Domain adaptation with conditional transferable components

33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2016

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages 4149-4165

  Gong, Mingming ^a   Zhang, Kun ^b,c   Liu, Tongliang ^a   Tao, Dacheng ^a   Glymour, Clark ^b   Scholkopf, Bernhard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES;

CAUSAL SYSTEMS; CONDITIONAL DISTRIBUTION; COVARIATE SHIFTS; DIFFERENT DISTRIBUTIONS; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; DISCREPANCY MEASURES; DOMAIN ADAPTATION; EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84998705821     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Baker, C. Joint measures and cross-covariance operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 186:273-211, 1973.
2. Baktashmotlagh, M., Harandi, M.T., Lovell, B.C., and Salzmann, M. Unsupervised domain adaptation by domain invariant projection. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 769-776, Dec 2013. doi:10.1109/ICCV.2013.100.
3. Ben-David, S., Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., and Pereira, F. Analysis of representations for domain adaptation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, Cambridge, MA, 2007. MIT Press.
4. Ben-David, S., Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., Kulesza, A., Pereira, F., and Vaughan, J. W. A theory of learning from different domains. Machine learning, 79(1-2): 151-175, 2010.
5. Cortes, C., Mansour, Y., and Mohri, M. Learning bounds for importance weighting. In NIPS 23, 2010.
6. Edelman, A., Arias, T. A., and Smith, S. T. The geometry of algorithms with orthogonality constraints. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl, 20(2):303-353, April 1999. ISSN 0895-4798.
7. Fukumizu, K., Bach, F. R., Jordan, M. I., and Williams, C. Dimensionality reduction for supervised learning with reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5:73-99, 2004.
8. Gong, B., Shi, Y., Sha, F., and Grauman, K. Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on, pp. 2066-2073. IEEE, 2012.
9. Gong, B., Grauman, K., and Sha, F. Connecting the dot-s with landmarks: Discriminatively learning domain-invariant features for unsupervised domain adaptation. In Proceedings of The 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 222-230, 2013.
10. Gopalan, R., Li, R., and Chellappa, R. Domain adaptation for object recognition: An unsupervised approach. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 999-1006. IEEE, 2011.
11. Gretton, A., Borgwardt, K. M, Rasch, M. J., Scholkopf, B., and Smola, A. A kernel two-sample test. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13:723-773, 2012.
12. Griffin, G., Holub, A., and Perona, P. Caltech-256 object category dataset. Technical Report 7694, California Institute of Technology, 2007. URL http://authors.library.caltech.edu/7694.
13. Huang, J., Smola, A., Gretton, A., Borgwardt, K., and Scholkopf, B. Correcting sample selection bias by unlabeled data. In NIPS 19, pp. 601-608, 2007.
14. Janzing, D. and Scholkopf, B. Causal inference using the algorithmic markov condition. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 56:5168-5194, 2010.
15. Jiang, J. A literature survey on domain adaptation of statistical classifiers, 2008. URL http://sifaka.cs.uiuc.edu/jiang4/domain\-adaptation/survey.
16. Liu, T. and Tao, D. Classification with noisy labels by importance reweighting. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38(3):447-461, March 2016.
17. Long, M, Wang, J., Ding, G., Sun, J., and Yu, P. S. Transfer joint matching for unsupervised domain adaptation. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014 IEEE Conference on, pp. 1410-1417. IEEE, 2014.
18. Long, M., Cao, Y., Wang, J., and Jordan, M. Learning transferable features with deep adaptation networks. In Blei, David and Bach, Francis (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-15), pp. 97-105. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2015. URL http://jmlr.org/proceedings/papers/v37/longl5.pdf.
19. Luo, Y., Liu, T., Tao, D., and Xu, C. Decomposition-based transfer distance metric learning for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 23(9):3789-3801, Sept 2014. ISSN 1057-7149. doi:10.1109/TIP.2014.2332398.
20. Mateo, R., Scholkopf, B., Turner, R and Peters, J. Causal transfer in machine learning. arXiv:1507.05333, Feb 2016.
21. Muandet, K., Balduzzi, D., and Scholkopf, B. Domain generalization via invariant feature representation. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, JMLR: W&CP Vol. 28, 2013.
22. Pan, S. J. and Yang, Q. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22: 1345-1359, 2010.
23. Pan, S. J., Tsang, I. W Kwok, J. T and Yang, Q. Domain adaptation via transfer component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 22:199-120, 2011.
24. Saenko, K., Kulis, B., Fritz, M., and Darrell, T. Adapting visual category models to new domains. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2010, pp. 213-226. Springer, 2010.
25. Scholkopf, B., Janzing, D., Peters, J., Sgouritsa, E., Zhang, K., and Mooij, J. On causal and anticausal learning. In Proc. 29th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2012), Edinburgh, Scotland, 2012.
26. Shimodaira, H. Improving predictive inference under co-variate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 90:227-244, 2000.
27. Si, S., Tao, D., and Geng, B. Bregman divergence-based regularization for transfer subspace learning. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 22 (7):929-942, July 2010. ISSN 1041-4347. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2009.126.
28. Si, S, Liu, W., Tao, D., and Chan, K. P. Distribution calibration in riemannian symmetric space. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 41(4):921-930, Aug 2011. ISSN 1083-4419. doi:10.1109/TSMCB.2010.2100042.
29. Smola, A., Gretton, A., Song, L., and Scholkopf, B. A Hilbert space embedding for distributions. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory, pp. 13-31. Springer-Verlag, 2007.
30. Sriperumbudur, B., Fukumizu, K., and Lanckriet, G. U-niversality, characteristic kernels and rkhs embedding of measures. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12: 2389-2410, 2011.
31. Sugiyama, M, Suzuki, T., Nakajima, S., Kashima, H., von Biinau, P., and Kawanabe, M. Direct importance estimation for covariate shift adaptation. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 60:699-746, 2008.
32. Yu, Y. and Szepesvari, C. Analysis of kernel mean matching under covariate shift. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-12), pp. 607-614, 2012.
33. Kai Zhang, Zheng, V., Wang, Q, Kwok, J., Yang, Q, and Marsic, I. Covariate shift in hilbert space: A solution via sorrogate kernels. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 388-395, 2013.
34. Kun Zhang, Scholkopf, B., Muandet, K., and Wang, Z. Domain adaptation under target and conditional shift. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, J MLR: W&CP Vol. 28, 2013.
35. Kun Zhang, Gong, M., and Scholkopf, B. Multi-source domain adaptation: A causal view. In Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015.