Spinal appearance questionnaire: Factor analysis, scoring, reliability, and validity testing

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 18, 2011, Pages

  Carreon, Leah Y ^a   Sanders, James O ^b   Polly, David W ^c   Sucato, Daniel J ^d   Parent, Stefan ^e   Roy Beaudry, Marjolaine ^e   Hopkins, Jeffrey ^d   McClung, Anna ^d   Bratcher, Kelly R ^a   Diamond, Beverly E ^f  

^a NORTON LEATHERMAN SPINE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^f PhDx Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

dolescent idiopathic scoliosis; factor analysis; outcomes; reliability study; Spinal Appearance Questionnaire; validation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; BRACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SPINAL APPEARANCE QUESTIONNAIRE; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY;

ADOLESCENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOLIOSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SPINE;

EID: 80051785618     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318204f987     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Sanders JO, Polly DW Jr, Cats-Baril W, et al. AIS Section of the Spinal Deformity Study Group. Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale. Spine 2003;28(18):2158-63.
2. Sanders JO, Harrast JJ, Kuklo TR, et al. Spinal Deformity Study Group. The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: results of reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007;32(24):2719-22.
3. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28(1):63-9.
4. Asher MA, Min Lai S, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25(18):2381-6.
5. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Questionnaire. Spine 2005;30(21):2464-8.
6. Bago J, Climent JM, Ey A, et al. The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine 2004;29(15):1676-80.
7. Beauséjour M, Joncas J, Goulet L, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted French Canadian version of Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) in Quebec. Spine 2009;34(6):623-8.
8. Glowacki M, Misterska E, Laurentowska M, et al. Polish adaptation of scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire. Spine 2009;34(10):1060-5.
9. Hashimoto H, Sase T, Arai Y, et al. Validation of a Japanese version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire among idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan. Spine 2007;32(4):E141-6.
10. Li M, Wang CF, Gu SX, et al. Adapted simplifi ed Chinese (mainland) version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire. Spine 2009;34(12):1321-4.
11. Monticone M, Carabalona R, Negrini S. Reliability of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire (Italian version) in mild adolescent vertebral deformities. Eura Medicophys 2004;40(3): 191-7.
12. Niemeyer T, Schubert C, Halm HF, et al. Validity and reliability of an adapted German version of scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire. Spine 2009;34(8):818-21.
13. Zhao L, Zhang Y, Sun X, et al. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire adapted for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients in China: reliability and validity analysis (published online ahead of print November 3, 2007).J Child Orthop 2007;1(6):351-5.
14. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine 2003;28(1):74-8.
15. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28(1):70-3.
16. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. Spine deformity correlates better than trunk deformity with idiopathic scoliosis patients' quality of life questionnaire responses. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002;91:462-4.
17. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, et al. Studies in the modify ed scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine 2003;28(18): 2164-9.
18. Bridwell KH, Cats-Baril W, Harrast J, et al. The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine 2005;30(4):455-61.
19. Lai SM, Asher M, Burton D. Estimating SRS-22 quality of life measures with SF-36: application in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31(4):473-8.
20. Glattes RC, Burton DC, Lai SM, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire compared with the Child Health Questionnaire- CF87 patient questionnaire for adolescent spinal deformity. Spine 2007;32(16):1778-84.
21. Pineda S, Bago J, Gilperez C, et al. Validity of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale to measure subjective perception of spine deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 2006;1:18.
22. Bago J, Climent JM, Pineda S, et al. Further evaluation of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale: correlation with curve pattern and radiological deformity. Scoliosis 2007;2:12.
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ 1997;314 (7080):572.
24. Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, et al. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. Spine 2005;30(6):705-9.
25. Parent EC, Hill D, Mahood J, et al. Discriminative and predictive validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire in management and curve-severity subgroups of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(22):2450-7.