Davis R: Recreation planning as an economic problem. Natural Resources Journal 1963, 3:239-49.
6. Department of Energy and Climate Change: The UK low carbon transition plan: national strategy for climate and energy. London: The Stationery Office 2009.
7. Eastwood A, Nijnik M, Brooker R, Pakeman R, Artz R, Norton L, Ross L, Bullock J, Vellinga N, Albon S, Fielding D, Irvine RJ, Ramsay S, Cooksley S: Nature conservation and ecosystem service delivery. In JNCC Report. Volume 492. Peterborough, UK: JNCC; 2013.
8. EKOS Lockhart Garratt Ltd, Price C: South West England Woodland & Forestry: Strategic Economic Study. Manchester, UK: Ekosgen; 2009.
9. Environment Agency: Review of 2007 Summer Floods Bristol, UK: Environment Agency; 2007.
10. Flood Risk Management Research Consortium: Impacts of upland land management on flood risk: multi-scale modelling methodology and results from the Pontbren experiment Manchester, UK: University of Manchester; 2008.
11. Hanley N: The role of environmental valuation in cost-benefit analysis. In Environmental Valuation: New Perspectives. Wallingford, UK: CAB International;KG Willis, & JT Corkindale 1995:39-55.
12. Hanley N, Craig S: Wilderness preservation and the Krutilla-Fisher model: the case of Scotland's Flow Country. Ecological Economics 1991, 4:145-64.
13. Healey JR, Price C, Tay J: The cost of carbon retention by reduced impact logging. Forest Ecology and Management 2000, 139:237-55.
14. Helliwell DR: The amenity value of trees and woodlands. Arboricultural Journal 1967, 1:128-31.
15. IPCC: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
16. Kittredge J: Forest Influences. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1948.
17. Law F: The effect of afforestation upon the yield of water catchment areas. Journal of the British Waterworks Association 1956, 38:489-94.
18. Marwell G, Ames RE: Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods IV. Journal of Public Economics 1981, 15:295-310.
19. McPherson EG, Simpson JR, Peper PJ, Xiao Qing Fu: Benefit-cost analysis of Modesto's municipal urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 1999, 25:235-48.
20. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005.
21. Nielsen AB, Olsen SB, Lundhede T: An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 80:63-71.
22. Nijnik M, Pajot G, Slee B, Moffat A: An economic analysis of the establishment of forest plantations in the United Kingdom to mitigate climate change. Forest Policy and Economics 2012, 26:34-42.
23. Ovaskainen V, Kniivilä M: Consumer versus citizen preferences: evidence on the role of question framing. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2005, 49:379-94.
24. Payne BR, Strom S: The contribution of trees to the appraised value of unimproved residential land. Valuation 1973, 22(2):36-45.
25. Pearce D: Forestry expansion: a study of technical, economic and ecological factors No.14, Farnham, UK: Forestry Commission 1991.
26. Price C: Time, discounting and value. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1993, Also freely available in electronic format from http://c.price@bangor.ac.uk.
27. Price C: Pros and cons of alternative evaluation methods. In Environmental valuation: new directions. Wallingford, UK: CAB International;KG Willis & J Corkindale 1995:160-77.
28. Price C: Valuing biodiversity: what, how and by whom? Scottish Forestry 1997, 51:134-142.
29. Price C: Contingent valuation and retrograde information bias. In The living forest Proceedings of the International Symposium on the non-market benefits of forestry. London: The Stationery Office;A Park & C Stewart Roper 1999:37-44.
30. Price C: Exact values and vague products? Contingent valuation and passive use value. In Forest and Social Services - the Role of Research, Research Paper 815. Vantaa, Finland: Finnish Forest Research Institute;T Sievanen, CC Konijnendijk, L Langner, & K Nilsson 2001:205-217.
31. Price C: Superficial citizens and sophisticated consumers: what questions do respondents to stated preference surveys really answer? Scandinavian Forest Economics 2006a, 41:285-96.
32. Price C: Buying certification: pigs in pokes, warm glows, and unexploded bombs. Scandinavian Forest Economics 2006b, 41:265-272.
33. Price C: Subjectivity and objectivity in landscape evaluation: an old topic revisited. In The Economic Value of Landscapes. London: Routledge; M van der Heide, & W Heijman 2012:53-76.
34. Price C: Rising carbon flux price and the paradoxes of forest-based reduction of atmospheric carbon stock: an extended summary. Scandinavian Forest Economics 45, in press.
35. Price C, Willis R: A review of farm woodland research. Report to Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food London Available from c.price@bangor.ac.uk.
36. Price C, Willis R: The multiple effects of carbon values on optimal rotation. Journal of Forest Economics 2011, 17:298-306.
37. Seymour J, Girardet H: Far from paradise London: BBC Publications; 1986.
38. Simpson RD, Sedjo RA, Reid JW: Valuing biodiversity for use in pharmaceutical research. Journal of Political Economy 1996, 104:163-185.
39. Stern N: The economics of climate change. London: The Stationery Office 2006, Also at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media.BAC/Executive.
40. UK Treasury (nd): The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London: The Stationery Office
41. Valatin G, Price C: How cost-effective is forestry for climate change mitigation? In Challenges and opportunities for the world's forests in the 21st Century. New York: Springer;Fenning, T 2014:297-339.
42. Watson R, Albon S: UK national ecosystem assessment: synthesis of the key findings. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC; 2011.
43. Willis KG, Garrod GD: Amenity value of forests in Great Britain and its impact on the internal rate of return from forestry. Forestry 1992, 65:331-46.
44. Willis KG, Garrod G, Scarpa R, Powe N, Lovett A, Bateman IJ, Hanley N, Macmillan DC: The social and environmental benefits of forests in Great Britain. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission 2003.