Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 227-244

  Shimodaira, Hidetoshi ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

62B10; 62D05; Akaike information criterion; Design of experiments; Importance sampling; Kullback Leibler divergence; Misspecification; Sample surveys; Weighted least squares

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037527188     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3758(00)00115-4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control. 19:1974;716-723.
2. Amari S. Differential-Geometrical Methods in Statistics. Lecture Notes in Statistics. Vol. 28:1985;Springer, Berlin.
3. Basu A., Lindsay B.G. Minimum disparity estimation for continuous models: efficiency, distributions and robustness. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 46:1994;683-705.
4. Cavanaugh J.E., Shumway R.H. An Akaike information criterion for model selection in the presence of incomplete data. J. Statist. Plann. Infererence. 67:1998;45-65.
5. Cressie N., Read T.R.C. Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 46:1984;440-464.
6. Davison A.C. Approximate predictive likelihood. Biometrika. 73:1986;323-332.
7. Dunsmore I.R. Asymptotic prediction analysis. Biometrika. 63:1976;627-630.
8. Efron B. The geometry of exponential families. Ann. Statist. 6:1978;362-376.
9. Field C., Smith B. Robust estimation - a weighted maximum likelihood approach. Internat. Statist. Rev. 62:1994;405-424.
10. Green P.J. Iteratively reweighted least squares for maximum likelihood estimation, and some robust and resistant alternatives (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 46:1984;149-192.
11. Hampel F.R., Ronchetti E.M., Rousseeuw P.J., Stahel W.A. Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions. 1986;Wiley, New York.
12. Johnson R.A. Asymptotic expansions associated with posterior distributions. Ann. Math. Statist. 41:1970;851-864.
13. Komaki F. On asymptotic properties of predictive distributions. Biometrika. 83:1996;299-313.
14. Konishi S., Kitagawa G. Generalised information criteria in model selection. Biometrika. 83:1996;875-890.
15. Lindsay B.G. Efficiency versus robustness: the case for minimum Hellinger distance and related methods. Ann. Statist. 22:1994;1081-1114.
16. Linhart H., Zucchini W. Model Selection. 1986;Wiley, New York.
17. Pfeffermann D., Skinner C.J., Holmes D.J., Goldstein H., Rasbash J. Weighting for unequal selection probabilities in multilevel models. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 60:1998;23-56.
18. Shibata R. Statistical aspects of model selection. Willems J.C. From Data to Model. 1989;215-240 Springer, Berlin.
19. Shimodaira, H., 1994. A new criterion for selecting models from partially observed data. In: Cheeseman, P., Oldford, R.W. (Eds.), Selecting Models from Data: AI and Statistics IV. Springer, Berlin, pp. 21-30 (Chapter 3).
20. Shimodaira, H., 1997. Predictive inference under misspecification and its model selection. Research Memorandum 642, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan.
21. Skinner C.J., Holt D., Smith T.M.F. Analysis of Complex Surveys. 1989;Wiley, New York.
22. Takeuchi, K., 1976. Distribution of information statistics and criteria for adequacy of models. Math. Sci. (153), 12-18 (in Japanese).
23. White H. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica. 50:1982;1-26.
24. Windham M.P. Robustifying model fitting. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 57:1995;599-609.