Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 362-367

  Su, Ting Shu ^a   Sun, Jian ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DEVICES; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; THERAPEUTIC USE;

CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84962688228     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. 1 Mörmann, W.H., The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 137:suppl (2006), 7S–13S.
2. 2 Luthardt, R., Weber, A., Rudolph, H., Schöne, C., Quaas, S., Walter, M., Design and production of dental prosthetic restorations: basic research on dental CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent 5 (2002), 165–176.
3. 3 Wöstmann, B., Rehmann, P., Trost, D., Balkenhol, M., Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns. J Dent 36 (2008), 508–512.
4. 4 Abdel-Azim, T., Rogers, K., Elathamna, E., Zandinejad, A., Metz, M., Morton, D., Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 114 (2015), 554–559.
5. 5 Schepke, U., Meijer, H.J., Kerdijk, W., Cune, M.S., Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: operating time and patient preference. J Prosthet Dent 114 (2015), 403–406.
6. 6 Tidehag, P., Ottosson, K., Sjögren, G., Accuracy of ceramic restorations made using an in-office optical scanning technique: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 39 (2014), 308–316.
7. 7 Cho, S.H., Schaefer, O., Thompson, G.A., Guentsch, A., Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 113 (2015), 310–315.
8. 8 Holmes, J.R., Bayne, S.C., Holland, G.A., Sulik, W.D., Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62 (1989), 405–408.
9. 9 Fransson, B., Oilo, G., Gjeitanger, R., The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1 (1985), 197–199.
10. 10 Wettstein, F., Sailer, I., Roos, M., Hammerle, C.H., Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 116 (2008), 272–279.
11. 11 Boening, K.W., Wolf, B.H., Schmidt, A.E., Kastner, K., Walter, M.H., Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 84 (2000), 419–424.
12. 12 Syrek, A., Reich, G., Ranftl, D., Klein, C., Cerny, B., Brodesser, J., Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38 (2010), 553–559.
13. 13 Kokubo, Y., Ohkubo, C., Tsumita, M., Miyashita, A., Vult von Steyern, P., et al. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Oral Rehab 32 (2005), 526–530.
14. 14 Pradíes, G., Zarauz, C., Valverde, A., Ferreiroa, A., Martínez-Rus, F., Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 43 (2015), 201–208.
15. 15 Logozzo, S., Franceschini, G., Kilpelä, A., Caponi, M., Governi, L., Blois, L., A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. The Internet Journal of Medical Technology, 5, 2011 1.
16. 16 Ng, J., Ruse, D., Wyatt, C., A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 555–560.
17. 17 Rekow, E.D., Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story. J Am Dent Assoc 137 (2006), 5S–6S.
18. 18 Ting-Shu, S., Jian, S., Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont 24 (2015), 313–321.
19. 19 Karlsson, S., The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 51 (1993), 129–134.
20. 20 McLean, J.W., von Fraunhofer, J.A., The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131 (1971), 107–111.
21. 21 Belser, U.C., MacEntee, M.I., Richter, W.A., Fit of three porcelain-fused-to-metal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 53 (1985), 24–29.
22. 22 Sulaiman, F., Chai, J., Jameson, L.M., Wozniak, W.T., A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 10 (1997), 478–484.
23. 23 Galhano, G.Á., Pellizzer, E.P., Mazaro, J.V., Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations. J Craniofac Surg 23 (2012), 575–579.
24. 24 Almeida, E., Silva, J.S., Erdelt, K., Edelhoff, D., Araújo, E., Stimmelmayr, M., et al. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 18 (2014), 515–523.
25. 25 Anadioti, E., Aquilino, S.A., Gratton, D.G., Holloway, J.A., Denry, I.L., Thomas, G.W., et al. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthet Dent 113 (2015), 304–309.
26. 26 Seelbach, P., Brueckel, C., Wöstmann, B., Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 1759–1764.
27. 27 Keul, C., Stawarczyk, B., Erdelt, K.J., Beuer, F., Edelhoff, D., Güth, J.F., Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization–a laboratory study. Dent Mater 30 (2014), 400–407.
28. 28 Brawek, P.K., Wolfart, S., Endres, L., Kirsten, A., Reich, S., The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow—the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 2119–2125.
29. 29 Boeddinghaus, M., Breloer, E.S., Rehmann, P., Wöstmann, B., Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig 19 (2015), 2027–2034.
30. 30 Huh, J.B., Kim, J.H., Chung, M.K., Lee, H.Y., Choi, Y.G., Shim, J.S., The effect of several dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of adhesive resin luting cement using self-etching primer. J Dent 36 (2008), 1025–1032.
31. 31 Haim, M., Luthardt, R.G., Rudolph, H., Koch, R., Walter, M.H., Quaas, S., Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 22 (2009), 296–302.
32. 32 Kumar, S., Gandhi, U.V., Banerjee, S., An in vitro study of the bond strength of five adhesives used for vinyl polysiloxane impression materials and tray materials. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14 (2014), 61–66.
33. 33 Corso, M., Abanomy, A., Di Canzio, J., Zurakowski, D., Morgano, S.M., The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 79 (1998), 626–631.
34. 34 Laurent, M., Scheer, P., Dejou, J., Laborde, G., Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns—validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehab 35 (2008), 116–122.
35. 35 Cardelli, P., Scotti, R., Monaco, C., Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent, 17, 2011.