A comparative analysis of the in vitro effects of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment on osteogenic differentiation of two different mesenchymal cell lineages

BioResearch Open Access

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 283-294

  Ceccarelli, Gabriele ^a   Bloise, Nora ^a   Mantelli, Melissa ^b   Gastaldi, Giulia ^a   Fassina, Lorenzo ^a   Cusella De Angelis, Maria Gabriella ^a   Ferrari, Davide ^c   Imbriani, Marcello ^a,d   Visai, Livia ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^b FONDAZIONE IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN MATTEO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^d Ergonomics and Disability   (Italy)

Author keywords

human adipose derived stem cells; human mesenchymal stem cells; osteogenic differentiation; pulsed electromagnetic field

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BONE SIALOPROTEIN; CALCIUM; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; COLLAGEN TYPE 3; DECORIN; FIBRONECTIN; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEONECTIN; OSTEOPONTIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR RUNX2;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW; BONE MATRIX; BONE TISSUE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STIMULATION; CELL VIABILITY; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FRACTURE HEALING; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; IN VITRO STUDY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MESENCHYME CELL; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONTENT; PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; THERAPY EFFECT; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; UPREGULATION;

EID: 84995514600     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21647860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/biores.2013.0016     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bunnell BA, Flaat M, Gagliardi C, et al. Adipose-derived stem cells: Isolation, expansion and differentiation. Methods. 2008;45:115-120.
2. Kuroda Y, Kitada M, Wakao S, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal cells: how do they contribute to tissue repair and are they really stem cells? Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2011;59:369-378.
3. Shekkeris AS, Jaiswal PK, Khan WS. Clinical applications of mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of fracture non-union and bone defects. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2012;7:127-133.
4. Kon E, Filardo G, Roffi A, et al. Bone regeneration with mesenchymal stem cells. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2012; 9:24-27.
5. Izadpanah R, Trygg C, Kriedt BPC, et al. Biologic properties of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue. J Cell Biochem. 2006; 99:1285-1297.
6. Witkowska-Zimny M, Walenko Z. Stem cells from adipose tissue. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2011;16:236-257.
7. Tapp H, Hanle N, Patt J, et al. Adipose-derived stem cells: characterization and current application in orthopaedic tissue repair. Exp Biol Med. 2009;234:1-9.
8. Strem BM, Hicok KC, Zhu M, et al. Multipotential differentiation of adipose tissue-derived stem cells. Keio J Med. 2005; 54:132-141.
9. Bruder SP, Jaiswal N, Haynesworth SE. Growth kinetics, selfrenewal, and the osteogenic potential of purified human mesenchymal stem cells during extensive subcultivation and following cryopreservation. J Cell Biochem. 1997;64: 278-294.
10. De Ugarte DA, Morizono K, Elbarbary A, et al. Comparison of multi-lineage cells from human adipose tissue and bone marrow. Cell Tissues Organs. 2003;174:101-109.
11. Saino E, Fassina L, Van Vlierberghe S, et al. Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells seeded onto gelatin cryogel. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2011;24(1 Suppl. 2):1-6.
12. Hu Y, Cai K, Luo Z, et al. Regulation of the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and osteogenesis in vivo by microenvironmental modification of titanium alloy surfaces. Biomaterials. 2012;33:3515-3528.
13. Hoshiba T, Kawazoe N, Chen G. The balance of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells by matrices that mimic stepwise tissue development. Biomaterials. 2012;33:2025-2031.
14. Kavlock KD, Goldstein AS. Effect of pulse frequency on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in a pulsatile perfusion bioreactor. J Biomech Eng. 2011;133:091005.
15. Kim J, Ma T. Perfusion regulation of hMSC microenvironment and osteogenic differentiation in 3D scaffold. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109:252-261.
16. Carpentier B, Layrolle P, Legallais C. Bioreactors for bone tissue engineering. Int J Artif Organs. 2011;34:259-270.
17. Massari L, Caruso G, Sollazzo V, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields and low intensity pulsed ultrasound in bone tissue. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2009;6:149-154.
18. Midura RJ, Ibiwoye MO, Powell KA, et al. A. Pulsed electromagnetic field treatments enhance the healing of fibular osteotomies. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1035-1046.
19. Walker NA, Denegar CR, Preische J. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and pulsed electromagnetic field in the treatment of tibial fractures: a systematic review. J Athl Train. 2007;42: 530-535.
20. Ciombor DM, Aaron RK. Influence of electromagnetic fields on endochondral bone formation. J Cell Biochem. 1993;52: 37-41.
21. Otter MW, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. Effects of electromagnetic fields in experimental fracture repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355(Suppl):S90-S104.
22. Huang LQ, He HC, He CQ, et al. Clinical update of pulsed electromagnetic fields on osteoporosis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008;121:2095-2099.
23. Midura RJ, Ibiwoye MO, Powell KA, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic field treatments enhance the healing of fibular osteotomies. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1035-1046.
24. Heckman JD, Ingram AJ, Loyd RD, et al. Nonunion treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;161:58-66.
25. Friedenberg ZB, Brighton CT. Bioelectric potentials in bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48:915-923.
26. de Haas WG, Watson J, Morrison DM. Non-invasive treatment of ununited fractures of the tibia using electrical stimulation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62B:465-70.
27. Grace KL, Revell WJ, Brookes M. The effects of pulsed electromagnetism on fresh fracture healing: osteochondral repair in the rat femoral groove. Orthopedics. 1998;21:297-302.
28. Korbling M, Estrov Z. Adult stem cells for tissue repair - a new therapeutic concept? N Engl J Med. 2003;349:570-582.
29. Beresford JN. Osteogenic stem cells and the stromal system of bone and marrow. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;240: 270-280.
30. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284:143-147.
31. Halleux C, Sottile V, Gasser JA, et al. Multi-lineage potential of human mesenchymal stem cells following clonal expansion. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2001;2: 71-76.
32. Fitzsimmons RJ, Ryaby JT, Magee FP, et al. Combined magnetic fields increased net calcium flux in bone cells. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994;55:376-380.
33. Pavalko FM, Norvell SM, Burr DB, et al. A model for mechanotransduction in bone cells: The load-bearing mechanosomes. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88:104-112.
34. Tsai MT, Chang WH, Chang K, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in bone tissue engineering. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007;28: 519-528.
35. Sun LY, Hsieh DK, Lin PC, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields accelerate proliferation and osteogenic gene expression in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells during osteogenic differentiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 2010;31: 209-219.
36. Fassina L, Saino E, Visai L, et al. Electromagnetic enhancement of a culture of human SAOS-2 osteoblasts seeded onto titanium fiber-mesh scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;87:750-759.
37. Bernardo ME, Zaffaroni N, Novara F, et al. Human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells do not undergo transformation after long-term in vitro culture and do not exhibit telomere maintenance mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2007; 67:9142-9160.
38. Romanov YA, Darevskaya AN, Merzlikina NV, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow and adipose tissue: isolation, characterization, and differentiation potentialities. Cell Technol Biol Med. 2005;3:138-143.
39. Bernardo ME, Avanzini MA, Perotti C, et al. Optimization of in vitro expansion of human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells for cell-therapy approaches: further insights in the search for a fetal calf serum substitute. J Cell Physiol. 2007; 211:121-130.
40. Saino E, Grandi S, Quartarone E, et al. In vitro calcified matrix deposition by human osteoblasts onto a zinc-containing bioactive glass. Eur Cell Mater. 2011;21:59-72.
41. van Engeland M, Nieland LJW, Ramaekers FCS, et al. Annexin v-affinity assay: a review on an apoptosis detection system based on phosphatidylserine exposure. Cytometry. 1998;31:1-19.
42. Saino E, Maliardi V, Quartarone E, et al. In vitro enhancement of SAOS-2 cell calcified matrix deposition onto radio frequency magnetron sputtered bioglass-coated titanium scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16:995-1008.
43. Cohen SA, Sideman L. Modification of the o-cresolphthalein complexone method for determining calcium. Clin Chem. 1979;25:1519-1520.
44. Owen TA, Aronow M, Shalhoub V, et al. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol. 1990;143:420- 430.
45. Diniz P, Shomura K, Soejima K, et al. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation on bone tissue like formation are dependent on the maturation stages of the osteoblasts. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002;23:398-405.
46. De Mattei M, Caruso A, Traina GC, et al. Correlation between pulsed electromagnetic fields exposure time and cell proliferation increase in human osteosarcoma cell lines and human normal osteoblast cells in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics. 1990;20:177-182.
47. Selvamurugan N, Kwok S, Vasilov A, et al. Effects of BMP-2 and pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on rat primary osteoblastic cell proliferation and gene expression. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:1213-1220.
48. Quarles LD, Yohay DA, Lever LW, et al. Distinct proliferative and differentiated stages of murine MC3T3-E1 cells in culture: an in vitro model of osteoblast development. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7:683-692.
49. Azari F, Valli H, Guerquin-Kern J, et al. Intracellular precipitation of hydroxyaptite mineral and implications for pathological calcification. J Struct Biol. 2008;162:468-479.
50. Van Dijk S, D' Errico JA, Somemen MJ, et al. Evidence that a non-RGD domain in rat osteopontin is involved in cell attachment. J Bone Miner Res. 1993;8:1499-1506.
51. Denhardt DT, Guo X. Osteopontin: a protein with diverse functions. FASEB J. 1993;7:1475-1482.
52. Aubin JE, Liu F. The osteoblast lineage. In: Principles of Bone Biology. Bilezkian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds). Academic Press: San Diego, CA; pp. 51; 1996.
53. Grzesik WJ, Robey PG. Bone matrix RGD glycoproteins: immunolocalization and interaction with human primary osteoblastic bone cells in vitro. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9: 487-496.
54. Kramer A, Horner S, Willer A, et al. Adhesion to fibronectin stimulates proliferation of wild-type and bcr/abl transfected murine hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96: 2087-2092.
55. Wilson SH, Ljubimov AV, Morla AO, et al. Fibronectin fragments promote human retinal endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation and ERK activation through alpha5beta1 integrin and PI 3-kinase. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44: 1704-1715.
56. Lynch MP, Stein JL, Stein GS, et al. The influence of type I collagen on the development and maintenance of the osteoblast phenotype in primary and passaged rat calvarial osteoblasts: modification of expression of genes supporting cell growth, adhesion, and extracellular matrix mineralization. Exp Cell Res. 1995;216:35-45.
57. Kojima H, Uede T, Uemura T. In vitro and in vivo effects of the overexpression of osteopontin on osteoblast differentiation using a recombinant adenoviral vector. J Biochem. 2004; 136:377-386.
58. Komori T. Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by transcription factors. J Cell Biochem. 2006;99:1233-1239.
59. Otto F, Lubbert M, Stoc M. Upstream and downstream targets of RUNX proteins. J Cell Biochem. 2003;89:9-18.
60. Gaur T, Lengner CJ, Hovhannisyan H, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:33132-33140.
61. Zhou J, He H, Yang L, et al. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone mass and Wnt/b-catenin signaling pathway in ovariectomized rats. Arch Med Res. 2012;43:274-282.
62. Kang KS, Hong JM, Seol YJ, et al. Short-term evaluation of electromagnetic field pretreatment of adipose-derived stem cells to improve bone healing. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2012 Dec 26 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1002/term.1664.
63. Torii Y, Hitomifl K, Yamagishi, Y, et al. Demonstration of alkaline phosphatase participation in the mineralization of osteoblasts by antisense RNA approach. Cell Biol Int. 1996; 20:459-464.
64. Zernick J, Twarog K, Upholt WB. Regulation of alkaline phosphatase and alpha 2(1) procollagen synthesis during early intramembranous bone formation in the rat mandible. Differentiation. 1990;44:207-215.
65. Strioga M, Viswanathan S, Darinskas A, et al. Same or not the same? Comparison of adipose tissue-derived versus bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem and stromal cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21:2724-2752.