Age-gender matched comparison of SRS instrument scores between adult deformity and normal adults: Are all SRS domains disease specific?

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 20, 2008, Pages 2214-2218

  Baldus, Christine ^a   Bridwell, Keith H ^a   Harrast, John ^a   Edwards, Charles ^a   Glassman, Steven ^a   Horton, William ^a   Lenke, Lawrence G ^a   Lowe, Thomas ^a   Mardjetko, Steve ^a   Ondra, Stephen ^a   Schwab, Frank ^a   Shaffrey, Christopher ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult deformity; Discriminate validity; Volunteers

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DETERMINATION; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL HEALTH; MULTICENTER STUDY; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DETERMINATION; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE SURGERY; UNITED STATES; AGE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HOSPITALIZATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCOLIOSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 55449117135     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c0466     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Haher T, Gorup J, Shin T, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1435-1440.
2. White S, Asher M, Lai S, et al. Patients' perceptions of overall function, pain and. appearance after primary posterior instrumentation and. fusion for idio-pathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1693-1700.
3. Asher M, Lai S, Burton D. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25:2381-2386.
4. Asher M, Lai S, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Scoiety-22 patient questionnaire. Spine 2003;28:74-78.
5. Asher M, Lai S, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society - 22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:63-69.
6. Asher M, Lai S, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis Research Society - 22 patient questionnaire responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-73.
7. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, et al. Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument in adults: Validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine 2003;28:2165-2169.
8. Lai S, Asher M, Burton D. Estimating SRS-22 quality of life measure with SF-36. Spine 2006;31:473-478.
9. Bridwell KH, Cats-Baril W, Harrast J, et al. The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Os-westry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency and reliability. Spine 2005;30:455-461.
10. Bridwell KH, Berven S, Glassman S, et al. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery. Spine 2007;32:2220-2225.