Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement—Clinical Update on Recent Advances in the Contemporary Era

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1733-1741

  Ramakrishna, Harish ^a   Patel, Prakash A ^b   Gutsche, Jacob T ^b   Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth ^b   Szeto, Wilson Y ^b   MacKay, Emily ^b   Feinman, Jared W ^b   Shah, Ronak ^b   Zhou, Elizabeth ^b   Weiss, Stuart J ^b   Augoustides, John G ^b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

bleeding; cardiopulmonary bypass; clinical outcomes; duration of stay; femoral artery; femoral vein; full sternotomy; guidelines; mechanical ventilation; meta analysis; minimally invasive aortic valve replacement; mortality; right anterior thoracotomy; stroke; surgical aortic valve replacement; sutureless aortic valve; transesophageal echocardiography; transfusion; upper hemisternotomy

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; AORTIC VALVE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION;

AORTIC VALVE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84995489189     PISSN: 10530770     EISSN: 15328422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.04.014     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. 1 Augoustides, J.G., Wolfe, Y., Walsh, E.K., et al. Recent advances in aortic valve disease: Highlights from a bicuspid aortic valve to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 23 (2009), 569–576.
2. 2 Barnhart, G.R., Shrestha, M.L., Current clinical evidence on rapid deployment aortic valve replacement sutureless aortic bioprostheses. Innovations (Phila) 11 (2016), 7–14.
3. 3 Gutsche, J.T., Patel, P.A., Walsh, E.K., et al. New frontiers in aortic therapy: Focus on current trials and devices in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 29 (2015), 536–541.
4. 4 Carvajal T, Villablanca-Spinetto P, Augoustides JG, et al: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Recent evidence from pivotal trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth [Epub ahead of print].
5. 5 Rao, P.N., Kumar, A.S., Aortic valve replacement through right thoracotomy. Texas Heart Inst J 20 (1993), 307–308.
6. 6 Cosgrove, D.L., Sabik, J.F., Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 62 (1996), 596–597.
7. 7 Cosgrove, D.L., Sabik, J.F., Navia, J.L., Minimally invasive valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 65 (1998), 1535–1538.
8. 8 Cohn, L.H., Adams, D.H., Couper, G.S., et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg 226 (1997), 421–428.
9. 9 Hearn, C.J., Kraenzler, E.J., Wallace, L.K., et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: Anesthetic considerations. Anesth Analg 83 (1996), 3242–3244.
10. 10 Malaisrie, S.C., Barnhart, G.R., Farivar, R.S., et al. Current era minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Techniques and practice. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147 (2014), 6–14.
11. 11 Johnston, W.F., Ailawadi, G., Surgical management of minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 16 (2012), 41–51.
12. 12 Lamelas, J., Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: The ‘Miami Method’. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 4 (2015), 71–77.
13. 13 Nguyen, T.C., Lamelas, J., From the ground up: Building a minimally invasive aortic valve surgery program. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 4 (2015), 178–181.
14. 14 Glauber, M., Ferrarini, W., Miceli, A., Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: State of the art and future directions. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 4 (2015), 26–32.
15. 15 Brown, M.L., McKellar, S.H., Sundt, T.M., et al. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137 (2009), 670–679.
16. 16 Brinkman, W.T., HoffmanW, Dewey, T.M., et al. Aortic valve replacement surgery: Comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and port access groups. Ann Thorac Surg 90 (2010), 131–135.
17. 17 Tabata, M., Umakanthan, R., Cohn, L.H., et al. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33 (2008), 537–541.
18. 18 Raja, S.G., Navaratnarajah, M., Impact of minimal access valve surgery on clinical outcomes: Current best available evidence. J Card Surg 24 (2009), 73–79.
19. 19 Grossi, E., Galloway, A.C., Ribakove, G.H., et al. Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144 (2012), 852–1858.
20. 20 Johnston, D.R., Atik, F.A., Rajeswaran, J., et al. Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144 (2012), 852–858.
21. 21 Lamelas, J., Nguyen, T.C., Minimally invasive valve surgery: When less is more. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 27 (2015), 49–56.
22. 22 Dogan, S., Dzemali, O., Wimmer-Greinecker, G., et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: A prospective randomized trial. J Heart Valve Dis 12 (2003), 76–80.
23. 23 Bonacchi, M., Prifti, E., Giunti, G., et al. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 73 (2002), 460–465.
24. 24 Gilmanov, D., Bevilacqua, S., Murzi, M., et al. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: A propensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 96 (2013), 837–843.
25. 25 Glauber, M., Miceli, A., Gilmanov, D., et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: A propensity score matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145 (2013), 1222–1226.
26. 26 Bakir, I., Casselman, F.P., Wellens, F., et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: A study of 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006), 1599–1604.
27. 27 Biancari, F., Martin, M., Bordin, G., et al. Basic data from 178 studies on the immediate outcome after aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 28 (2014), 1251–1256.
28. 28 Phan, K., Yie, A., D'Eusanio, M., et al. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 98 (2014), 1499–1511.
29. 29 Lim, J.Y., Deo, S.V., Altarabsheh, S.E., et al. Conventional versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Pooled analysis of propensity-matched data. J Card Surg 30 (2015), 125–134.
30. 30 Miceli, A., Murzi, M., Gilmanov, D., et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using right anterior minithoractomy is associated with better outcomes than ministernotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148 (2014), 133–137.
31. 31 Rodriguez, E., Malaisrie, S.C., Mehall, J.R., et al. Right anterior thoracotomy aortic valve replacement is associated with less cost than sternotomy-based approaches: A multi-institution analysis of “real world” data. J Med Econ 17 (2014), 846–862.
32. 32 Nelly, R.C., Boskovski, M.T., Gosev, I., et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: The Brigham and Women's Hospital Experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 4, 2015 38-38.
33. 33 Kaneki, T., Vassileva, C.M., Englum, B., et al. Contemporary outcomes of repeat aortic valve replacement: A benchmark for transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 100 (2015), 1298–1304.
34. 34 Gosev, I., Neely, R.C., Leacche, M., et al. The impact of a minimally invasive approach on reoperative aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 24 (2015), 181–186.
35. 35 Gilmanov, D., Farneti, P.A., Ferrarini, M., et al. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: A propensity-matched analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 20 (2015), 732–741.
36. 36 Pineda, A.M., Santana, O., Reyna, J., et al. Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement via right mini-thoracotomy versus median sternotomy. J Heart Valve Dis 22 (2013), 50–55.
37. 37 Kaneko, T., Loberman, D., Gosev, J., et al. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians–minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147 (2014), 155–162.
38. 38 Di Eusanio, M., Phan, K., Sutureless aortic valve replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 4 (2015), 123–130.
39. 39 Phan, K., Tsai, Y.C., Niranjan, N., et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 4 (2015), 100–111.
40. 40 Aynard, T., Kadner, A., Walpoth, N., et al. Clinical experience with the second-generation 3f enable sutureless aortic valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140 (2010), 313–316.
41. 41 D'Onofrio, A., Messina, A., Lorusso, R., et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement as an alternative treatment for patients belonging to the ‘gray zone’ between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and conventional surgery: A propensity-matched, multicenter analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144 (2012), 10101–11018.
42. 42 Rocher, A.A., Laufer, G., Haverich, A., et al. One-year outcomes of the surgical treatment of aortic stenosis with a next generation surgical aortic vale (TRITON) trial: A prospective multicenter study of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with the Edwards Intuity valve system. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 145 (2013), 110–116.
43. 43 Zannis, K., Folliguet, T., Laborde, F., New sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: Another tool in less invasive aortic valve replacement. Curr Opin Cardiol 27 (2012), 125–129.
44. 44 Barnhart, G.R., Shrestha, M.L., Current clinical evidence on rapid deployment aortic valve replacement: Sutureless aortic bioprostheses. Innovations (Phila) 11 (2016), 7–14.
45. 45 Gersak, B., Fischlein, T., Folliguet, T.A., et al. Sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprosthesis in aortic valve replacement: recommendations of an International Expert Consensus Panel. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49 (2016), 709–718.
46. 46 Shrestha, M., Maeding, J., Hoffler, K., et al. Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients with small aortic roots: Are sutureless valves the future?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 17 (2013), 778–782.
47. 47 Gilmanov, D., Miceli, A., Ferrarini, M., et al. Aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoractomy: Can sutureless technology improve clinical outcomes?. Ann Thorac Surg 98 (2014), 1585–1592.
48. 48 Pollari, F., Santaprpino, G., Dell'Aquila, A.M., et al. Better short-term outcomes by using sutureless valves: A propensity-matched score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 98 (2014), 611–616.
49. 49 Borger, M.A., Moustadine, V., Conradi, L., et al. A randomized multicenter trial of minimally invasive rapid deployment versus conventional full sternotomy aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 99 (2015), 17–25.
50. 50 Dalen, M., Biancari, F., Rubino, A.S., et al. Aortic valve replacement through a full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49 (2016), 220–227.
51. 51 Glauber, M., Gilmanov, D., Farneti, P.A., et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150 (2015), 548–556.
52. 52 Meuris, B., Flameng, W.J., Laborde, F., et al. Five-year results of the pilot trial of a sutureless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150 (2015), 84–88.
53. 53 Glauber, M., Miceli, A., Encouraging durability results for sutureless aortic valve: the new gold standard for aortic valve replacement?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150 (2015), 88–90.
54. 54 Glauber M, Lio A, Miceli A. Sutureless technology for aortic valve replacement: looking beyond cross-clamp time. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Epub ahead of print].
55. 55 Forcillo J, Bouchard D, Nguyen A, et al: Perioperative outcomes with sutureless versus stented biological aortic valves in elderly persons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Epub ahead of print].
56. 56 McCarthy, P.M., Reality check in the minimally invasive world. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150 (2015), 450–451.
57. 57 Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al: Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate risk patients. New Engl J Med [Epub ahead of print].
58. 58 Thourani V, Kodali S, Makkar RR, et al: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: A propensity score analysis. Lancet [Epub ahead of print].
59. 59 D'Onofrio, A., Rizzoli, G., Messina, A., et al. Conventional surgery, sutureless valves, and transapical aortic valve replacement: What is the best option for patients with aortic valve stenosis? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 146 (2013), 1065–1070.
60. 60 Flameng, W., Herregods, M.C., Hermans, H., et al. Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142 (2011), 1453–1457.
61. 61 Santarpino, G., Pfeifer, S., Jessl, J., et al. Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147 (2014), 561–567.
62. 62 Muneretto, C., Bisileri, G., Moggi, A., et al. Treating the patients in the ‘grey-zone’ with aortic valve disease: A comparison among conventional surgery, sutureless valves and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Surg 20 (2015), 90–95.
63. 63 Miceli, A., Gilmanov, D., Murzi, M., et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with a sutureless valve through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49 (2016), 960–965.
64. 64 Hamm, C.W., Arsalan, M., Mack, M.J., The future of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J 37 (2016), 803–810.
65. 65 Bonow, R.O., Leon, M.B., Doshi, D., et al. Management strategies and future challenges for aortic valve disease. Lancet 387 (2016), 1312–1323.