Professional development as the pursuit of professional standards: The standards-based professional development system

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 127-140

  Ingvarson, Lawrence ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032365703     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00065-6     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bacharach S. B., Conley S. C., Shedd J. B. Evaluating teachers for career awards and merit pay. Millman J., Darling-Hammond L. The new handbook of teacher evaluation. 1990;133-146 Sage, Beverley Hills, CA.
2. Borko H., Putnam R. Expanding a teacher's knowledge base. a cognitive psychological perspective on professional development Guskey T., Huberman M. Professional development in education. New paradigms and practices:1995;35-65 Teachers College Press, New York.
3. Bruner J. Actual minds, possible worlds. 1986;Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
4. Chittenden E., Jones J. The South Brunswick, NJ, Project with the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: Professional development in the context of assessment. 1996;Division of Research, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
5. Darling-Hammond L. Creating standards of practice and delivery for learnercentred schools. Stanford Law and Policy Review. 4:1992;37-52.
6. Elmore R. Getting to scale. Fuhrman S., O'Day J. Incentives and systemic reform. 1996;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
7. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., and Behrend, J. (this issue). Understanding teacher's self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education.
8. Haertel E. H. New Forms of Teacher Assesment. Gerald Grant Review of research in education. 17:1991;American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
9. Haynes D. D. One teacher's experience with National Board Assesment. Educational Leadership. 52(6):1995;58-60.
10. Huberman M. Professional careers and professional development. some intersections Guskey T., Huberman M. Professional development in education. New paradigms and practices:1995;193-224 Teachers College Press, New York.
11. Ingvarson L. C. Building professional community and supporting teacher as learners. the potential of case methods Logan L., Sachs J. 1997;229-243 Routledge, London.
12. Kilpatrick J., Stanic G. Paths to the present. Carl I. M. Prospects for school mathematics. 1995;Mathematics Education Trust of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston,VA.
13. Kerchner C. T., Koppich J. E., Weeres J. G. United mind workers. Unions and teaching in the knowledge society:1997;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
14. Lappan G., Briars D. How should mathematics be taught? Carl I. M. Prospects for school mathematics. 1995;Mathematics Education Trust of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston,VA.
15. Leinhardt G., Putnam R., Stein M. K., Baxter J. Where subject knowledge matters. Brophy J. Advances in research on teaching Volume 2, Teacher's knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice. 1991;JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
16. Lieberman A., McLaughlin M. W. Networks for educational change. powerful and problematic Phi Delta Kappan. 73:1992;673-677.
17. Little J. W. Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 15(2):1993;129-151.
18. Little J. W., McLaughlin M. W. Urban Mathematics Collaboratives. As the teachers tell it:1991;Centre for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, School of Education, Stanford University.
19. Louis, K. S., Kruse, S. D., & Marks, H. M. (1996) Schoolwide professional community. In F.M. Newman and Associates, Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179-203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Teacher's professional lives in the United States. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 18 - 22, April 1995.
21. Merseth K. Cases and case method in teacher education. Sikula J. Handbook of research on teacher education. 2:1996;722-744 Macmillan, New York.
22. Mohrman A. M., Mohrman S. A., Odden A. Aligning teacher compensation with systematic school reform. Skill based pay and group based performance rewards Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 18(1):1996;51-71.
23. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (1989). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession. Detroit: NBPTS.
24. National Board for professional Teaching Standards (March, 1997). State and local action supporting National Board Certification. A report of the National Board for professional Teaching Standards, Southfield, Detroit, Michigan (www.nbpts.org).
25. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York, NY: National Commission on teaching and America's Future.
26. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
27. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for the teaching of mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
28. Nias J. Seeing anew. teacher's theories of action:1987;Deakin University Press, Geelong, Vic.
29. Odden A., Kelley C. Paying teachers for what they know and do. New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools:1997;Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
30. Pearlman, M. (Forthcoming). An architecture for NBPTS performance assessments. L. C. Ingvarson (Ed.), Evaluating teachers for professional certification: The first ten years of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
31. Romberg T. Problematic features of the school mathematics curriculum. Jackson P.W. handbook of research in teaching. 1992;Macmillan, New York.
32. Schifter D. Voicing the new pedagogy. teachers write about teaching and learning mathematics:1994;Centre for Development of Teaching Paper Series, Newton, MA. Education Development Centre.
33. Scriven M. Beyond formtive and summative evaluation. McLaughlin M. W., Phillips D. C. Evluation and education at quarter centuary. 1991;University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Ninetieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II.
34. Shulman J. H. Case methods in teacher education. 1992;Teachers College Press, New York.
35. Sparks D., Loucks-Horsley S. Models of staff development. Houston W. R. Handbook of research on teacher education. 1990;Macmillan, New York.
36. Sprinthall N. A., Reiman A. J., Thies-Sprinthall L. Sikula J. Handbook of research on teacher education. 2:1996;666-703 Macmillan, New York.
37. Tracz, S., and Associates (1995). Improvement in teaching skills: perspectives from National Board for Professional Teaching Standards field test network candidates. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 18 - 22 April, San Francisco.