Patient Reported Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis

Spine Deformity

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 312-317

  Cutler, Holt S ^a   Guzman, Javier Z ^a   Al Maaieh, Motasem ^a   Connolly, James ^a   Skovrlj, Branko ^a   Cho, Samuel K ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult spinal deformity; Health related quality of life; Oswestry; Patient reported outcomes; Scoliosis research society

Indexed keywords

ADULT DISEASE; ADULT SPINAL DEFORMITY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; BIBLIOMETRICS; CLINICAL STUDY; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SHORT FORM 36; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84931837509     PISSN: 2212134X     EISSN: 22121358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. I. McCarthy, R. Hostin, M. O'Brien, and et al. Health economic analysis of adult deformity surgery Neurosurg Clin N Am 24 2013 293 304
2. S. Yadla, M.G. Maltenfort, J.K. Ratliff, and et al. Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review Neurosurg Focus 28 2010 E3
3. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. Levels of Evidence (March 2009) [Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine web site]. http://www.cebm.net/ocebm-levels-of-evidence/ Accessed June 6, 2014.
4. K.H. Bridwell, S. Berven, C. Edwards 2nd, and et al. The problems and limitations of applying evidence-based medicine to primary surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 19 Suppl 2007 S135 S139
5. S. Berven, V. Deviren, S. Demir-Deviren, and et al. Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 2003 2164 2169 discussion 2169
6. S.M. Lai, D.C. Burton, M.A. Asher, and et al. Converting SRS-24, SRS-23, and SRS-22 to SRS-22r: establishing conversion equations using regression modeling Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36 2011 E1525 E1533
7. A. Alanay, A. Cil, H. Berk, and et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 2005 2464 2468
8. M. Asher, S. Min Lai, D. Burton, and et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 2003 63 69
9. D.C. Burton, and R.C. Glattes Measuring outcomes in spinal deformity Neurosurg Clin N Am 18 2007 403 405
10. J.M. Climent, J. Bago, A. Ey, and et al. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 2005 705 709
11. R.C. Glattes, D.C. Burton, S.M. Lai, and et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22r patient questionnaire compared with the Child Health Questionnaire-CF87 patient questionnaire for adolescent spinal deformity Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 2007 1778 1784
12. H. Hashimoto, T. Sase, Y. Arai, and et al. Validation of a Japanese version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire among idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 2007 E141 E146
13. S.J. Mousavi, B. Mobini, H. Mehdian, and et al. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 2010 784 789
14. S.D. Glassman, F. Schwab, K.H. Bridwell, and et al. Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery? Spine J 9 2009 317 322
15. J.C. Fairbank, J. Couper, J.B. Davies, and et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire Physiotherapy 66 1980 271 273
16. R.F. Heary Evaluation and treatment of adult spinal deformity. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves J Neurosurg Spine 2004 2004 9 18
17. J.E. Ware Jr. Standards for validating health measures: definition and content J Chronic Dis 40 1987 473 480
18. T. Walsh Point of view on the Oswestry Disability Index Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 2000 2953
19. R.A. Deyo, and D.L. Patrick Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research Med Care 27 3 suppl 1989 S254 S268
20. J.C. Fairbank, and P.B. Pynsent The Oswestry Disability Index Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 2000 2940 2952 discussion 2952
21. M. Roland, and J. Fairbank The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 2000 3115 3124
22. J.C. Fairbank Use and abuse of Oswestry Disability Index Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 2007 2787 2789
23. J.E. Ware Jr., and C.D. Sherbourne The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection Med Care 30 1992 473 483
24. Ware J. SF-36 Health Survey Update [SF-36 web site]. October 2, 2003. Available at: http://www.sf-36.org/tools/sf36.shtml. Accessed June 6, 2014.
25. M.R. Guilfoyle, H. Seeley, and R.J. Laing The Short Form 36 health survey in spine disease - validation against condition-specific measures Br J Neurosurg 23 2009 401 405
26. L.Y. Carreon, K.R. Bratcher, N. Das, and et al. Estimating EQ-5D Values From the Oswestry Disability Index and Numeric Rating Scales for Back and Leg Pain Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 2014 678 682
27. L.Y. Carreon, S.D. Glassman, C.M. McDonough, and et al. Predicting SF-6D utility scores from the Oswestry disability index and numeric rating scales for back and leg pain Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 2009 2085 2089
28. M.E. Wewers, and N.K. Lowe A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena Res Nurs Health 13 1990 227 236
29. A.M. Stiggelbout, M.J. Eijkemans, G.M. Kiebert, and et al. The "utility" of the visual analog scale in medical decision making and technology assessment. Is it an alternative to the time trade-off? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 12 1996 291 298
30. M.E. van den Akker, M.P. Arts, W.B. van den Hout, and et al. Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for the treatment of lumbar disk-related sciatica: cost utility analysis alongside a double-blind randomized controlled trial Neurosurgery 69 2011 829 835 discussion 835-6
31. K.J. Hunt, and D. Hurwit Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research J Bone Joint Surg Am 95 2013 e118 (1-9)