The Substantial Clinical Benefit Threshold for SRS-22R Domains After Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity

Spine Deformity

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 373-377

  Crawford, Charles H ^a,b   Glassman, Steven D ^a,b   Bridwell, Keith H ^c   Carreon, Leah Y ^a  

^a NORTON LEATHERMAN SPINE CENTER   (United States)

^b University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult spinal deformity; Clinical outcomes; SRS 22R; Substantial clinical benefit

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL OUTCOME; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE SURGERY; ABNORMALITIES; AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE;

EID: 84994607466     PISSN: 2212134X     EISSN: 22121358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. [1] Asher, M.A., Lai, S.M., Glattes, R.C., et al. Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire Function domain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 (2006), 593–597.
2. [2] Asher, M., Min Lai, S., Burton, D., Manna, B., Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 28 (2003), 74–78.
3. [3] Asher, M., Min Lai, S., Burton, D., Manna, B., Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 28 (2003), 70–73.
4. [4] Asher, M., Min Lai, S., Burton, D., Manna, B., The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28 (2003), 63–69.
5. [5] Cutler, H.S., Guzman, J.Z., Al Maaieh, M., et al. Patient-reported outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery: a bibliometric analysis. Spine Deform 3 (2015), 312–317.
6. [6] Baldus, C., Bridwell, K.H., Harrast, J., et al. Age-gender matched comparison of SRS instrument scores between adult deformity and normal adults: are all SRS domains disease specific?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33 (2008), 2214–2218.
7. [7] Berven, S., Deviren, V., Demir-Deviren, S., et al. Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 (2003), 2164–2169.
8. [8] Bridwell, K.H., Berven, S., Glassman, S., et al. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 (2007), 2220–2225.
9. [9] Bridwell, K.H., Cats-Baril, W., Harrast, J., et al. The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 (2005), 455–461.
10. [10] Crawford, C.H. 3rd, Glassman, S.D., Bridwell, K.H., et al. The minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22R total score, appearance, activity and pain domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40 (2015), 377–381.
11. [11] Glassman, S.D., Copay, A.G., Berven, S.H., et al. Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 (2008), 1839–1847.
12. [12] SRS-30 Patient Questionnaire/Score Sheet [Scoliosis Research Society web site]. http://srs.org/professionals/outcomes/srs-30_score_sheet.pdf.
13. [13] Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., Applied logistic regression. 2000, Wiley, New York.
14. [14] Glassman, S.D., Branch, C.L. Jr., Evidence-based medicine: raising the bar. Spine J 7 (2007), 513–515.
15. [15] Gum, J.L., Bridwell, K.H., Lenke, L.G., et al. SRS22R Appearance domain correlates most with patient satisfaction after adult deformity surgery to the sacrum at 5 year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40 (2015), 1297–1302.
16. [16] Fairbank, J.C., Pynsent, P.B., The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 (2000), 2940–2952.
17. [17] Walsh, T.L., Hanscom, B., Lurie, J.D., Weinstein, J.N., Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 (2003), 607–615.
18. [18] Carreon, L.Y., Sanders, J.O., Diab, M., et al., Spinal Deformity Study Group. The minimum clinically important difference in Scoliosis Research Society–22 Appearance, Activity, And Pain domains after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 (2010), 2079–2083.
19. [19] Carreon, L.Y., Sanders, J.O., Polly, D.W., et al., Spinal Deformity Study Group. Spinal appearance questionnaire: factor analysis, scoring, reliability, and validity testing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36 (2011), E1240–E1244.
20. [20] Sanders, J.O., Harrast, J.J., Kuklo, T.R., et al., Spinal Deformity Study Group. The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 (2007), 2719–2722.
21. [21] International Spine Study Group, McCarthy, I., Bess, R.S., O'Brien, M., et al. Calculating and defining minimally important clinical difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) values for adult spinal deformity (ASD): a robust methodology for consistent data reporting. Spine J, 13, 2013, 75S.
22. [22] Brazier, J., Roberts, J., Deverill, M., The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21 (2002), 271–292.
23. [23] Copay, A.G., Glassman, S.D., Subach, B.R., et al. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 8 (2008), 968–974.
24. [24] Ware, J. Jr., Kosinski, M., Keller, S.D., A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34 (1996), 220–233.