Simple and efficient targeting of multiple genes through CRISPR-Cas9 in Physcomitrella patens

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 3647-3653

  Lopez Obando, Mauricio ^a   Hoffmann, Beate ^a   Géry, Carine ^a   Guyon Debast, Anouchka ^a   Téoulé, Evelyne ^a,b   Rameau, Catherine ^a   Bonhomme, Sandrine ^a   Nogué, Fabien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

AP2 ERF transcription factor; Butenolide receptor; CRISPR Cas9; KAI2; Moss; Multiple gene targeting

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; FRAMESHIFT MUTATION; GENE DELETION; GENE MUTATION; GENE TARGETING; GENOME; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; PHYSCOMITRELLA PATENS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84996590260     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.033266     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ashton, N. W., N. H. Grimsley, and D. J. Cove, 1979 Analysis of gametophytic development in the moss, Physcomitrella patens, using auxin and cytokinin resistant mutants. Planta 144: 427-435.
2. Ashton, N. W., C. E. M. Champagne, T. Weiler, and L. K. Verkoczy, 2000 The bryophyte Physcomitrella patens replicates extrachromosomal transgenic elements. New Phytol. 146: 391-402.
3. Bae, S., J. Kweon, H. S. Kim, and J.-S. Kim, 2014 Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites. Nat. Methods 11: 705-706.
4. Bezanilla, M., P.-F. Perroud, A. Pan, P. Klueh, and R. S. Quatrano, 2005 An RNAi system in Physcomitrella patens with an internal marker for silencing allows for rapid identification of loss of function phenotypes. Plant Biol. (Stuttg) 7: 251-257.
5. Burkart, G. M., T. I. Baskin, and M. Bezanilla, 2015 A family of ROP proteins that suppresses actin dynamics, and is essential for polarized growth and cell adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 128: 2553-2564.
6. Ceasar, S. A., V. Rajan, S. V. Prykhozhij, J. N. Berman, and S. Ignacimuthu, 2016 Insert, remove or replace: a highly advanced genome editing system using CRISPR/Cas9. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1863: 2333-2344.
7. Collonnier, C., A. Epert, K. Mara, F. Maclot, A. Guyon-Debast et al., 2016 CRISPR-Cas9 mediated efficient directed mutagenesis and RAD51-dependent and-independent gene targeting in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant Biotechnol. J. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12596.
8. Feng, Z., Y. Mao, N. Xu, B. Zhang, P. Wei et al., 2014 Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 4632-4637.
9. Horlbeck, M. A., L. B. Witkowsky, B. Guglielmi, J. M. Replogle, L. A. Gilbert et al., 2016 Nucleosomes impede Cas9 access to DNA in vivo and in vitro. eLife 5:e12677.
10. Horstmann, V., C. M. Huether, W. Jost, R. Reski, and E. L. Decker, 2004 Quantitative promoter analysis in Physcomitrella patens: a set of plant vectors activating gene expression within three orders of magnitude. BMC Biotechnol. 4: 13.
11. Hsu, P. D., D. A. Scott, J. A. Weinstein et al., 2013 DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31: 827-832.
12. Jinek, M., K. Chylinski, I. Fonfara, M. Hauer, J. A. Doudna et al., 2012 A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337: 816-821.
13. Lin, Y., T. J. Cradick, M. T. Brown et al., 2014 CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: 7473-7485.
14. Lopez-Obando, M., C. E. Conn, B. Hoffmann, R. Bythell-Douglas, D. C. Nelson et al., 2016 Structural modelling and transcriptional responses highlight a clade of PpKAI2-LIKE genes as candidate receptors for strigolactones in Physcomitrella patens. Planta 243: 1441-1453.
15. Ma, X., Q. Zhu, Y. Chen, and Y.-G. Liu, 2016 CRISPR/Cas9 platforms for genome editing in plants: developments and applications. Mol. Plant 9: 961-974.
16. Makarova, K. S., Y. I. Wolf, O. S. Alkhnbashi et al., 2015 An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13: 722-736.
17. Mali, P., K. M. Esvelt, and G. M. Church, 2013 Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology. Nat. Methods 10: 957-963.
18. Mizoi, J., K. Shinozaki, and K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2012 AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1819: 86-96.
19. Murén, E., A. Nilsson, M. Ulfstedt, M. Johansson, and H. Ronne, 2009 Rescue and characterization of episomally replicating DNA from the moss Physcomitrella. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 19444-19449.
20. Nakaoka, Y., T. Miki, R. Fujioka, R. Uehara, A. Tomioka et al., 2012 An inducible RNA interference system in Physcomitrella patens reveals a dominant role of augmin in phragmoplast microtubule generation. Plant Cell 24: 1478-1493.
21. Pan, C., L. Ye, L. Qin, X. Liu, Y. He et al., 2016 CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient and heritable targeted mutagenesis in tomato plants in the first and later generations. Sci. Rep. 6: 24765.
22. Pattanayak, V., J. P. Guilinger, and D. R. Liu, 2014 Determining the specificities of TALENs, Cas9, and other genome-editing enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 546: 47-78.
23. Prigge, M. J., and M. Bezanilla, 2010 Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: Physcomitrella patens. Development 137: 3535-3543.
24. Rensing, S. A., D. Lang, A. D. Zimmer, A. Terry, A. Salamov et al., 2008 The Physcomitrella genome reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science 319: 64-69.
25. Schaefer, D. G., 2001 Gene targeting in Physcomitrella patens. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 143-150.
26. Schaefer, D. G., and J.-P. Zryd, 1997 Efficient gene targeting in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 11: 1195-1206.
27. Schaefer, D., J. P. Zryd, C. D. Knight, and D. J. Cove, 1991 Stable transformation of the moss Physcomitrella patens. Mol. Gen. Genet. 226: 418-424.
28. Schaefer, D. G., F. Delacote, F. Charlot, N. Vrielynck, A. Guyon-Debast et al., 2010 RAD51 loss of function abolishes gene targeting and de-represses illegitimate integration in the moss Physcomitrella patens. DNA Repair (Amst.) 9: 526-533.
29. Sfeir, A., and L. S. Symington, 2015 Microhomology-mediated end joining: a back-up survival mechanism or dedicated pathway? Trends Biochem. Sci. 40: 701-714.
30. Strotbek, C., S. Krinninger, and W. Frank, 2013 The moss Physcomitrella patens: methods and tools from cultivation to targeted analysis of gene function. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 57: 553-564.
31. Sugano, S. S., M. Shirakawa, J. Takagi, Y. Matsuda, T. Shimada et al., 2014 CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. Plant Cell Physiol. 55: 475-481.
32. Thyme, S. B., L. Akhmetova, T. G. Montague, E. Valen, and A. F. Schier, 2016 Internal guide RNA interactions interfere with Cas9-mediated cleavage. Nat. Commun. 7: 11750.
33. Untergasser,A., H.Nijveen,X. Rao, T. Bisseling, R. Geurts et al., 2007 Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res. 35: 71-74.
34. Vidali, L., P. A. C. van Gisbergen, C. Guérin, P. Franco, M. Li et al., 2009 Rapid formin-mediated actin-filament elongation is essential for polarized plant cell growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 13341-13346.
35. Wright, A. V., J. K. Nunez, and J. A. Doudna, 2016 Review biology and applications of CRISPR systems: harnessing nature's toolbox for genome engineering. Cell 164: 29-44.
36. Zhang, Z., Y. Mao, S. Ha, W. Liu, J. R. Botella et al., 2016 A multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 platform for fast and efficient editing of multiple genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 35: 1519-1533.
37. Zimmer, A. D., D. Lang, K. Buchta, S. Rombauts, T. Nishiyama et al., 2013 Reannotation and extended community resources for the genome of the non-seed plant Physcomitrella patens provide insights into the evolution of plant gene structures and functions. BMC Genomics 14: 498.