Domain adaptation for object recognition: An unsupervised approach

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 999-1006

  Gopalan, Raghuraman ^a   Li, Ruonan ^a   Chellappa, Rama ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; DISCRIMINATIVE CLASSIFIERS; DOMAIN ADAPTATION; GRASSMANN MANIFOLD; INCREMENTAL LEARNING; INTERMEDIATE REPRESENTATIONS; LABELED DATA; MULTIPLE SOURCE; OBJECT CATEGORIES; SAMPLING POINTS; SEMI-SUPERVISED; TARGET DOMAIN; TWO DOMAINS; UNSUPERVISED APPROACHES;

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 84863396387     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126344     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. P.-A. Absil, R. Mahony, and R. Sepulchre. Riemannian geometry of Grassmann manifolds with a view on algorithmic computation. Acta Appl. Math., 80:199-220, February 2004.
2. H. Bay, A. Ess, T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool. Speeded-up robust features (SURF). CVIU, 110:346-359, June 2008.
3. P. Belhumeur, J. Hespanha, and D. Kriegman. Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE TPAMI, 19:711-720, July 1997.
4. S. Ben-David, J. Blitzer, K. Crammer, A. Kulesza, F. Pereira, and J.W. Vaughan. A theory of learning fromdifferent domains. Machine Learning, 79:151-175, May 2010.
5. S. Ben-David, J. Blitzer, K. Crammer, and F. Pereira. Analysis of representations for domain adaptation. NIPS, pages 137-145, December 2007.
6. S. Ben-David, T. Luu, T. Lu, and D. Pal. Impossibility theorems for domain adaptation. In AISTATS, pages 129-136, Sardinia, Italy, May 2010.
7. A. Bergamo and L. Torresani. Exploiting weakly-labeled web images to improve object classification: A domain adaptation approach. In NIPS, pages 181-189. Vancouver, Canada, December 2010.
8. J. Blitzer, K. Crammer, A. Kulesza, F. Pereira, and J. Wortman. Learning bounds for domain adaptation. In NIPS, pages 129-136, Vancouver, Canada, December 2008.
9. J. Blitzer, M. Dredze, and F. Pereira. Biographies, bollywood, boomboxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. In ACL, pages 440-447, Prague, Czech Republic, June 2007.
10. J. Blitzer, R. McDonald, and F. Pereira. Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning. In EMNLP, pages 120-128, Sydney, Australia, July 2006.
11. L. Bruzzone and M. Marconcini. Domain adaptation problems: A DASVM classification technique and a circular validation strategy. IEEE TPAMI, 32:770-787, May 2010.
12. S. Chalup. Incremental learning in biological and machine learning systems. International Journal of Neural Systems, 12:447-466, June 2002.
13. Y. Chikuse. Statistics on special manifolds, volume 174 of Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer Verlag, 2003.
14. W. Dai, G. Xue, Q. Yang, and Y. Yu. Transferring naive Bayes classifiers for text classification. In National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 540-543, Vancouver, Canada, July 2007.
15. H. Daumé III, A. Kumar, and A. Saha. Co-regularization based semisupervised domain adaptation. In NIPS, pages 478-486. Vancouver, Canada, December 2010.
16. H. Daumé III and D. Marcu. Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26:101-126, May 2006.
17. M. Dredze and K. Crammer. Online methods for multi-domain learning and adaptation. In EMNLP, pages 689-697, Honolulu, HI, USA, October 2008.
18. L. Duan, I. Tsang, D. Xu, and T. Chua. Domain adaptation from multiple sources via auxiliary classifiers. In ICML, pages 289-296, Montreal, Canada, June 2009.
19. A. Edelman, T. Arias, and S. Smith. The geometry of algorithms with orthogonality constraints. SIAM Journal of Matrix Analysis and Application, 20:303-353, April 1999.
20. K. Gallivan, A. Srivastava, X. Liu, and P. Van Dooren. Efficient algorithms for inferences on grassmann manifolds. In IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing, pages 315-318, St. Louis, MO, USA, September 2003.
21. J. Hamm and D. D. Lee. Grassmann discriminant analysis: A unifying view on subspace-based learning. In ICML, pages 376-383, Helsinki, Finland, July 2008.
22. M. Harandi, S. Shirazi, C. Sanderson, and B. Lovell. Graph embedding discriminant analysis on grassmannian manifolds for improved image set matching. In CVPR, pages 2705-2512, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, June 2011.
23. N. Japkowicz and S. Stephen. The class imbalance problem: A systematic study. Intelligent Data Analysis, 6:429-449, October 2002.
24. H. Karcher. Riemannian center of mass and mollifier smoothing. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 30:509-541, May 1977.
25. A. Khotanzad and Y. Hong. Invariant image recognition by zernike moments. IEEE TPAMI, 12:489-497, May 1990.
26. K. Lai and D. Fox. Object recognition in 3D point clouds using Web data and domain adaptation. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 29:1019-1028, August 2010.
27. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60:91-110, November 2004.
28. Y. M. Lui and J. R. Beveridge. Grassmann registration manifolds for face recognition. In ECCV, pages 44-57, Marseille, France, October 2008.
29. Y. Mansour, M. Mohri, and A. Rostamizadeh. Domain adaptation: Learning bounds and algorithms. Arxiv preprint arXiv:0902.3430, 2009.
30. Y. Mansour, M. Mohri, and A. Rostamizadeh. Domain adaptation with multiple sources. In NIPS, pages 1041-1048. Vancouver, Canada, December 2009.
31. S. J. Pan, I. Tsang, J. Kwok, and Q. Yang. Domain adaptation via transfer component analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 22:199-210, February 2011.
32. S. J. Pan and Q. Yang. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22:1345-1359, October 2010.
33. K. Saenko, B. Kulis, M. Fritz, and T. Darrell. Adapting visual category models to new domains. In ECCV, pages 213-226, Heraklion, Greece, September 2010.
34. J. Schlimmer and R. Granger. Incremental learning from noisy data. Machine learning, 1:317-354, March 1986.
35. H. Shimodaira. Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. Journal of Statistical Plan-ning and Inference, 90:227-244, October 2000.
36. G. Tur. Co-adaptation:Adaptive co-training for semi-supervised learning. In ICASSP, pages 3721-3724, Taipei, Taiwan, April 2009.
37. P. Turaga, A. Veeraraghavan, and R. Chellappa. Statistical analysis on Stiefel and Grassmann manifolds with applications in computer vision. In CVPR, pages 1-8, Anchorage, AK, USA, June 2008.
38. M. Turk and A. Pentland. Face recognition using eigenfaces. In CVPR, pages 586-591, Maui, HI, USA, June 1991.
39. C.Wang and S. Mahadevan. Manifold alignment without correspondence. In IJCAI, pages 1273-1278, Pasadena, CA, USA, July 2009.
40. H. Wold. Partial Least Squares, volume 6. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, 1985.
41. Y. Wong. Differential geometry of Grassmann manifolds. Proceed-ings of the National Academy of Science, 57:589-594, March 1967.
42. D. Xing, W. Dai, G. Xue, and Y. Yu. Bridged refinement for transfer learning. PKDD, pages 324-335, September 2007.
43. C. T. Zahn and R. Z. Roskies. Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves. IEEE Trans. Computers, C-21:269-281, March 1972.