Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 35, Issue , 2010, Pages 25-55

  Pyšek, Petr ^a,b   Richardson, David M ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

biological invasions; early detection; ecological and economic impacts; novel ecosystems; pathway and vector management; rapid response; risk assessment

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; EARLY DETECTION; ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACTS; NOVEL ECOSYSTEMS; PATHWAY AND VECTOR MANAGEMENT; RAPID RESPONSE;

BIODIVERSITY; CIVIL AVIATION; FORESTRY; HEALTH RISKS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ECOSYSTEMS;

EID: 77953143636     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-033009-095548     Document Type: Article

References (164)

1. Mc Neely J A, Mooney HA, Neville LE, Schei P, Waage J K, eds. 2001. Global Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. Gland, Switz./Cambridge, UK: IUCNon behalf of Glob. Invasive Species Program
2. Millenn. Ecosyst. Assess. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report. Washington, DC: Island
3. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Jaroš́ik V. 2006. Who cites who in the invasion zoo: insights from an analysis of the most highly cited papers in invasion ecology. Preslia 78, 437-68
4. McGeoch MA, Butchart SHM, Spear D, Marais E, Kleynhans EJ, et al. 2010. Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Divers. Distrib. 16:95-108
5. Richardson DM, Pyšek P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and com-munityinvasibility. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 30:409-31
6. Blackburn TM, Lockwood JL, Cassey P. 2009. Avian Invaders: The Ecology and Evolution of Exotic Birds. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
7. Davis MA. 2009. Invasion Biology. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
8. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, RejmánekM, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 6:93-107
9. Hulme PE, Bacher S, Kenis M, Klotz S, Kühn I, et al. 2008. Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J. Appl. Ecol. 45:403-14
10. Caley P, Groves RH, Barker R. 2008. Estimating the invasion success of introduced plants. Divers. Distrib. 14:196-203
11. Pyšek P, Richardson DM. 2007. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: Where do we stand? See Ref 164, 97-125
12. Van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M. 2010. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and noninvasive plant species. Ecol. Lett. 13:235-45
13. Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D'Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmánek M. 2000. Plant invasions: the role of mutualisms. Biol. Rev. 75:65-93
14. Lockwood J L, Cassey P, Blackburn TM. 2009. The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers. Distrib. 15:904-10
15. Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck KA. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:7043-50
16. Keane RM, Crawley MJ. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:164-70
17. Blumenthal D, Mitchell CE, Pyšek P, Jaroš́ikV. 2009. Synergy between pathogen release and resource availability in plantinvasion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:7899-904
18. Davis M A, Grime J P, Thompson K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88:528-34
19. Lonsdale M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522-36
20. Chytrý M, Jaroš́ik V, Pyšek P, Hájek O, Knollova I, et al. 2008. Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology 89:1541-53
21. D'Antonio CM, Levine J, Thomsen M. 2001. Propagule supplyandresistance to invasion: a California botanical perspective. J. Mediterr. Ecol. 2:233-45
22. di Castri F. 1989. History of biological invasions with special emphasis on the Old World. In Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, ed. JA Drake, HA Mooney, F di Castri, RH Groves, FJ Kruger, et al., pp. 1-30. Chichester: Wiley
23. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Midgley GF, Hughes GO, Rouget M. 2005. Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob. Change Biol. 11:2234-50
24. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Webster G, Williamson M, Kirschner J. 2004. Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131-43
25. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Simberloff D, Mader AD. 2008. Biological invasions-the widening debate: response to Charles Warren. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 32:295-98
26. Brooks ML, D'Antonio CM, Richardson DM, Grace JB, Keeley J E, et al. 2004. Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. Bio Science 54:677-88
27. Clark KL, Skowronski N, Hom J. 2010. Invasive insects impact forest carbon dynamics. Glob. Change Biol. 16:88-101
28. Traveset A, Richardson DM. 2006. Biological invasions as disruptors of plant-animal reproductive mu-tualisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21:208-16
29. Peltzer DA, Allen RB, Lovett GM, Whitehead D, Wardle DA. 2010. Effect of biological invasions on forestcarbonsequestration. Glob. Change Biol. 16:732-46
30. Simberloff D, Von Holle B. 1999. Positive interaction of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol. Invasions 1:21-32
31. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, et al. 1999. Impact: toward a frame-work for understanding the ecological effect of invaders. Biol. Invasions 1:3-19
32. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, Jaroš́ik V, Sixtová Z, Weber E. 2008. Geographical and taxonomic biasesininvasionecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:237-44
33. VilàM, Basnou C, PyšekP, Josefsson M, Genovesi P, et al. 2010. Howwell do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecological services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front. Ecol. Environ. 8:135-44
34. Levine J M, VilàM, D'Antonio CM, Dukes J S, Grigulis K, Lavorel S. 2003. Mechanismsunderlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 270:775-81
35. Vilà M, Weber E, D'Antonio CM. 2000. Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biol. Invasions 2:207-17
36. Liao CZ, Peng RH, Luo YQ, Zhou ZX, Wu XW, et al. 2008. Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytol. 177:706-14
37. Gaertner M, Breeyen AD, Hui C, Richardson DM. 2009. Impacts of alien plant invasions on species richness in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 33:319-38
38. Vilà M, Williamson M, Lonsdale M. 2004. Competition experiments on alien weeds with crops: lessons for measuring invasive impact? Biol. Invasions 6:59-69
39. Desprez-Loustau ML, Robin C, Buée M, Courtecuisse R, Garbaye J, et al. 2007. The fungal dimension of biologicalinvasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:472-80
40. Kenis M, Auger-Rozenberg MA, Roques A, Timms L, Pere C, et al. 2009. Ecological effects of invasive alieninsects. Biol. Invasions 11:21-45
41. Wagner DL, Van Driesche RG. 2010. Threats posed to rare or endangered insects by invasions of nonnative species. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55:547-68
42. Hendrix PF, Callaham MAJr, Drake J M, Huang C-Y, James SW, et al. 2008. Pandora's box contained bait: the global problem of introduced earthworms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39:593-613
43. Ciruna KA, Meyerson LA, Gutierrez A. 2004. The ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive alien species in inland water ecosystems. Rep. to Convention on Biological Diversity on behalf of Global Invasive Species Program., UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/10/INF/4, Washington, DC
44. Grosholz E. 2002. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:22-27
45. Long J L. 2003.Introduced Mammals of the World: Their History, Distribution andInfluence. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publ.
46. Spear D, Chown SL. 2009. Non-native ungulates as a threat to biodiversity. J. Zool. 279:1-17
47. Milton SJ, WilsonJ R U, Richardson DM, Seymour CL, Dean WRJ, et al. 2007. Invasive alien plants infiltrate bird-mediated shrub nucleation processes in arid savanna. J. Ecol. 95:648-61
48. Hejda M, Pyšek P, Jaroš́ik V 2009. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J. Ecol. 97:393-403
49. Olden J D, Poff NL. 2003. Toward a mechanistic understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization. Am. Nat. 162:442-60
50. Mc Kinney ML. 2005. Species introduced from nearby sources have a more homogenizing effect than species from distant sources: evidence from plants and fishes in the USA. Divers. Distrib. 11:367-74
51. Sax DF, Gaines SD. 2003. Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:561-66
52. Winter M, Schweiger O, Klotz S, Nentwig W, Andriopoulos P, et al. 2009. Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:21721-25
53. Sax DF, Gaines SD, Brown J H. 2002. Species invasions exceed extinctions on islands worldwide: a comparative study of plants and birds. Am. Nat. 160:766-83
54. Stohlgren T J, Barnett DT, Jarnevich C S, Flather C, Kartesz J. 2008. The myth of plant speciessaturation. Ecol. Lett. 11:313-22
55. Asner GP, Hughes RF, Vitousek PM, Knapp DE, Kennedy-Bowdoin T, et al. 2008. Invasive plants transform the three-dimensional structure of rain forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:4519-23
56. Binimelis R, Born W, Monterroso I, Rodŕiguez-Labajos B. 2007. Socio-economic impacts and assessment of biological invasions. See Ref. 164, pp. 331-47
57. Meyerson LA, Baron J, Melillo J M, Naiman RJ, O'Malley RI, et al. 2005. Aggregate measures of ecosys-tem services: Can we take the pulse of nature? Front. Ecol. Environ. 3:56-59
58. Pejchar L, Mooney HA. 2009. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:497-504
59. Kettunen M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Pagad S, Starfinger U, et al. 2009. Technical support to EU strategy on invasive species (IAS): assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU. (final module Rep. for Eur. Comm.), Serv. contract 070307/2007/483544/MAR/B2, Inst. Eur. Environ. Policy (IEEP), Brussels
60. Antia R, Regoes RR, Koella J C, Bergstrom CT. 2003. The role of evolutionin the emergence of infectious diseases. Nature 426:658-60
61. Pimentel D, ed. 2002. Biological Invasion: Economic and Environmental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Species. Boca Raton: CRC Press
62. Lambdon PW, Pyšek P, Basnou C, Hejda M, Arianoutsou M, et al. 2008. Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80:101-49
63. van Wilgen BW, Reyers B, Le Maitre DC, Richardson DM, Schonevegel L. 2008. A biome-scale as-sessment of the impact of invasive alien plants on ecosystem services in South Africa. J. Environ. Manag. 89:336-49
64. DAISIE. 2009. Handbook of Alien Species in Europe. Berlin: Springer
65. Sax DF, Gaines SD. 2008. Species invasions and extinction: the future of native biodiversity on islands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:11490-97
66. Cox J G, Lima SL. 2006. Näivite and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced preda-tors. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21:674-80
67. Richardson DM, van Wilgen BW. 2004. Invasive alien plants in South Africa: How well do we understand the ecological impacts? S. Afr. J. Sci. 100:45-52
68. Lowell SJ, Stone SF, Fernandez L. 2006. The economic impact of aquatic invasive species: a review of the literature. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 35:195-208
69. Zavaleta E. 2000. Valuing ecosystem services lost to Tamarix invasion in the United States. In Invasive Species in a Changing World, ed. HAMooney, RJ Hobbs, pp. 261-300. Washington, DC: Island
70. Panzacchi M, Bertolino S, Cocchi R, Genovesi P. 2007. Population control of coypu Myocastor coypus in Italy compared to eradication in UK a cost-benefit analysis. Wildl. Biol. 13:159-71
71. Off. Technol. Assess. 1993. Harmful Nonindigenous Species in the United States. Washington, DC: US Gov. Print. Off.
72. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52:273-88
73. Sinden J, Jones R, Hester S, Odom D, Kalisch C, et al. 2004. The Economic Impact of Weeds in Australia. Adelaide: Tech. Ser. 8, CRC forAust. Weed Manag.
74. van Wilgen BW, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, Marais C, Magadlela D. 2001. The economic con-sequences of alien plant invasions: examples of impacts and approaches for sustainable management in South Africa. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 3:145-68
75. Marais C, van Wilgen BW, Stevens D. 2004. The clearing of invasive alien plants in South Africa: a preliminaryassessment of costs and progress. S. Afr. J. Sci. 100:97-103
76. de Wit MP, Crookes DJ, van Wilgen BW. 2001. Conflicts of interest in environmental management: estimating the costs and benefits of black wattle (Acacia mearnsii) in South Africa. Biol. Invasions 3:167-78
77. Yelenik SG, Stock WD, Richardson DM. 2004. Ecosystem level impacts of invasive Acaciasaligna in the South African fynbos. Restor. Ecol. 12:44-51
78. Schmidt KA, Whelan CJ. 1999. Effects of exotic Lonicera and Rhamnus on songbird nest predation. Conserv. Biol. 13:1502-6
79. Dean WRJ, Anderson MD, Milton SJ, Anderson TA. 2002. Avian assemblages in Acacia and Prosopis drainage line woodland in the Kalahari, South Africa. J. Arid Environ. 51:1-20
80. Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM. 2009. Multitrophic effects of invasions in marine and estuarine systems. In Marine Bioinvasions:Ecology, Conservationand Management Perspectives, ed. GRilov, J Crooks, pp. 305-24. New York: Springer
81. Nentwig W, Kühnel E, Bacher S. 2010. A generic impact-scoring system applied to alien mammals in Europe. Conserv. Biol. 24:302-11
82. Olenin S, Minchin D, Daunys D. 2007. Assessment of biopollution in aquatic ecosystems. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 55:379-94
83. Hulme PE, Nentwig W, Pyšek P, Vilà M. 2009. Common market, shared problems: time for a coordi-nated response to biological invasions in Europe? Neobiota 8:3-19
84. Baker RHA, Battisti A, Bremmer J, Kenis M, Mumford J, et al. 2009. PRATIQUE: A research project to enhance pest risk analysis techniques in the European Union. EPPO/OEPP Bull. 39:87-93
85. Counc. Eur. Union. 2009. Council Conclusions on aMid-termAssessment of Implementing the EUBiodiversity Action Plan and Towards an EUStrategy on Invasive Alien Species. Luxembourg: Eur. Comm.
86. Hulme PE. 2011. Biosecurity: the changing face of invasion biology. In Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology, ed. DM Richardson, pp. 301-14. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. In press
87. Roques A, Auger-Rozenberg M A. 2006. Tentative analysis of the interceptions of nonindigenous organ-isms in Europe during 1995-2004. EPPO/OEPP Bull. 36:490-96
88. Kolar CS, Lodge DM. 2002. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233-36
89. Marchetti MP, Moyle PB, Levine R. 2004. Alien fishes in California watersheds: characteristics of successful and failed invaders. Ecol. Appl. 14:587-96
90. Gordon DR, Onderdonk DA, Fox AM, Stocker RK. 2008. Consistent accuracy of the Australian Weed Risk Assessment system across varied geographies. Divers. Distrib. 14:234-42
91. Veltman CJ, Nee S, Crawley M J. 1996. Correlates of introduction success in exotic New Zealand birds. Am. Nat. 147:542-57
92. Crall AW, Meyerson LA, Stohlgren TJ, Jarnevich CS, Newman GJ, Graham J. 2006. Show me the numbers: What data currently exist for non-native species in the USA? Front. Ecol. Environ. 4:414-18
93. Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR. 1999. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J. Environ. Manag. 57:239-51
94. Daehler CC, Denslow J L, Ansari S, Kuo H. 2004. A risk assessment system for screening out harmful invasive pest plants from Hawaii's and other Pacific islands. Conserv. Biol. 18:360-68
95. Gordon DR, Riddle B, Pheloung P, Ansari S, Buddenhagen C, et al. 2010. Guidance for addressing the Australian Weed Risk Assessmentquestions. Plant Prot. Q. 25:56-74
96. Weber J, Panetta F D, Virtue J, Pheloung P. 2009. Ananalysis of assessmentoutcomes from eightyears' operation of the Australian border weed risk assessment system. J. Environ. Manag. 90:798-807
97. Keller R, Lodge DM, Finnoff D. 2007. Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioe-conomic benefits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:203-7
98. Koch FH, Yemshanov D, Mc Kenney DW, Smith WD. 2009. Evaluating critical uncertainty thresholds in a spatial model of forest pest invasion risk. Risk Anal. 29:1227-41
99. Carey JM, Beilin R, Boxshall A, Burgman MA, Flander L. 2007. Risk-based approaches to deal with uncertainty in a data-poor system: stakeholder involvement in hazard identification for marine national parks and marine sanctuaries in Victoria, Australia. Risk Anal. 27:271-81
100. Stepien C A, Brown J E, Neilson ME, Tumeo MA. 2005. Geneticdiversity of invasivespecies in the Great Lakesversus their Eurasian source populations: insights forrisk analysis. Risk Anal. 25:1043-60
101. Bradley BA, Mustard J F. 2006. Characterizing the landscape dynamics of an invasive plant and risk of invasion using remote sensing. Ecol. Appl. 16:1132-47
102. Rouget M, Richardson DM, Nel JL, van Wilgen BW. 2002. Commercially important trees as invasive aliens-towards spatially explicit risk assessment at a national scale. Biol. Invasions 4:397-412
103. Foxcroft L C, Rouget M, Richardson D M. 2007. Riskassessment of riparianplantinvasionsintoprotected areas. Conserv. Biol. 21:412-21
104. Whittier T R, Ringold P L, Herlihy A T, Pierson SM. 2008. Acalcium-basedinvasionriskassessmentfor zebra and quagga mussels (Dreissena spp). Front. Ecol. Environ. 6:180-84
105. Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Peters MP, Bossenbroek J M, Matthews SN, et al. 2010. Modeling the invasive emerald ash borer risk of spread using a spatially explicit cellular model. Landsc. Ecol. 25:353-69
106. Chytrý M, Pyšek P, Wild J, Maskell LC, Pino J, Vilà M. 2009. European map of alien plant invasions, based on the quantitative assessment across habitats. Divers. Distrib. 15:98-107
107. ChytrýM, Wild J, PyšekP, Jaroš́ikV, Dendoncker N, et al. 2011. Projectingtrends in plantinvasions in Europeunderdifferentscenarios of futureland-usechange. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1466-8238. 2010. 00573. x. In press
108. KrivánekM, Pyšek P. 2006. Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central Europe). Divers. Distrib. 12:319-27
109. Tricarico E, Vilizzi L, Gherardi F, Copp GH. 2010. Calibration of FI-ISK, an invasiveness screening tool for nonnative freshwater invertebrates. Risk Anal. 30:285-92
110. Bossenbroek J M, Johnson LE, Peters B, Lodge DM. 2007. Forecasting the expansion of zebra mussels in the United States. Conserv. Biol. 21:800-10
111. Copp GH, Garthwaite R, Gozlan RE. 2005. Riskidentification and assessment of non-native freshwater fishes: a summary of concepts and perspectives on protocols for the UK. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 21:371-73
112. Reed RN. 2005. An ecological risk assessment of nonnative boas and pythons as potentially invasive species in the United States. Risk Anal. 25:753-66
113. Bomford M, Kraus F, Barry SC, Lawrence E. 2009. Predicting establishment success for alien reptiles and amphibians: a role for climate matching. Biol. Invasions 11:713-24
114. van Wilgen NJ, Richardson DM, Baard EHW. 2008. Alien reptiles and amphibians in South Africa: towards a pragmatic management strategy. S. Afr. J. Sci. 104:13-20
115. Buddenhagen CE, Chimera C, Clifford P. 2009. Assessing biofuel crop invasiveness: a case study. PLo S ONE 4:e5261
116. Hayes KR, Hewitt CL, Behrens HL, Dragsund E, Bakke SM. 2008. Ballast water risk assessment: principles, processes, and methods. ICESJ. Mar. Sci. 65:121-31
117. Drake J M, Lodge DM. 2007. Hull fouling is a risk factor for intercontinental species exchange in aquatic ecosystems. Aquat. Invasions 2:121-31
118. Herborg L-F, Jerde CL, Lodge DM, Ruiz GM, Mac Isaac HJ. 2007. Predicting invasion risk using measures of introduction effort and environmental niche models. Ecol. Appl. 17:663-74
119. Carlton J T, Ruiz GM. 2005. Vector science and integrated vector management in bioinvasion ecology: conceptual frameworks. In Invasive Alien Species, ed. HAMooney, RN Mack, JA Mc Neely, LE Neville, PJ Schei, JKWaage, pp 36-58. Washington, DC: Island
120. Lockwood J L, Cassey P, Blackburn TM. 2009. The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers. Distrib. 15:904-10
121. Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Perrings C, Williamson M. 2007. A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success. Divers. Distrib. 13:527-34
122. Foxcroft LC, Richardson DM, WilsonJ R U. 2008. Ornamental plants as invasive aliens: problems and solutions in Kruger National Park, South Africa. Environ. Manag. 41:32-51
123. Gosper C R, Vivian-Smith G. 2009. Approaches to selectingnative plantreplacements forfleshy-fruited invasive species. Restor. Ecol. 17:196-204
124. Drake J M, Lodge DM. 2004. Global hot spots of biological invasions: evaluating options for ballast-water management. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 271:575-80
125. Lee J E, Chown SL. 2009. Breaching the dispersal barrier to invasion: quantification and man-agement. Ecol. Appl. 19:1944-59
126. WilsonJ R U, Dormontt EE, Prentis PJ, Lowe AJ, Richardson DM. 2009. Something in the way you move: Dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:136-44
127. Koger CH, Shaw DR, Reddy KN, Bruce LM. 2004. Detection of pitted morningglory (Ipomoealacunosa) with hyperspectral remote sensing. II. Effects of vegetation ground cover and reflectance properties. Weed Sci. 52:230-35
128. Barnett DT, Stohlgren TJ, Jarnevich CS, Chong GW, Ericson JA, et al. 2007. The art and science of weed mapping. Environ. Monit. Assess. 132:235-52
129. Hayes KR, Cannon R, Neil K, Inglis G. 2005. Sensitivity and cost considerations for the detection and eradication of marine pests in ports. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50:823-34
130. Ibanez I, Silander JA, Allen J M, Treanor SA, Wilson A. 2009. Identifying hotspots for plant invasions and forecasting focal points of further spread. J. Appl. Ecol. 46:1219-28
131. Harvey CT, Qureshi SA, Mac Isaac HJ. 2009. Detection of a colonizing, aquatic, nonindigenous species. Divers. Distrib. 15:429-37
132. Crall AW, Newman GJ, Stohlgren TJ, Jarnevich CS, Evangelista P, Geuenther D. 2006. Evaluating dominance as a component of non-native species invasions. Divers. Distrib. 12:195-204 (Pubitemid 43356915)
133. DAntonio CM, Jackson NE, Horvitz CC, Hedberg R. 2004. Invasive plants in wildland ecosystems: merging the study of invasion processes with management needs. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2:513-21
134. Armstrong K F, Ball SL. 2005. DNAbarcodes for biosecurity: invasive speciesidentification. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 360:1813-23
135. Meyerson L A, Reaser J K. 2003. Bioinvasions, bioterrorism, and biosecurity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1:307-14
136. Mehrhoff L J, SilanderJ A Jr, Leicht SA, Mosher ES, Tabak NM. 2003. IPANE: Invasiveplant atlas of New England. Dept. Ecol. Evol. Biol., Univ. Conn., Storrs, CT. http://www.ipane. org
137. Smith GF, Figueiredo E. 2009. Capacity building in taxonomy and systematics. Taxon 58:697-99
138. Simberloff D. 2009. We can eliminate invasions or live with them: successful management projects. Biol. Invasions 11:149-57
139. Courchamp F, Chapuis J-L, Pascal M. 2003. Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact. Biol. Rev. 78:347-83
140. Anderson LWJ. 2005. California's reaction to Caulerpa taxifolia: a model for invasive species rapid response. Biol. Invasions 7:1003-16
141. Rejmánek M, Pitcairn MJ. 2002. When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal? In Turningthe Tide: theEradication of Invasive Species, ed. CRVeitch, MNClout, pp. 249-53. Gland, Switz./Cambridge, UK: IUCN
142. Gardener M R, Atkinson R, Renteria J L. 2010. Eradications andpeople: lessons from theplanteradication program in Galapagos. Restor. Ecol. 18:20-29
143. Regan TJ, McCarthy MA, Baxter PWJ, Panetta FD, Possingham HP. 2006. Optimal eradication: when to stop looking for an invasive plant. Ecol. Lett. 9:759-66
144. Holmes PM, Richardson DM, van Wilgen BW, Gelderblom C. 2000. Recovery of South African fynbos vegetation following alienwoody plant clearing and fire: implications forrestoration. Austral Ecol. 25:631-39
145. Zavaleta E, Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA. 2001. Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:454-59
146. Loo SE, Mac Nally R, O'Dowd DJ, Lake PS. 2009. Secondaryinvasions: implications of riparianrestora-tion for in-stream invasion by an aquatic grass. Restor. Ecol. 17:378-85
147. Malcolm GM, Bush DS, Rice SK. 2008. Soil nitrogen conditions approach preinvasion levels following restoration of nitrogen-fixing black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) stands in a pine-oak ecosystem. Restor. Ecol. 16:70-78
148. Wolfe BE, Klironomos JN. 2005. Breaking new ground: soil communities and exotic plant invasion. Bio Science 55:477-87
149. Sogge M K, Sferra SJ, Paxton EH. 2008. Tamarix as habitat for birds: implications for riparian restoration in the southwestern United States. Restor. Ecol. 16:146-54
150. Shafroth PB, Cleverly J R, Dudley TL, Taylor J P, van Riper C 3rd, et al. 2005. Control of Tamarix in the Western United States: implications for water salvage, wildlife use, and riparian restoration. Environ. Manag. 35:231-46
151. Bergstrom DM, Lucieer A, Kiefer K, Wasley J, Belbin L, et al. 2009. Indirecteffects of invasive species removal devastate World Heritage island. J. Appl. Ecol. 46:73-81
152. Collins PW, Latta BC, Roemer GW. 2009. Does the order of invasive species removal matter? The case of the eagle and the pig. PLo S ONE 4:e7005
153. Vilà M, Bartomeus I, Dietzsch AC, Petanidou T, Steffan-Dewenter I, et al. 2009. Invasive plant integra-tion into native plant-pollinator networks across Europe. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 276:3887-93
154. Walther GR, Roques A, Hulme PE, Sykes M, Pyšek P, et al. 2009. Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:686-93
155. Schweiger O, Biesmeijer J C, Bommarco R, Hickler T, Hulme PE, et al. 2010. Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: How climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination. Biol. Rev. 85: doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-185X. 2010. 00125
156. Holmes PM, Richardson DM, Esler KJ, Witkowski ETF, Fourie S. 2005. Adecision-making framework for restoring riparian zones degraded byinvasive alien plants in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 101:553-64
157. Richardson DM, Holmes PM, Esler KJ, Galatowitsch SM, Stromberg JC, et al. 2007. Riparian vegeta-tion: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Divers. Distrib. 13:126-39
158. Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron J S, Bridgewater P, et al. 2006. Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 15:1-7
159. Seastedt TR, Hobbs RJ, Suding KN. 2008. Management of novel ecosystems: Are novel approaches required? Front. Ecol. Environ. 6:547-53
160. Walther G R, Gritti E S, Berger S, Hickler T, Tang Z Y, Sykes M T. 2007. Palms tracking climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16:801-9
161. Stachowicz J J, Terwin J R, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW. 2002. Linking climate change and biologi-cal invasions: Ocean warming facilitates nonindigenous species invasions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:15497-500
162. Occhipinti-Ambrogi A. 2007. Global change and marine communities: alien species and climate change. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 55:342-52
163. Stromberg J C, Chew M K, Nagler PL, Glenn EP. 2009. Changing perceptions of change: the role of scientists in Tamarix and river management. Restor. Ecol. 17:177-86
164. Nentwig W, ed. 2007. Biological Invasions. Berlin: Springer