New sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: Another tool in less invasive aortic valve replacement

Current Opinion in Cardiology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 125-129

  Zannis, Konstantinos ^a   Folliguet, Thierry ^a   Laborde, François ^a  

^a INSTITUT MUTUALISTE MONTSOURIS   (France)

Author keywords

aortic valve; minimally invasive AVR; sutureless

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; CARDIOPLEGIA; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HUMAN; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION;

AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84856935328     PISSN: 02684705     EISSN: 15317080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3283501a11     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. O'Brien SM, Shahian DM, Filardo G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: Part 2-isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88 (1 Suppl 1):S23-S42.
2. Leontyev S, Walther T, Borger MA, et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: utility of risk stratification with EuroSCORE. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87:1440-1445.
3. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:1597-1607.
4. Rodes-Cabau J, Webb JG, Cheung A, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk: Acute and late outcomes of the multicenter Canadian experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:1080-1090.
5. Van Brabandt H, Neyt M. Safety of percutaneous aortic valve insertion. A systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2009; 9:45.
6. Zegdi R, Bruneval P, Blanchard D, Fabiani JN. Evidence of leaflet injury during percutaneous aortic valve deployment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40:257-259.
7. Magovern GJ, Harry W. Cromie Sutureless prosthetic heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1963; 46:726-736.
8. Sutton JP 3rd, Ho SY, Anderson RH. The forgotten interleaflet triangles: A review of the surgical anatomy of the aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59:419-427.
9. Lansac E, Lim HS, Shomura Y, et al. A four-dimensional study of the aortic root dynamics. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22:497-503. (Pubitemid 35286928)
10. Cox JL, Ad N, Myers K, et al. Tubular heart valves: A new tissue prosthesis design-preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130:520-527. (Pubitemid 41074187)
11. Shrestha M, Khaladj N, Bara C, et al. A staged approach towards interventional aortic valve implantation with a sutureless valve: Initial human implants. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 56:398-400.
12. Aymard T, Kadner A, Walpoth N, et al. Clinical experience with the secondgeneration 3f Enable sutureless aortic valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140:313-316.
13. Martens S, Ploss A, Sirat S, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement with the 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87:1914-1917.
14. Martens S, Sadowski J, Eckstein FS, et al. Clinical experience with the ATS 3f Enable(R) Sutureless Bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 40:749-755.
15. Mariani J, Ou R, Bailey M, et al. Tolerance to ischemia and hypoxia is reduced in aged human myocardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 120:660-667.
16. Flameng W, Herregods MC, Hermans H, et al. Effect of sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis on intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142:1453-1457.
17. Shrestha M, Folliguet T, Meuris B, et al. Sutureless Perceval S aortic valve replacement: A multicenter, prospective pilot trial. J Heart Valve Dis 2009; 18:698-702.
18. Huynh H, Dalloul G, Ghanbari H, et al. Permanent pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement: Current prevalence and clinical predictors. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2009; 32:1520-1525.
19. Khawaja MZ, Rajani R, Cook A, et al. Permanent pacemaker insertion after CoreValve transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Incidence and contributing factors (the UK CoreValve Collaborative). Circulation 2011; 123:951-960.
20. Cosgrove DM 3rd, Sabik JF. Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62:596-597. (Pubitemid 26259724)
21. Cohn LH, David Adams H, Couper GS, et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg 1997; 226:421-428. (Pubitemid 28049664)
22. Karimov JH, Santarelli F, Murzi M, Glauber M. A technique of an upper V-type ministernotomy in the second intercostal space. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 9:1021-1022.
23. Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Cohn LH, et al. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33:537-541.
24. Modine T, Zannis C, Salleron J, et al. A prospective randomized study to evaluate the renal impact of surgical revascularization strategy in diabetic patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 11:406-410.
25. Castiglioni A, Verzini A, Pappalardo F, et al. Minimally invasive closed circuit versus standard extracorporeal circulation for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83:586-591. (Pubitemid 46135455)
26. WuY, Jin R, Gao G, et al. Cost-effectiveness of aortic valve replacement in the elderly: An introductory study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133:608-613. (Pubitemid 46274758)