Stakeholders’ perceptions on ecosystem services in Östergötland's (Sweden) threatened oak wood-pasture landscapes

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 158, Issue , 2017, Pages 96-104

  Garrido, Pablo ^a   Elbakidze, Marine ^a   Angelstam, Per ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Cultural services; Landscape beauty; Oak wood pastures; Qualitative research; Socio cultural valuation

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BIODIVERSITY; WOOD;

CULTURAL SERVICES; LANDSCAPE BEAUTY; OAK WOOD; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIO-CULTURAL;

ECOSYSTEMS;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; PASTURE; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; PUBLIC SECTOR; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SERVICE PROVISION; STAKEHOLDER; VALUATION; WOOD;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; RESEARCH; WOOD;

OSTERGOTLAND; SWEDEN;

QUERCUS;

EID: 85001975428     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.018     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Andersson, E., Nykvist, B., Malinga, R., Jaramillo, F., Lindborg, R., A social–ecological analysis of ecosystem services in two different farming systems. AMBIO 44:1 (2015), 102–112, 10.1007/s13280-014-0603-y.
2. Antrop, M., Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning 70 (2005), 21–34.
3. Atkinson, R., Flint, J., Snowball sampling the SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. 2004, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. Ban, N.C., Mills, M., Tam, J., Hicks, C.C., Klain, S., Stoeckl, N., Chan, K.M.A., A social?ecological approach to conservation planning: Embedding social considerations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:4 (2013), 194–202, 10.1890/110205.
5. Bergman, K.-O., Ask, L., Askling, J., Ignell, H., Wahlman, H., Milberg, P., Importance of boreal grasslands in Sweden for butterfly diversity and effects of local and landscape habitat factors. Biodiversity and Conservation 17:1 (2007), 139–153, 10.1007/s10531-007-9235-x.
6. Bergman, K.-O., Askling, J., Ekberg, O., Ignell, H., Wahlman, H., Milberg, P., Landscape effect on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region. Ecography 27 (2004), 619–628.
7. Bergmeier, E., Petermann, J., Schröder, E., Geobotanical survey of wood-pasture habitats in Europe: Diversity, threats and conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 19:11 (2010), 2995–3014, 10.1007/s10531-010-9872-3.
8. Bryman, A., Social research methods. 3rd ed., 2008, Oxford University Press Inc, New York.
9. Bugalho, M.N., Caldeira, M.C., Pereira, J.S., Aronson, J., Pausas, J.G., Mediterranean cork oak savannas require human use to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9:5 (2011), 278–286, 10.1890/100084.
10. Buijs, A., Pedroli, B., Luginbühl, Y., From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: Changing social perceptions of the european landscape. Landscape Ecology 21:3 (2006), 375–389, 10.1007/s10980-005-5223-2.
11. CAB, Multi-purpose management of oak habitats. Examples of best practice from the county of Östergötland, Sweden., 2005, County administration of Östergötland (report 2005:16).
12. CAB, o. Östergötland, C.A.B., (eds.) Eklänet Östergötland—naturinventering av ekmiljöer (The county of oaks—survey of nature conservation values in oak environments), 2006, County Administration Board of Östergötland, Linköping.
13. Chan, K.M.A., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Woodside, U., Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62 (2012), 744–756.
14. Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T., Goldstein, J., Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 74 (2012), 8–18, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.
15. Council of Europe (2000).The European Landscape Convention.
16. Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M., von der Dunk, A., Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109:23 (2012), 8812–8819, 10.1073/pnas.1114773109.
17. de Groot, R.S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., Willemen, L., Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7:3 (2010), 260–272, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
18. Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed., 2011, Sage, London.
19. Eichhorn, M.P., Paris, P., Herzog, F., Incoll, L.D., Liagre, F., Mantzanas, K., Dupraz, C., Silvoarable systems in Europe—Past, present and future prospects. Agroforestry Systems 67:1 (2006), 29–50, 10.1007/s10457-005-1111-7.
20. Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P., Implementing sustainable forest management in Ukraine's Carpathian Mountains: The role of traditional village systems. Forest Ecology and Management 249:1-2 (2007), 28–38, 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.003.
21. Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P.K., Sandström, C., Axelsson, R., Multi-stakeholder collaboration in Russian and Swedish Model Forest initiatives: Adaptive governance toward sustainable forest management?. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 2010, 14.
22. Fagerholm, N., Torralba, M., Burgess, P.J., Plieninger, T., A systematic map of ecosystem services assessments around European agroforestry. Ecological Indicators 62 (2016), 47–65.
23. Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P.L., Montes, C., The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69:6 (2010), 1209–1218, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007.
24. Garrido, P., Cultural oak landscapes as green infrastructure for human well-being (Licentiate Thesis). 2014, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
25. Graves, A.R., Burgess, P.J., Liagre, F., Pisanelli, A., Paris, P., Moreno, G., Dupraz, C., Farmer perception of silvoarable systems in seven European countries. Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., McAdam, J.H., Mosquera-Losada, M.R., (eds.) Agroforestry in europe. current status and future prospects, vol. 6, 2009, Springer Sceince + Business Media B.V., 67–86.
26. Hasund, K.P., Kataria, M., Lagerkvist, C.J., Valuing public goods of the agricultural landscape: A choice experiment using reference points to capture observable heterogeneity. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54:1 (2011), 31–53, 10.1080/09640568.2010.502753.
27. Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R.S., van Ierland, E.C., Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 57:2 (2006), 209–228, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005.
28. Huntsinger, L., Oviedo, J.L., Ecosystem services are social-ecological services in a traditional pastoral system: The case of california's mediterranean rangelands. Ecology and Society, 19(1), 2014, 10.5751/ES-06143-190108.
29. Jørgensen, D., Quelch, P., The origins and history of medieval wood-pastures. Hartel, T., Plieninger, T., (eds.) European wood-pastures in transition. a social-ecological approach, 2014, Routledge, Oxon and New York, 55–69.
30. Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S., Interviews. learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2009, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.
31. Lättman, H., Bergman, K.-O., Rapp, M., Tälle, M., Westerberg, L., Milberg, P., Decline in lichen biodiversity on oak trunks due to urbanization. Nordic Journal of Botany 32:4 (2014), 518–528, 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2013.00413.x.
32. Loman, J., Statistical yearbook of forestry Official statistics of Sweden. 2008, Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping.
33. MA, Millenium ecosystem assessment ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis report., 2005, Island Press.
34. Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Lomas, P.L., Montes, C., Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. Journal of Environmental Management 90:2 (2009), 1050–1059, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.03.013.
35. Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Amo, D.G.D., Montes, C., Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS One, 7(6), 2012, e38970, 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970.
36. Martín-López, B., Montes, C., Ramírez, L., Benayas, J., What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation?. Biological Conservation 142:7 (2009), 1370–1380, 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.030.
37. Mascia, M.B., Brosius, J.P., Dobson, T.A., Forbes, B.C., Horowitz, L., McKean, M.A., Turner, N.J., Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology 17:3 (2003), 649–650, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01738.x.
38. McAdam, J.H., Burgess, P.J., Graves, A.R., Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., Mosquera-Losada, M.R., Classifications and functions of agroforestry systems in Europe. Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., McAdam, J., Mosquera-Losada, M.R., (eds.) Agroforestry in europe. current status and future prospects, vol. 6, 2009, Springer, 21–41.
39. MCPFE, The MCPFE report on sustainable forest management in Europe. state of europe's forests., 2003, Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe Liaison Unit Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
40. Moreno, G., Pulido, F., The functioning, management and persistence of Dehesas. Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., McAdam, J., Mosquera-Losada, M.R., (eds.) Agroforestry in europe. current status and future prospects, vol. 6, 2009, Springer, 127–160.
41. Mosquera-Losada, M.R., McAdam, J.H., Romero-Franco, R., Santiago-Freijanes, J.J., Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., Definitions and components of agroforestry practices in Europe. Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., McAdam, J.H., Mosquera-Losada, M.R., (eds.) Agroforestry in europe. current status and future prospects, vol. 6, 2009, Springer, 3–19.
42. Nieto-Romero, M., Oteros-Rozas, E., González, J.A., Martín-López, B., Exploring the knowledge landscape of ecosystem services assessments in Mediterranean agroecosystems: Insights for future research. Environmental Science & Policy 37 (2014), 121–133.
43. Noss, R.F., Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4:4 (1990), 355–364, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x.
44. Öckinger, E., Bergman, K.-O., Franzén, M., Kadlec, T., Krauss, J., Kuussaari, M., Bommarco, R., The landscape matrix modifies the effect of habitat fragmentation in grassland butterflies. Landscape Ecology 27:1 (2012), 121–131, 10.1007/s10980-011-9686-z.
45. Oppermann, R., Beaufoy, G., Jones, G., High nature value farming in Europe—35 European countries, experiences and perspectives. 2012, Verlag Regionalkultur, Ubstadt–Weiher.
46. Oteros-Rozas, E., Martín-López, B., González, J., Plieninger, T., López, C., Montes, C., Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services in a transhumance social-ecological network. Regional Environmental Change 14:4 (2014), 1269–1289, 10.1007/s10113-013-0571-y.
47. Paltto, H., Nordberg, A., Norden, B., Snäll, T., Development of secondary Woodland in oak wood pastures reduces the richness of rare epiphytic lichens. PLoS One, 6(9), 2011, e24675, 10.1371/journal.pone.0024675.g001.
48. Paltto, H., Thomasson, I., Norden, B., Multispecies and multiscale conservation planning: Setting quantitative targets for red-listed lichens on ancient oaks. Conservation Biology 24:3 (2010), 758–768, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01423.x.
49. Pinto-Correia, T., Future development in Portuguese rural areas: How to manage agricultural support for landscape conservation?. Landscape and Urban Planning 50:1–3 (2000), 95–106.
50. Plieninger, T., Las dehesas de la penillanura Cacereña. Origen y evolución de un paisaje cultural. 2006, Universidad de Extremadura, Servicio de Publicaciones, Cáceres.
51. Plieninger, T., Hartel, T., Martín-López, B., Beaufoy, G., Bergmeier, E., Kirby, K., Van Uytvanck, J., Wood-pastures of Europe: Geographic coverage, social-ecological values, conservation management, and policy implications. Biological Conservation 190 (2015), 70–79, 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.014.
52. Plieninger, T., Modolell y Mainou, J., Konold, W., Land manager attitudes toward management, regeneration, and conservation of Spanish holm oak savannas (dehesas). Landscape and Urban Planning 66:3 (2004), 185–198, 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00100-2.
53. Rackham, O., Ancient woodlands: Modern threats. New Phytologist 180:3 (2008), 571–586, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02579.x.
54. Ranius, T., Aguado, L.O., Antonsson, K., Audisio, P., Ballerio, A., Carpaneto, G.M., Zach, P., Osmoderma eremita (Coleoptera, scarabaeidae, cetoniinae) in europe. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 2005, 28.
55. SBA, Ängs-och betesmarksinventeringen 2002–2004, vol. 6, 2005, Swedish Board of Agriculture [Jordsbruksverket], Jönköping.
56. SBA, Svenskt jordbruk i siffror 1800–2004, vol. 6, 2005, Swedish Board of Agriculture [Jordsbruksverket], Jönköping.
57. SEPA, Swedish environmental protection agency [Naturvårdsverket] Sweden's 16 environmental goals (Report)., 2006 Available from http://www.naturvardsverket.se/sv/Sveriges-miljomal-for-ett-hallbart-samhalle/.
58. Scholte, S.S.K., van Teeffelen, A.J.A., Verburg, P.H., Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods. Ecological Economics 114 (2015), 67–78, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007.
59. Sohel, M.S.I., Ahmed Mukul, S., Burkhard, B., Landscape׳s capacities to supply ecosystem services in Bangladesh: A mapping assessment for Lawachara National Park. Ecosystem Services 12 (2015), 128–135, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.015.
60. Svensson, R., Floravård i jordbrukslandskapet (Flora conservation in the agricultural landscape). Svensk botanisk tidskrift 82 (1988), 458–465.
61. Szücs, L., Anders, U., Bürger-Arndt, R., Assessment and illustration of cultural ecosystem services at the local scale—a retrospective trend analysis. Ecological Indicators 50:0 (2015), 120–134, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.015.
62. TEEB, Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity.
63. Tacconi, L., Biodiversity and ecological economics participation, values, and resource management. 2000, Earthscan, London.
64. van Berkel, D.B., Verburg, P.H., Sensitising rural policy: Assessing spatial variation in rural development options for Europe. Land Use Policy 28:3 (2011), 447–459, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.09.002.
65. Vihervaara, P., Rönkä, M., Walls, M., Trends in ecosystem service research: Early steps and current drivers. AMBIO 39:4 (2010), 314–324, 10.1007/s13280-010-0048-x.
66. Villamor, G., Palomo, I., Santiago, C., Oteros-Rozas, E., Hill, J., Assessing stakeholders' perceptions and values towards social-ecological systems using participatory methods. Ecological Processes 3:1 (2014), 1–12, 10.1186/s13717-014-0022-9.
67. Wilkinson, C., Saarne, T., Peterson, G.D., Colding, J., Strategic spatial planning and the ecosystem services concept—an historical exploration. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 2013, 37.
68. Wolff, S., Schulp, C.J.E., Verburg, P.H., Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators 55:0 (2015), 159–171, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016.