The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: Results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 24, 2007, Pages 2719-2722

  Sanders, James O ^a   Harrast, John J ^b   Kuklo, Timothy R ^c   Polly, David W ^d   Bridwell, Keith H ^c   Diab, Mohammad ^e   Dormans, John P ^f   Drummond, Denis S ^f   Emans, John B ^g   Johnston II, Charles E ^h   Lenke, Lawrence G ^c   McCarthy, Richard E ⁱ   Newton, Peter O ^j   Richards, B Stephens ^h   Sucato, Daniel J ^h  

^a SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^b Data Harbor   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^g BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

ⁱ Jackson T Stephens Spine and Neurosciences Institute   (United States)

^j RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Appearance; Outcomes; Scoliosis; Spinal deformity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; KYPHOSIS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE MALFORMATION; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; VALIDITY;

BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOLIOSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 36248963119     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5959     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Sanders JO, Polly DW Jr, Cats-Baril W, et al. Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale. Spine 2003;28:2158-63.
2. Asher MA, Min LS, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25:2381-6.
3. Pineda S, Bago J, Gilperez C, et al. Validity of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale to measure subjective perception of spine deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2006;1:18.
4. Bridwell KH, Shufflebarger HL, Lenke LG, et al. Parents' and patients' preferences and concerns in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis: a cross-sectional preoperative analysis. Spine 2000;25:2392-9.
5. Rinella A, Lenke L, Peelle M, et al. Comparison of SRS questionnaire results submitted by both parents and patients in the operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:303-10.
6. Smith PL, Donaldson S, Hedden D, et al. Parents' and patients' perceptions of postoperative appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:2367-74.
7. Climent JM, Reig A, Sanchez J, et al. Construction and validation of a specific quality of life instrument for adolescents with spine deformities. Spine 1995;20:2006-11.
8. Climent JM, Sanchez J. Impact of the type of brace on the quality of life of adolescents with spine deformities. Spine 1999;24:1903-8.
9. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24:1435-40.