Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients with small aortic roots: Are sutureless valves the future?

Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 778-782

  Shrestha, Malakh ^a   Maeding, Ilona ^a   Höffler, Klaus ^a   Koigeldiyev, Nurbol ^a   Marsch, Georg ^a   Siemeni, Thierry ^a   Fleissner, Felix ^a   Haverich, Axel ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aortic valve stenosis; Elderly patients; Small aortic root; Sutureless aortic valve

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA CLAMPING; AORTA ROOT; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTIC ANNULUS ENLARGEMENT; ARTICLE; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CARPENTIER EDWARDS BIOPROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA; EUROSCORE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HANCOCK VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE SURGERY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PARAVALVULAR LEAK; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHETIC VALVE ENDOCARDITIS; SURGICAL MORTALITY; AGE; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELDERLY PATIENTS; EQUIPMENT; EUROPE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LIGATION; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PILOT STUDY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; RISK FACTOR; SMALL AORTIC ROOT; STATISTICAL MODEL; SUTURELESS AORTIC VALVE; SUTURING METHOD; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ELDERLY PATIENTS; SMALL AORTIC ROOT; SUTURELESS AORTIC VALVE;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONSTRICTION; EUROPE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PILOT PROJECTS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RISK FACTORS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84891118966     PISSN: 15699293     EISSN: 15699285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivt291     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978;58:20-4.
2. Mohty D, Dumesnil JG, Echahidi N, Mathieu P. Impact of prosthesispatient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: Influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:39-47.
3. Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WR, Birkmeyer NJ, Lemmer JH, Miller DC et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:783-93.
4. Nicks R, Cartmill T, Bernstein L. Hypoplasia of the aortic root: The problem of aortic valve replacement. Thorax 1970;25:339-346.
5. Manouguian S, Seyblod-Epting W. Patch enlargement of the aortic valve ring by extending the aortic incision to the anterior mitral leaflet. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979;78:402-12.
6. Konno S, Imai Y, Lida Y, Nakajima M, Tatsuno K. A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975;70:909-17.
7. Sommers KE, David TE. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:1608-12.
8. Coutinho GF, Correia PM, Pauperio G, de Oliveira F, Antunes MJ. Aortic root enlargement does not increase the surgical risk and short-term patient outcome? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:441-7.
9. Kulik A, Al-Saigh M, Chan V, Masters RG. Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: Is there a benefit? Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:94-101.
10. Shrestha M, Folliguet T, Meuris B, Dibie A, Bara C, Herregods MC et al. Sutureless Perceval S aortic valve replacement: A multicenter prospective pilot trial. J Heart Valve Dis 2009;18:11.
11. Brown JM, O'Brien SM, Wu C, Sikora JA. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108, 687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:82-90.
12. Eusanio M, Fortuna D, Palma R, Dell'Amore A, Lamarra M, Gontini G et al. Aortic valve replacement: Results and predictors of mortality from a contemporary series of 2256 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141: 940-7.
13. Gummert JF, Funkat AK, Beckmann A, Ernst M, Hekmat K, Beyersdorf F et al. Cardiac Surgery in Germany during 2010: A report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;59:259-67.
14. Mihaljevic T, Cohn LH, Unic D, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Byrne JG. One thousand minimally invasive valve operations: Early and late results. Ann Surg 2004;240:529-34.
15. Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, Frati G, Sani G. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:460-5.
16. Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Cohn LH, Bolman RM III, Shekar PS, Chen FY et al. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33:537-41.
17. Magovern GJ, Cromie HW. Sutureless prosthetic heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1963;46:726-736.
18. Scott SM, Sethi GK, Flye MW, Takaro T. The sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: Experience with and technical considerations for replacement of the early model. Ann Surg 1976;184:174-8.