Belief in school meritocracy as a system-justifying tool for low status students

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Wiederkehr, Virginie ^a   Bonnot, Virginie ^b   Krauth Gruber, Silvia ^b   Darnon, Céline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Belief in school meritocracy; School system; Selection; Socioeconomic status; System justification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84999836284     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01053     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., and Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 19, 586-592. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
2. Beauvois, J. L., Bourjade, A., and Pansu, P. (1991). Norme d'internalité et évaluation professionnelle [Internality norm and professional assessment]. Int. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 4, 9-28.
3. Bonnot, V., and Jost, J. T. (2014). Divergent effects of system justification salience on men's and women's academic self-assessments and memory for their standardized test scores. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 17, 453-464. doi: 10.1177/1368430213512008
4. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J. C., and Nice, R (1990). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: SAGE.
5. Bressoux, P., and Pansu, P. (2003). Quand les Enseignants Jugent Leurs élèves. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
6. Brinbaum, Y., Duru-Bellat, M., Tenret, E., Croizet, J. C., and Chauvel, L. (2007). Education, Intériorisation de la Méritocratie et Perception des Frontières Entre Groupes Sociaux [Education, Internalization of Meritocracy and Perception of the Borders between Social Groups]. ACI Education Formation, Report No. halshs-00095404.
7. Caricati, L., and Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2012). Does status matter? Testing hypotheses from strong form of system justification theory. Int. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 25, 67-95.
8. Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., Delmas, F., Pulfrey, C., and Butera, F. (2009). Achievement goal promotion at university: social desirability and social utility of mastery and performance goals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96, 119-134. doi: 10.1037/a0012824
9. Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., and Poortvliet, P. M. (2012). Achievement goals in educational contexts: a social psychology perspective. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 6, 760-771. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00457.x
10. Davey, L. M., Bobocel, D. R., Son-Hing, L. S., and Zanna, M. P. (1999). Preference for the merit principle scale: an individual difference measure of distributive justice preferences. Soc. Justice Res. 12, 223-240. doi: 10.1023/A:1022148418210
11. Dompnier, B., and Pansu, P. (2010). La valeur sociale des explications causales en contexte éducatif [The social value of causal explanations in an educational context]. Swiss J. Psychol. 69, 39-51. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000005
12. Dompnier, B., Pansu, P., and Bressoux, P. (2006). An integrative model of scholastic judgments: pupils' characteristics, class context, halo effect and internal attributions. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 21, 119-133. doi: 10.1007/BF03173572
13. Duru-Bellat, M., Meuret, D., and Bègue, L. (2009). Les Sentiments de Justice à et sur L'école [The Feelings of Justice at School and on School]. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
14. Duru-Bellat, M., and Tenret, E. (2012). Who's for Meritocracy? individual and contextual variations in the faith. Comp. Educ. Rev. 56, 223-247. doi: 10.1086/661290
15. Duru-Bellat, M., and Tenret, É. (2009). L'emprise de la méritocratie scolaire: quelle légitimité? [The influence of school meritocracy: how legitimate is it?] Rev. Fr. Sociol. 50, 229-258. doi: 10.3917/rfs.502.0229
16. Fiske, E. B. (2012). Atlas Mondial de L'eìgaliteì des Genres dans L'eìducation [World Atlas of Gender Equality in Education]. Available online at: http://www7.bibl.ulaval.ca/doelec/lc/L/Atlas_mondial_egalite_Fiske.pdf
17. Forsé, M., and Parodi, M. (2011). La perception des inégalités en France depuis dix ans [The perception of inequality in France for ten years]. Rev. l'OFCE 118, 5-32. doi: 10.3917/reof.118.0005
18. Fraser, J., and Kick, E. (2000). The interpretive repertoires of whites on racetargeted policies: claims making of reverse discrimination. Sociol. Perspect. 43, 13-28. doi: 10.2307/1389780
19. Jost, J. (2001). "Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: an experimental paradigm for investigating the effects of socio-economic success on stereotype content". in Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition, ed G. Moskowitz (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 89-102.
20. Jost, J., Banaji, M. R., and Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Polit. Psychol. 25, 881-919. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
21. Jost, J., and Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of systemjustifying ideologies. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 14, 260-265. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
22. Jost, J., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., and Ni-Sullivan, B. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 33, 13-36. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.127
23. Jury, M., Smeding, A., and Darnon, C. (2015). First-generation students' underperformance at university: the impact of the function of selection. Front. Psychol. 6:710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00710
24. Kay, A. C., and Friesen, J. (2011). On social change and social stability: understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 360-364. doi: 10.1177/0963721411422059
25. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Laurin, K., Friesen, J., Zanna, M. P., et al. (2009). The power of the status quo: direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 97, 421-434. doi: 10.1037/a0015997
26. Kay, A. C., and Jost, J. (2003). Complementary justice: effects of "poor but happy". and "poor but honest". stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85, 823-837. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
27. Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., and Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: how the rich are different from the poor. Psychol. Rev. 119, 546-572. doi: 10.1037/a0028756
28. Kraus, M. W., and Stephens, N. M. (2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 6, 642-656. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00453.x
29. Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Jost, J., and Pohl, M. J. (2011). Working for the system: motivated defense of meritocratic beliefs. Soc. Cogn. 29, 322-340. doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.322
30. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York, NY: Plenum.
31. Major, B., Gramzow, R. H., McCoy, S. K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., and Sidanius, J. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: the role of group status and legitimizing ideology. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 269-282. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.269
32. McCoy, S. K., and Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43, 341-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009
33. McCoy, S. K., Wellman, J. D., Cosley, B., Saslow, L., and Epel, E. (2013). Is the belief in meritocracy palliative for members of low status groups? Evidence for a benefit for self-esteem and physical health via perceived control. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 43, 307-318. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1959
34. Ministère de l'Education Nationale. (2014). Filles et Garçons sur les Chemins de L'égalité: de L'école à L'enseignement Supérieur [Girls and Boys in the Ways of Equality: from School to Higher Education]. Direction de La Prospective, de L'évaluation et de La Performance. Available online at: http://cache.media.education.gouv.fr/file/2014/08/3/FetG_2014_305083.pdf
35. OECD. (2014). Regards sur L'éducation 2014 [Views on Education 2014]. Available online at: http://www.oecd.org/fr/edu/Regards-sur-l%27education-2014.pdf
36. Pansu, P., Dubois, N., and Dompnier, B. (2008). Internality-norm theory in educational contexts. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 23, 385-397. doi: 10.1007/BF03172748
37. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., and Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: taking stock and looking forward. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 17, 271-320. doi: 10.1080/10463280601055772
38. Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., and Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 130, 261-288. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
39. Rubin, M., Denson, N., Kilpatrick, S., Matthews, K. E., Stehlik, T., and Zyngier, D. (2014). "I am working-class". subjective self-definition as a missing measure of social class and socioeconomic status in higher education research. Educ. Res. 43, 196-200. doi: 10.3102/0013189X14528373
40. Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., and Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: social dominance or social identity? Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 42, 161-186. doi: 10.1348/014466603322127166
41. Sidanius, J., and Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Rev. Educ. Res. 75, 417-453. doi: 10.3102/00346543075003417
43. Smeding, A., Darnon, C., Souchal, C., Toczeck-Capelle, M. C., and Butera, F. (2013). Reducing the socio-economic status achievement gap at university by promoting mastery-oriented assessment. PLoS ONE 8:e71678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071678
44. Sommet, N., Pulfrey, C., and Butera, F. (2013). Did my m.d. really go to university to learn? Detrimental effects of numerus clausus on self-efficacy, mastery goals and learning. PLoS ONE 8:e84178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084178
45. Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., Zanna, M. P., Garcia, D. M., Gee, S. S., and Orazietti, K. (2011). The merit of meritocracy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101, 433-450. doi: 10.1037/a0024618
46. Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., and Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: how American universities' focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 1178-1197. doi: 10.1037/a0027143
47. van der Toorn, J., Feinberg, M., Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., Tyler, T. R., Willer, R., et al. (2015). A sense of powerlessness fosters system justification: implications for the legitimation of authority, hierarchy, and government. Polit. Psychol. 36, 93-110. doi: 10.1111/pops.12183
48. Verniers, C., Bonnot, V., Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., and Martinot, D. (in press). "How gender stereotypes of academic abilities contribute to the maintenance of gender hierarchy in higher education". in Men and Women in Social Hierarchies, eds K. Faniko, F. Lorenzi-Cioldi, O. Sarrasin, and E. Mayor (London: Routledge).
49. Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J., and Bauer, P. (2011). Spreading rationalization: increased support for large-scale and small-scale social systems following system threat. Soc. Cogn. 29, 288-302. doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.288
50. Young, M. (1961). The Rise of the Meritocracy, 1870-2033: An Essay on Education and Equality. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.